The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences.
Lots of room for growth...
The first lesson I created as a future educator is this Social Studies Lesson on "Spanish Explorers and Spanish Missions".
Because Arizona’s 3rd-grade students are learning about state history, I constructed a lesson revolving around Spanish Missions and explorers. My first iterations of this lesson were long, chunky, and disconnected. The activities individually would have been effective (comprehension questions, vocabulary matching, creating a map), but they did not flow well.
The passage my lesson is based on was given by my mentor, as a continuation of their previous curriculum. Along with reading the passage, I added a graphic organizer of “Big Ideas” (part of my “We do”), and a letter-writing activity (“You do). The 3rd graders are at a stage of development where thinking from others’ perspectives is new, interesting, and challenging. I wanted my lesson to be within the students’ zone of proximal development by including familiar concepts and challenging them with deeper thinking.
When I first started, I figured more ideas were better than too few, so I made a lesson that would have taken 3-4 days for all the activities. The major changes I made primarily consisted of cutting back on activities. Within my document, I left highlighted and struck-through text to show examples of changes I made through my revision process. I was also challenged in making the worksheets associated with my lesson. Originally, there were activities in the packet that my mentor shared, but I didn’t think those would be as effective with my objectives. So, I brainstormed and created the graphic organizer and letter-writing worksheet. It was a great experience for me to see what creating worksheets for my lessons will be like in the future.
In creating this lesson, I was able to immerse myself in learner growth and development. The processing and assessment strategies guided my design. I've included my thought process while developing, as well as a reflection of my development as a future educator in this process.
My ignite is showing students a treasure chest. I changed it from an image to bringing a real treasure chest (or treasure like fake coins) after hearing how much more fun physical “artifacts” are for students. My chunk is creating a graphic organizer for the passage they read. I plan to answer questions that students will need the answers to for later peer discussions and letter-writing. My chew is having students answer comprehensive questions and doing a think-pair-share with their table. They can refer back to their graphic organizers if they need help. My review (and assessment) is students taking all their new knowledge and using it to write a letter from the perspective of someone from the passage (Hernando Cortés, Spanish missionary, indigenous person).
If students are able to do this, then I will know they understood the passage, are able to apply it to an activity, and can connect with historical people in the same way as they connect with their peers in the classroom. I want students to know that history is factual. These were real people who took real action and had real feelings, just like themselves and the people alive today. These strategies I’m utilizing build off of and rely on each other for my lesson to be successful. With this lesson, I am working towards developing the students’ cognitive, social, and emotional areas. By having students read about a new historical figure and creating a graphic organizer, they are creating a visual structure that simplifies complex information. This helps them reference back to the needed information after it has left their memory. Considering students will only be fully focused on the lesson for about 15 minutes at a time (with 10 minutes of mental rest before resetting), the graphic organizer is crucial. The students will also be challenged with their comprehensive questions, needing to look back at the passage to provide written answers. This tests their fluency, vocabulary, and reading speed as well. Of course, if they need help, then the teacher (me) will be there to guide them or lighten some of the cognitive load with scaffolding.
One of my favorite subjects to study is psychology, so I’ve especially been enjoying our Educational Psychology class. I’ve come to realize the importance of considering what stage of development my students are in as I am creating their lessons. According to Piaget, 3rd graders (ages 8-9) are in the concrete operational stage of cognitive development. This stage is characterized by more logical thinking, understanding cause and effect, developing a sense of empathy, and starting to see events from other perspectives (leaving the egocentric stage). History will naturally increase their cause and effect reasoning, but the letter writing activity (my closure) will be a great way to incite empathy and create opportunities for students to think from the perspective of others in an academic setting. I’m curious as to how their stage of moral development will affect their perception of history and others' feelings. According to Kohlberg, they are in the preconventional morality stage and will likely make decisions based on punishments or rewards. If I ask them if it’s okay to conquer someone's land for gold, will they say, “as long as you gain enough gold, it’s worth it,” or “that is not right because you will get caught and punished”?
I am confident my understanding of instructional alignments has improved as a result of these experiences. When writing objectives, it is best to focus on one (at most two) in a lesson. The first version of my Social Studies lesson had 2-3 objectives and was too unfocused. Objectives are meant to guide our lessons through a stated purpose and what we want students to learn. For activities, I have SO many ideas, it is difficult to choose the best ones. There are a few classics that are always great for a lesson, like graphic organizers, partner-sharing, and discussions. Finally, assessments come in many different forms, and they don’t need to be boring and formulaic. Yes, certain assessment types are more effective and will be used often. However, there are other times when I can take liberty in how I’m assessing my students' understanding. This lesson utilized a writing activity to determine students’ understanding rather than a quiz/test. I was still able to successfully ascertain what my students learned, thought, and felt from my chosen assessment. Overall, my lesson improved over time by becoming more focused. Alignment ensures that we are meeting the standards set by the state, AND that our curriculum is connected, progressing in content and difficulty, knowledge is building on prior knowledge, and that students can reach the goals we set for them at the beginning of the year. As the final version of my lesson was developed, I practiced and became more confident in the curriculum and my delivery.
While revising my lesson, I made sure to incorporate different processing strategies. The aforementioned graphic organizers of “Big Ideas” that I created, table discussions, and an opportunity for students to read their letter in front of the whole class. When considering deeper thinking and DOK levels for my students, I was excited and intrigued, while also challenged by time. I believe deeper thinking is more effective without the stressful constraint of time. In being new to creating lessons, I found DOK progression to be a helpful guide that pushed me to build more difficult levels of thinking and application as the lesson continued. Aligning those DOK progressions with “I do, You do, We do” was a new experience for me. Altogether, this process took time and care to write a lesson that I was confident in.
The activities that I chose (amongst the many ideas) were intended to promote active student engagement. Students were asked to fill out a “Big Idea” question as a table, prompting teamwork and peer discussions. They were asked to share what they had found with the whole class in order to complete the class graphic organizer on the projector. The students' last activity, writing a letter from a historical person’s perspective, was the most engaging. At first, there were many questions on how to start writing, as students had never been asked to think from another person’s perspective on an assignment before. Once they were given some examples, the students really went with it. At the end, they were given the opportunity to share their letters with the whole class if “they were feeling confident and brave.” Many students volunteered and were celebrated by their classmates for having courage and sharing.
The biggest takeaway for me in terms of maintaining high levels of engagement is to walk around the room. After reading some feedback given to me, I understand that my proximity really helps students stay motivated and on task. I will also continue to strive for connections between the curriculum and students’ interests. Meeting content and skill objectives is all about my ability to plan an explicit lesson and truly embrace the I do, We do, You do format.
Assessment is more than just taking a test. It is a check for understanding, a tool that informs your teaching strategies, and a way of determining your students’ unique needs. The more experience I gain in the classroom, the better I will become at aligning objectives and DOK levels with assessments. As of now, my biggest challenge is still in DOK Level 3 and Level 4 activities. Within this Social Studies lesson, I used formative assessments like thumbs up/down, think-pair-share (at tables), and a class discussion. These checks helped me determine how long we needed to spend on each activity, answer questions, and give examples to deepen understanding. The summative assessment I utilized (writing activity) showed me students' comprehension of the passage, fluency in writing, and application of knowledge to their own experiences and feelings. These assessments allowed me to reach my objectives and properly evaluate my students’ learning.
Click Here to read my full reflection and explore the activities within my lesson.
In my future teaching practice, I now understand that I won’t have time to do every activity I want within a lesson. It is best to prioritize the most effective activities that flow well and align with the standards and objectives. I think this lesson also demonstrated the power of incorporating soft skills, like Social Emotional Learning, into our lessons. When I asked students to read their letters in front of the class, it took a lot of courage because it had never been asked of them before. It was so rewarding to see their reactions to doing something new and challenging.
Going forward, I will try to pick just one objective for my lessons. I will also select activities based on how much students will get out of them. Is it engaging and connected with other parts of the lesson? Does it deepen their understanding? Does it make for easier real-world application? These are the questions I will ask myself during my future lesson planning. I am grateful for these types of experiences, my mentor, knowledge and feedback from my professors, and the students I get to teach within my fieldwork classroom. Each day, I will strive to be better than the last.