Art Critiques

In my art classes, we take meaningful time to look closely at student artwork and photographs, both individually and as a group, through careful examination and thoughtful response. Our critique process is grounded in my extensive training in Ohio State University’s groundbreaking approach, which emphasizes structured, reflective, and constructive dialogue.

This method supports the development of both technical skill and conceptual thinking while strengthening essential soft skills students will carry into future classes, careers, and professional fields. Through critique, students gain a deeper understanding of their own artistic choices while also building respect, insight, and appreciation for the work of others.

Students learn standards based language through the use of Visual Vocabulary from the California Visual Arts Standards.

The most accepted method is the DAIJ framework:

D – Describe: A student explains what they see in their photograph, noting composition, lighting, and subject
A – Analyze: They examine how these elements work together to create mood or focus.
I – Interpret: The student explores the intended message or emotional impact of the image.
J – Judge: Finally, they evaluate the success of the work in achieving its concept, identifying strengths and areas for improvement.

I also display a word wall as a resource to help students develop their knowledge of art vocabulary.

I incorporate additional methods for responding to art including art cards and other game based response methods. Mixing up written and spoken feedback ensures that a critique provides feedback that is meaningful, reflective, and supports growth for every student.

In addition, I am now using the new and innovative "Constructing Meaning" design for literacy, especially when note taking in the beginning of new units.

Room 109 Critique Wall

Page updated

Report abuse