Here we go again...
In April of 2010, SLAS member Jim Melka offered up an 80mm refractor handbuilt by the late SLAS member Herb Sassenberg.
I was just beat out by a fellow ASEM member ("Missed it by that much"). Right after that I purchased what I now call the Woods scope from Jerry Loethen and that project lasted the rest of 2010.
Herb (smiling behind tailpiece) with his scope at a SLAS outreach event sometime in the mid-20th century
On December 29th 2010, Steve sent me an email asking if I wanted to buy the Sassenberg 80mm from him. My project for 2011 is going to be interesting...
Click Here for a little background history and initial rebuild status...
The scope can be broken down into four seperate sections:
The tripod is an old M17 and pretty heavy - probably around 20 to 25 pounds. Rock solid and it needs to be for the weight it has to carry. Most of the components are brass but covered in black paint. The paint will have to be stripped off.
In a word, Massive. Around 35 pounds. There are some brass components under the paint and they will be cleaned up to reveal their original finish. Herb really went all out and created very nice and readable setting circles. The dec axis even has a +/- 60 arc minute vernier. The actual dec adjustment range is only +/- 30 arc minutes.
The motor is very interesting. Normally, a shaded pole motor would be used as they startup in the same direction every time. This motor is not one of those. It can startup running in either direction. A special switch is installed that "kicks" the motor in the desired direction.
Setting circle and vernier on Dec Axis:
The lightest part of the whole scope. 10 - 15 pounds
Another 35 pounds.
· Scope:
- Aperture - 82mm
- Focal length - 54.5 inches (1384mm
- fRatio - 16.88
- Limiting mag – 12.2
- Max mag (50x/inch) – 161x
- Dawes Limit – 1.4 arc second
- Light gathering power 137x
· Finder
- Aperture – 42.5mm
- FOV = 7.5 degrees
- Magnification - unknown
Theoretical eyepiece Performance
The patina of some of the parts is beautiful. The kind of thing you see in a museum.
While cleaning up the OTA mounting bracket an amazing discovery was made.
Due to its weight and the rust under and around the mounting bracket, we thought the tube was made of cast iron. After a bit of cleaning to free up the tube I found that the tube is actually solid brass under a coat of paint. Once this is cleaned up this scope is going to be a thing of beauty. Like I said, Amazing.
OTA disassembled and the paint stripped from the tube. Rather than polish it up, I think I'll leave it with a Satin finish. It should age nicely and in another 60 years, the patina should match that of the tailpiece and objective assembly.
The OTA was mounted onto a modern day GEM (Atlas EQ-6). Seeing was pretty bad (very unstable due to cold air and city environment). Temps were in the mid 20s and transparency not much better than mag two. There was a considerable amount of moisture in the air.
Airy disk:
· Inside focus:
Rings were uniform with a hint of slight out of roundness. The outermost ring is two to three times as wide and as bright as inner rings. The center spot appeared very violet.
· Outside focus:
No rings at all. I think this means the objective is undercorrected.
Useable magnification was < 200 due to such small exit pupil above 200x (<.41mm). When using the University Optics 7mm eyepiece (199x), detail was lost due to dust motes and floaters in my eye interfering with the view.
The scope performed very well with the 8mm Astro Techs so the maximum mag so far would appear to be 174x with top end at 199x.
No "color" typical of low end or fast achromats was noted - A good sign.
The finder has a very wide 7 ½ degree field of view but low light gathering power at 42.5 mm. Few stars were seen. Lower limit appears to have been about mag four to five this night. Stars do not resolve to pinpoints at center of field. Distortion sets in about 2/3rds of the way to the edge of field. Cross hairs are very large.
Viewed several objects:
M42 – in 25mm paradigm. Fairly good detail. Not as bright as larger scopes but great contrast.
Trapezium – Three of the four trapezium stars were easily visible with the fourth needing a little effort. Soft at 174x but all four stars were visible but large.
Jupiter - Not much detail due to seeing. Brief periods allowed several cloud bands but no red spot although it was supposed to be visible.
R Leporis - Showed good red color.
M41 – Showed a few stars. Not all that impressive in Light polluted skies - Need dark skies
M35 – Takes up half the FOV of the 25mm eyepiece.
Yep, it’s an 80mm telescope alright!
I did discover a problem with this size scope: It won't take high magnification due to the very small exit pupil. And, at the opposite end (low magnification), the view is sensitive to eye position relative to the eyepiece. All due to the size of its exit pupil and my entrance pupil.
Basically here is what happens:
Using my 25mm eyepiece yeilds a magnification of 56. Exit pupil is aperture / magnification (82/56). This yields an exit pupil of 1.47 mm. My pupil size is 4.5mm dark adapted. This means the beam coming from the eyepiece is about 1/4 the diameter of my eye pupil size. This means I can not look to far off the center line of the eyepiece before the field goes black (The view is more sensitive to eye position relative to the eyepiece than in larger scopes). This is not too bad for older folk like me where our maximum pupil size is small to begin with but it is worse for younger people whose dark adapted pupil size is on the order of 7mm!
At moderate to high magnifications (say, using my 8mm Astro Tech at 174x), the exit pupil is .45mm (about 1/10 my pupil size). This is so small that the beam of light from the eyepiece is only falling on a very small part of my retina. Any dust on my lens or "floaters" in my eye blocks most of the image so I can't see much detail. Now this does not denigrate the optical quality rather it is an example of what you can expect from any optic with this high of a focal ratio. This won't bother younger people since they don't have the buildup of floaters that us old farts have accumulated.
More than 50 years later his scope might be a little lighter and using modern technology, but the true object of his efforts is still making appearances at outreach events...
.. and supporting the home team