Disconnected Learning
March 7, 2025
March 7, 2025
Technology has revolutionized education, offering students instant access to limitless information. But are we witnessing a crisis in critical thinking and deep learning? Many students no longer struggle through the learning process—they simply ask Google or AI for the answer. Plagiarism is at an all-time high, and some students struggle to form their own ideas because they’ve never needed to.
At my school, we’ve taken a drastic step: phones are collected at the beginning of the school day and returned at the end. The results? Many students would rather face suspension than part with their devices. The level of attachment is alarming, raising critical questions about how technology is reshaping learning—and whether we’re doing enough to keep students engaged beyond the screen.
In the past, students had to read, analyze, and think through problems. Now, they just type a question into a search bar or use AI-powered chatbots for instant answers. While this makes life easier, it discourages perseverance, patience, and deep thinking—skills essential for real-world success.
Instead of learning how to think, students are learning what to think—whatever appears first on Google. When answers are always one click away, the process of learning becomes secondary to the outcome.
AI writing tools can generate full essays in seconds, and students are taking full advantage. But many don’t even realize they’re plagiarizing—they assume that since AI wrote it, it’s "theirs." Schools are struggling to keep up with AI-generated plagiarism, and traditional plagiarism checkers can’t always detect this new form of academic dishonesty.
This raises an urgent question: How do we teach students to value original thought in an era where AI can do the thinking for them? One useful starting point is exploring frameworks for digital literacy in the age of AI to help students critically evaluate and ethically use technology.
At my school, we decided to confiscate phones at the start of the school day. The results were shocking. Some students experienced:
Anxiety and agitation—constantly asking when they’d get their phone back
Inability to focus—struggling to complete tasks without distractions
Defiance and resistance—some choosing a five-day suspension over giving up their phone
These extreme reactions reveal a dangerous dependency. If students can’t function without their devices, how can we expect them to engage in deep learning?
Over time, an interesting shift occurred. Students became more engaged, talked more, and even started reading books again. Some who initially fought against the policy later admitted they felt more focused and less stressed without their phones constantly buzzing.
However, once they got their phones back at the end of the day, they immediately disconnected from the real world again. This raises an important question: Should schools be responsible for implementing tech detoxes, or should this be addressed at home?
Technology itself isn’t the enemy—it’s how we use it. Instead of letting students passively consume information, we should encourage them to create with it.
💡 Ideas for Meaningful Tech Use in Schools:
✔️ Teaching coding and app development
✔️ Using AI for brainstorming, not cheating
✔️ Encouraging digital storytelling and video creation
✔️ Promoting research projects that require synthesis, not just copy-pasting
If we shift students from being consumers to creators, we can help them develop real-world skills while still embracing technology.
AI is here to stay, and banning it completely isn’t the solution. Instead, we must find a balance—teaching students how to use AI as a tool without letting it replace their own thinking.
👩🏫 What Educators Can Do:
🔹 Teach digital literacy—help students understand the ethics of AI use
🔹 Emphasize critical thinking—ask students to explain why an answer is correct, not just what the answer is
🔹 Implement AI policies—set clear guidelines on when and how AI can be used
Technology isn’t going anywhere, and schools must adapt. But if we don’t address these challenges now, we risk raising a generation that can’t function without instant information.