Research variables (data items) are fundamental to any research study. They represent the factors, properties, or characteristics that researchers measure, manipulate, or control to understand a phenomenon. The term variable itself originates from the Latin word variare, meaning to undergo changes or to differ from, reflecting the inherent variability of these elements. Variables can assume different values depending on the time and context of the study. Several researchers have offered insightful definitions of these crucial elements. Cristobal and Cristobal (2022) describe variables as factors or properties that researchers measure, control, and manipulate, representing changing quantities or measures; essentially, these are logical sets of attributes, characteristics, numbers, or quantities subject to measurement or quantification, often referred to as data items. Creswell (2012) similarly defines them as the dynamic attributes or traits of individuals, phenomena, locations, or events that researchers observe and measure throughout the research process. Caintic (2021) notes that variables denote the properties or characteristics of subjects under investigation, which can assume diverse values or undergo changes. Finally, Barrot (2017) defines a research variable as any measurable element or entity that can be quantified in terms of quantity and quality. These definitions collectively highlight the key aspects of research variables: their variability, measurability, and their central role in understanding relationships within a research context. In quantitative studies, the emphasis is on measuring variables and exploring the relationships between them, with the possibility of manipulating or controlling these factors to establish cause-and-effect relationships, depending on the research design.
Variables can be categorized based on what they represent. Variables related to organisms encompass characteristics of living things, including animals (age, physiological traits, temperament), plants (age, physiological traits, biochemical products), and humans (age, physiological traits, psychological traits). Variables related to materials or objects refer to the properties of non-living things, such as physical properties (length, volume, density, and weight) and chemical properties (flammability, toxicity, acidity, and pH). Finally, variables related to events or conditions describe occurrences or circumstances, including natural events (such as time, earthquake intensity, biodiversity index, and rainfall) and social events (employment rates, population density, inflation, and crime rates).
In conclusion, a thorough understanding of research variables is essential for designing and executing effective research. Researchers must carefully select, define, and measure variables to ensure the validity and reliability of their findings. The choice of variables directly impacts the research questions, the methods employed, and ultimately, the interpretations drawn from the collected data. The inherent variability of these elements is precisely what necessitates research to unravel the complexities of the world around us.
CLASSIFICATION AND TYPES OF RESEARCH VARIABLES
The foundation of any robust research study lies in the careful selection and understanding of variables. Variables, the measurable characteristics or attributes that can change or vary, are the building blocks of research, providing the framework for examining relationships, testing hypotheses, and drawing meaningful conclusions. By understanding the nuances of variables, researchers can design more effective studies, analyze data with greater precision, and ultimately contribute to a deeper understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
Experimental Research Variables
In experimental research, the independent variable (IV) is the variable that the researcher manipulates or changes. It is the presumed cause of the effect being studied, and it is independent of the subjects' behavior. The IV can be either quantitative, where values correspond to points on a real line scale, or qualitative, where values cannot be placed on a real line scale. The researcher actively chooses and sets the value of the IV, ensuring it remains independent of the subject's response. This manipulation allows researchers to observe the impact of the IV on the dependent variable. In other references, IV is known as a manipulated or explanatory variable.
The dependent variable (DV) is the outcome or effect that is measured in an experiment. It is the variable that is expected to change in response to the manipulation of the IV. The DV represents the behavior or characteristic of the subject being studied. The researcher measures the DV to determine whether there is a relationship between the IV and the DV. If a relationship exists, changes in the value of the DV will depend on the changes or manipulations made to the IV. In the literature, DV is also referred to as the response or predicted variable.
Non-Experimental Research Variables
In non-experimental research, where manipulation of variables is not feasible, the concept of predictor and criterion variables takes precedence over independent and dependent variables.
The predictor variable (PV), analogous to the independent variable in experimental studies, is the variable that is thought to influence or predict the outcome of interest. It is not directly manipulated by the researcher but is observed and measured as it naturally occurs.
The criterion variable (CV), mirroring the dependent variable in experimental research, represents the outcome or effect being studied. It is the variable that is expected to be influenced by the predictor variable. Researchers in non-experimental studies aim to understand the relationship between the predictor and criterion variables, often through correlational analysis, to determine if changes in the predictor variable are associated with changes in the criterion variable.
Variables Affecting Research Outcomes
In research, several variables beyond the independent and dependent variables can influence the study's outcome. Intervening variables, also known as mediating variables, explain the causal link between the independent and dependent variables. They act as intermediaries, clarifying how the independent variable influences the dependent variable. For example, in a study examining the relationship between stress and physical health, an intervening variable could be sleep quality, explaining how stress affects health through its impact on sleep.
Moderating variables, on the other hand, influence the strength or direction of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. They do not explain the causal link but rather modify the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. For instance, in a study examining the relationship between exercise and weight loss, age could be a moderating variable. The relationship between exercise and weight loss might be stronger in younger individuals and weaker in older individuals. Control variables, in contrast, are characteristics or values held constant during the experiment to limit their effect on the outcome. These variables are intentionally controlled because they could potentially influence the dependent variable and interfere with the analysis. By controlling for the influence of control variables, researchers can ensure that the observed changes in the dependent variable are due solely to the manipulation of the independent variable.
Confounding variables are factors that are not accounted for in the study but can change the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. These variables cannot be directly measured because their effects are difficult to distinguish from other variables. Extraneous variables are a specific type of confounding variable that are not part of the investigation but can still affect the study's outcome. These variables can introduce bias and make it difficult to draw accurate conclusions about the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Researchers strive to identify and control for confounding and extraneous variables to ensure the validity and reliability of their findings.
Variables According to the Nature of Data
Research variables can be classified based on the nature of the data they represent, broadly categorized as numeric and categorical variables.
Numeric variables, also known as quantitative variables, represent measurable quantities and answer questions about "how many" or "how much." They are further divided into continuous and discrete variables. Continuous variables can assume any value within a given range, often measured on a scale (e.g., height, weight, temperature). Discrete variables, on the other hand, can only assume whole number values within a specific range (e.g., children in a family, number of cars in a parking lot).
Categorical variables, also known as qualitative variables, represent qualities or characteristics of data units and answer questions about "what type" or "which category." They are further classified into ordinal, nominal, dichotomous, and polychotomous variables. Ordinal variables represent categories that can be logically ordered or ranked, such as educational attainment levels (e.g., high school diploma, bachelor's degree, master's degree) or levels of agreement (e.g., strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree). Nominal variables represent categories that cannot be logically ordered, such as eye color (e.g., blue, brown, green) or types of transportation (e.g., car, bus, train). Dichotomous variables represent only two categories, such as sex (male, female) or a yes/no response. Polychotomous variables represent more than two categories, such as political affiliation (e.g., Administration, Opposition, Independent) or levels of satisfaction (e.g., very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied, very satisfied).
Variables According to the Number Being Studied
The number of variables being studied in a research project can be categorized into three main types: univariate, bivariate, and multivariate. Univariate studies focus on a single variable, examining its characteristics, distribution, and trends. This type of study is often used for descriptive purposes, aiming to understand the nature of a specific phenomenon or characteristic within a population. Bivariate studies, in contrast, explore the relationship between two variables. Researchers investigate how changes in one variable are related to changes in another. This type of study allows for the investigation of potential correlations or causal relationships between the two variables. Multivariate studies, on the other hand, involve the analysis of more than two variables simultaneously. This approach enables a more complex understanding of how multiple factors interact and influence one another, resulting in a more nuanced and comprehensive view of the phenomenon being investigated.
MEASUREMENT LEVELS (SCALES OF MEASUREMENT) OF RESEARCH VARIABLES
Research variables are the measurable characteristics or attributes that are studied in a research project. They can be classified based on their relationships to one another. Variables can also be classified according to their level of measurement, which determines the type of statistical analysis that can be applied. Psychologist Stanley Smith Stevens (1946) proposed four levels of measurement:
Nominal Scale (for Nominal Data)
This is the most basic level of measurement, where data is categorized into distinct, unordered groups. For example, gender (male, female, non-binary) is a nominal variable because there is no inherent order or ranking among the categories. Statistical methods for nominal data include frequency tables and chi-square tests.
Ordinal Scale (for Ordinal Data)
This scale categorizes data into ordered groups, but the differences between categories are not necessarily equal. For example, educational attainment (high school, bachelor's, master's) is an ordinal variable because there is a clear order. Still, the difference in knowledge or skills between a bachelor's and a master's degree may not be the same as the difference between a high school diploma and a bachelor's degree. Statistical methods for ordinal data include the median and non-parametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney U test.
Interval Scale (for Interval Data)
This scale provides ordered categories with equal intervals between them, but it lacks a true zero point. For example, temperature measured in Celsius or Fahrenheit is an interval scale because the difference between 10°C and 15°C is the same as the difference between 20°C and 25°C. However, 0°C does not represent the absence of temperature. Statistical methods for interval data include the mean, standard deviation, t-tests, and ANOVA.
Ratio Scale (for Ratio Data)
This is the most informative scale, with ordered categories, equal intervals, and a true zero point. For example, height, weight, and income are ratio variables because a value of zero represents the complete absence of the measured quantity. Statistical methods for ratio data include all methods applicable to interval data, as well as the geometric mean and coefficients of variation.
CATEGORICAL VERSUS CONTINUOUS VARIABLES
The first two levels of measurement (nominal and ordinal) are also known as categorical data, while the last two (interval and ratio) are called continuous data. Categorical variables represent distinct groups, while continuous variables can take on any value within a range.
LEARNING ABOUT RESEARCH VARIABLES AND HONING VINCENTIAN IDENTITY
Several Vincentian values can be deduced from the lesson on understanding research variables, reflecting the life and teachings of Saint Vincent de Paul. Here are some:
Commitment to Knowledge and Learning
Saint Vincent de Paul emphasized the importance of education and knowledge for personal and communal growth. The lesson emphasizes the importance of understanding research variables in conducting effective research, thereby promoting a commitment to continuous learning and improvement.
Service to Others
The focus on collecting and analyzing data to understand phenomena aligns with the Vincentian value of serving the marginalized and improving their conditions. Quantitative research provides insights that can lead to better health, social policies, and community support, reflecting a commitment to social justice and the well-being of all individuals.
Empathy and Understanding
The lesson underscores the importance of accurately measuring and interpreting variables to understand human behavior and societal issues. This reflects Vincent’s belief in empathy, as researchers strive to understand the complexities of people's lives and circumstances to develop effective interventions.
Integrity and Objectivity
The emphasis on objective measurement and analysis in research resonates with the Vincentian value of integrity. Researchers must uphold ethical standards and ensure that their findings are reliable and truthful, which aligns with Vincent’s teachings about honesty and moral responsibility.
Collaboration and Community
The lesson illustrates how various fields utilize quantitative research to address complex issues, reflecting the value of collaboration. Saint Vincent de Paul advocated for collaborative community efforts to create a better society, emphasizing that collective action can lead to significant improvements in people’s lives.
Accountability
The lesson emphasizes the importance of researchers controlling for various variables to ensure valid findings. This mirrors the Vincentian value of accountability, where individuals are responsible for their actions and must strive to make decisions that positively impact others.
Social Justice
The focus on using research to inform policies and improve practices aligns with the Vincentian commitment to social justice. Understanding research variables helps identify inequities and develop solutions that promote fairness and equity in society.
By integrating these values into the practice of research, individuals can not only contribute to academic knowledge but also uphold the principles that guide Vincentian service and commitment to the common good.
This video, in Filipino, teaches about the four levels of measurement in statistics: nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data. It simplifies these concepts by explaining them from the ground up, starting with the basic distinction between categorical and numerical data.
Learn about nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data, also known as the four levels of measurement in statistics. This video explains these data levels in simple terms, starting from the basics of categorical and numerical data types.
RECOMMENDED RESOURCES
Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Data. Levels of Measurement: Explained (With Examples) by Derek Jansen (MBA). Expert Reviewed by Dr. Eunice Rautenbach. November 2020. https://gradcoach.com/nominal-ordinal-interval-ratio/
Interval Scale: Definition Characteristics with Examples by Adi Bhat. QuestionPro, n.d. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/interval-scale/
REFERENCES
Choudhury, A. (2019). Data analysis: A beginner's guide to data analysis using SPSS. Packt Publishing.Mishra, P., Singh, S. K., & Gupta, A. (2018). Research methodology and statistical analysis. PHI Learning Private Limited.Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680.