The process and result of research are meaningless without application and dissemination. Research outputs should be utilized by target users or beneficiaries (stakeholders). Research results provide valuable sources for policy ideas, organizational interventions, and program development. Therefore, a plan for disseminating research findings must be embedded in the research plan. The report to be disseminated should be effective, clear, and substantial. To achieve these results, your data must be organized and presented effectively by applying visual aids appropriately, interpreting findings accurately, and organizing data through graphics and tables.
What is a Communications Plan?
A well-defined communications plan is essential for maximizing the visibility and impact of a research project, regardless of its stage. While many researchers concentrate on communication during dissemination, when concrete findings are available, proactive planning from the proposal stage is advisable. A communications plan outlines strategies for conveying specific messages to targeted audiences. Within the Adamson University Basic Education - Senior High School department, such a plan is vital for effectively communicating research findings and their policy and practice implications to end-users and decision-makers.
Purposes of a Communications Plan
Enable researchers to systematically share their findings.
Control the timing and method of dissemination.
Engage target audiences (policymakers, practitioners, or community groups) effectively.
Monitor the impact of their communication efforts.
Venues for Disseminating Research Findings
Possible venues for dissemination of research findings include the following:
Academic Venues
International Conferences. These offer a global platform but require strong research and excellent English language skills.
Example: Presenting your research on the effects of climate change on Philippine agriculture at an international conference on sustainable development.
Local (National) Conferences. These are more accessible and often cater to specific fields.
Example: Presenting your study on the effectivenes of a new teaching method in a national conference for educators. Any association of teachers in the Philippines might be a good start.
Academic Assemblies. These could be university-level conferences or seminars within your school.
Example: Presenting your research on the historical significance of a local landmark at your school's annual research symposium.
Policy and Advocacy Venues
Congressional Hearings/ Senate Inquiries. If your research has policy implications, these can be powerful platforms. This requires careful preparations and a clear understanding of the legislative process.
Example: Presenting your research on the impact of a specific law on a marginalized community to a relevant Senate or Congressional committee.
Local Government Bodies. Local government units (LGUs) are often interested in research relevant to their communities.
Example: Presenting your research on traffic management solutions in your city to the local council.
Community-Based Venues
Professional Association Assemblies. If your research is relevant to a specific profession, presenting to their association can be very effective.
Example: Presenting your research on improving healthcare access in rural areas to the Philippine Medical Association.
Civil Society Movements. These groups often advocate for social change, and your research could support their efforts.
Example: Presenting your research on environmental sustainability to a local environmental advocacy group.
Church Groups. If your research relates to religious or ethical issues, church groups can be a relevant audience.
Example: Presenting your research on the role of faith in community development to a local church.
The Seven Building Blocks of a Communications Plan
To create a successful communications plan for disseminating research findings, there are seven building blocks to consider: goals, audience, message, formats, channels, timing, and evaluation.
Establish the Goals and Objectives
Effective communication planning starts with defining objectives distinct from the research goals. These communications objectives should be specific, focused, and clearly defined to ensure they can be achieved within the allocated time and resources.
Following SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-bound), dissemination-phase goals could include:
Influence policymakers in favor of the key findings from your research.
Collaborate with other researchers and organizations in your field.
Engage with journalists from sector-specific media.
Connect with at least three policymakers within the next eight months by providing tailored policy briefs that highlight the key findings of your research.
Identify and reach out to five relevant researchers and organizations within the next six months, sharing a one-minute explainer animation of the project findings to secure at least one partnership by the end of the year.
Identify ten suitable journalists and research their story interests. Create a press release tailored to different media outlets to secure at least two media features or articles within five months of distribution.
Define the Target Audience
After goal-setting, defining the target audience is essential, as communication strategies are tailored to audience characteristics. A detailed audience profile, created by considering the following aspects, informs subsequent planning:
Current audience knowledge;
Audience perspectives on the topic;
Audience information needs;
Knowledge gaps; and
Effective communication strategies for engagement.
CASE STUDY
In collaborating with Dr. Christie Floor de Jong on prostate cancer risk among Black men, two key audiences were identified: public health professionals and the Black community. Communication goals differed for each group. For public health professionals, the goal was to encourage partnerships with the Black community and promote peer-led interventions. For the Black community, the goal was to communicate research findings and raise awareness about prostate cancer risk and early detection. Tailored content and formats were utilized to effectively reach these audiences, including an animation for community engagement and a visual summary for public health professionals.
This is a snippet—a small piece or brief extract—of the visual summary for public health professionals to convey concise, evidence-based information. The animation aims to engage the Black community and make the message more accessible.
Articulate Key Messages for the Audience
With goals and target audiences defined, crafting key messages that resonate is the next step. These messages should encapsulate the most important findings for each specific audience. During dissemination, researchers should consider:
the most impactful findings for the audience;
elements that will pique audience interest; and
the most valuable information for the audience to retain.
CASE STUDY
Collaborating with Dr. Andrew Wallace on Modern Methods of Construction, distinct key messages were developed for different audiences. Industry professionals received messaging emphasizing the inconsistencies in MMC housing delivery and quality and strategies for improvement. Policymakers, conversely, received information focusing on the reasons for MMC's underperformance and potential policy responses.
Visit this link to understand more.
Choose the Most Appropriate Formats (Minor Publication Formats) for Dissemination
Format selection for research dissemination primarily depends on the target audience and communication context. Formats generally fall into three categories:
short formats (1-6 page documents, infographics, policy briefs, visual summaries, comics, illustrations) that provide concise key takeaways;
long formats (10+ page static or interactive reports) that allow for an in-depth understanding; and
other products (social media assets, presentations, posters, banners, media releases, animations, podcasts).
Effective dissemination strategies often integrate a combination of these formats.
CASE STUDY
In collaborating with Professor Zoe Marshman on preventing tooth decay in secondary school pupils, four distinct audiences were identified: participating students; secondary schools (teachers and authorities); academia (researchers, public health practitioners, and policymakers); and local authorities. Tailored one-page summaries with engaging visuals were created for each audience. Supplementary materials included an animation for students and a PowerPoint presentation for researchers, ensuring impactful and relevant communication across all groups.
For the animation, please take a look at this link.
The following excerpts come from the visual summaries created for secondary school students, researchers, and public health practitioners:
Use the Right Channels to Communicate
Channel selection for disseminating research findings depends on the audience's information consumption habits and preferred platforms. Potential channels include project websites, institutional sites, community workshops, social media platforms, industry publications, and events. Further channel-specific decisions may be necessary based on audience preferences and platform features. For instance, tailoring social media content to suit different platforms (e.g., LinkedIn versus Instagram) and understanding the audience is crucial for effective communication.
In our class's case, the platform is as follows. Just ask the Research Adviser to grant you access to these pages whenever you need to upload any publicity materials.
Click here to view ThesisIt's Facebook page.
Click here to view ThesisIt's Instagram page.
When to Engage to Share the Findings
With goals, audience, key messages, formats, and channels defined, strategic timing is crucial for maximizing communication impact. Researchers should consider audience engagement patterns and align communication efforts with relevant cycles (policy, academic, or industry events) to optimize outreach effectiveness.
CASE STUDY
A collaborative project with Dr. Benjamin Neimark resulted in a 12-page interactive report on the military emissions gap, featuring expert contributions. This report was effectively utilized at the Bonn Climate Conference in June 2024, providing a key platform for directly engaging policymakers and climate policy professionals.
Evaluating the Communication Efforts
A comprehensive communications plan includes a strong evaluation component, covering the measurement of activity success, the identification of areas for improvement, and the assessment of message reach. Evaluation employs quantitative metrics (sign-ups, email open rates, event attendance, social media engagement, website visits) and qualitative metrics (feedback forms, testimonials, email exchanges highlighting impact). This dual approach facilitates strategic refinement and enhancement of future communication efforts.
A well-structured communications plan greatly boosts the visibility and impact of research findings. Ideally, this process is repeated for each target audience to ensure messaging is tailored accordingly. It employs seven key components (previously outlined) to effectively engage diverse stakeholders. The timeframe for implementing the plan varies based on the number of audiences and available resources.
Here is a sample of a Research Journey Video prepared by Austria et al. (2024) for the 12SENG01 Cohort 4. This video has many areas for improvement; nonetheless, it captures the essence of a research journey video, which is to share the introduction, methodology, results, and discussions along with a summary of findings, conclusions, and recommendations of a study in an audio-video format.
CASE STUDY
Here is an example from one of our collaborations of a short format (visual summary) adapted for social media into a Linkedn Carousel.