Week 11
Should we cull brumbies? - debate
Should we cull brumbies? - debate
Understand ecological and ethical aspects of brumby culling debate.
Improve persuasive argumentation, rebuttals, and presenting scientific information clearly.
I can identify evidence-based conclusions regarding the ecological impacts of brumbies in Kosciuszko National Park.
In a group situation, I can construct well-supported arguments either for or against brumby culling, using scientific evidence to substantiate claims.
🍐Brumby Debate prep Pear Deck
Active involvement in a debating team.
Literacy & research
Task Description: You are tasked with exploring both the affirmative (pro-culling) and negative (anti-culling) perspectives on the debate about culling brumbies in Kosciuszko National Park. Your goal is to gather evidence and construct a comprehensive argument outlining each side's main points.
Research Phase:
Gather Evidence:
Research and collect information on the ecological impact of brumbies in Kosciuszko National Park. Focus on factors such as grazing habits, impact on native flora and fauna, soil erosion, and water quality.
Identify scientific studies, reports, and expert opinions that support the need for culling brumbies to protect the park's ecosystem.
Explore any documented instances where brumby populations have been managed effectively in other conservation areas.
Argument Construction - Pro-Culling (Affirmative):
Construct a well-supported argument (approximately 1-2 paragraphs) advocating for the culling of brumbies in Kosciuszko National Park.
Use the evidence gathered to justify why culling is necessary to preserve native species, habitats, and the overall ecological balance.
Address potential counterarguments and provide rebuttals supported by scientific reasoning.
Argument Construction - Anti-Culling (Negative):
Construct a well-supported argument (approximately 1-2 paragraphs) against the culling of brumbies in Kosciuszko National Park.
Present reasons why culling may not be the best approach, considering ethical concerns, alternative management strategies, and potential impacts on biodiversity and cultural significance.
Support your argument with evidence from scientific research, ethical considerations, and stakeholder perspectives.