In several key instances, the sectional issues involved arguments over states’ rights (e.g., the Tariff of Abominations, the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, the Nullification Crisis of 1832-33). One sectional issue in particular – the extension of slavery – prompted much debate in the 1840s and 1850s (e.g., the Wilmot Proviso, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act). The debate over this issue culminated with the South’s exercise of the ultimate states’ right – secession.
Look up information about the following:
What happened in 1849 that caused a mass migration to the west (California)? Do you think it was rare for a territory to get enough people to become a state in such a short time?
Explain the provisions of the Compromise of 1850 (include the Fugitive Slave Act). What made both the north and south both happy and unhappy?
In general, what are the positives and negatives about compromise?
Look back at the Missouri Compromise, why were they unable to use the terms of this compromise to settle the issue?
Opinion: Who do you think got the better end of the compromise slave states or free states. Explain your answer
Write a reaction to the Compromise if of 1850 from the point of view of the following:
A free African American living in the north
A slave owner living in the South
Abraham Lincoln
A slave