Dear fellow teacher,
If you asked me how I used technology in my classroom before beginning my master's program in technology, I would be honest and tell you my students occasionally read on Epic or had fun on Friday with Freckle. We took our iPads to media class with us, where kids did the real learning about technology skills. My responsibilities were reading, writing, and math. Wow- that viewpoint is so out of touch with the world and what my students need from me!
Throughout my MAET coursework, and specifically this course, I've begun to reflect on how I use technology in my classroom. I'm finding through this reflection that there are so many more meaningful ways to use, discuss, and include technology in my classroom that aren't just for "fun." Students in 2025 are living with technology- it will never not be part of their lives. If we start excluding it from our classroom or making it just for "fun" we are giving up a massive teaching and learning tool. We are giving up opportunities for failure that support confidence and learning. We are giving up authenticity because the world is not devoid of technology.
Technology is important. It can guide us, help us, be used by us, connect us with others, and teach us. It is a wonderful and powerful thing! However, with all greatness comes responsibility. The meaning of the word "teacher" is "to instruct" or "to show" (Trott, 2020). It is a responsibility we take on to make sure the next generation of people are ready to engage with the world in meaningful ways that support their individual and collective well-being and success. If we want to build authentic classrooms, then we need to include authentic technology in our everyday instruction. Now, I'm not just talking about having kids use their iPads every day at school. I'm talking about the plethora of technologies and ways we interact with the world. Technology needs to be an intentional part of our everyday routines and lessons.
Distracting our students so we can "get stuff done" (we've all been there!)
A way to pass the extra time
A magic way to make everyone feel included or interested in an activity
A fix-all for accessibility for our students
A way to give learners more tools and options to be successful in an activity (shoutout to you, Universal Design for Learning!)
Different tools for activities, like an online geoboard, to maximize instructional time for materials
A platform to help students share work in meaningful ways with each other and others outside of our classroom
and so much more!
As I continue reflecting on the ways I'll use technology in my classroom next year, these ideas are just the start. I'm learning to be more committed (and reflective) to how I ensure authenticity in my classroom. I've been grateful for the opportunity to learn about innovative and inclusive technology practices, and I'm so glad I got to share it with you along the way.
Warmly,
Kait
References
Trott, Kyle D. (2020). Defining "Teacher." Virginia English Journal: Vol. 70 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.bridgewater.edu/vej/vol70/iss1/6
Almost every elementary teacher at my school has been very focused on their classroom environment in the last 2 years because of one, giant district change: flexible furniture. I have seen fellow teachers cry over the change, adapt, and argue over tables and chairs. Does it feel silly? A little. Is it understandable? Very! The way we design our learning spaces is a deeply personal and intentional process. Every routine and independent skill is impacted by where students are and how they use their space. Yet, it's still not an exact science and many teachers are polar opposites on how they set up their classrooms.
Before our district adopted (and shelled out millions of dollars for) flexible furniture, I was a HUGE advocate for it. I interned in a flexible seated classroom, and I loved it! There were tables and chairs still, but my mentor teacher also had rocking floor seats, a table low to the ground, and several exercise balls for students to use. She even had a couch! Everything was so well managed that when I got my own classroom, there was no question I would be doing it too! My experience has taught me that "flexible" can mean so many things. These past two years, I have had to be as flexible as the furniture while I figure out what works!
My goal for my classroom was a space that was calm. I tried to pick calm, but happy colors for my room. I attempt to only hang up things that are meaningful and useful to students. These things mainly include anchor charts, student work, and a calendar. Through this process I've also come to understand that my opinion about our classroom is important, but it isn't the only opinion.
February 2025, rearranging my flexible furniture for the 4th time that year (note that the blue chairs behind me move all around the room when they get used!)
August 2024, my first classroom set up of my new flexible furniture
August 2023, setting up my very first classroom with my own version of flexible seating
One of the very hardest first things I learned was that flexible furniture was extremely collaborative. This is great! Constructivist ideas really are at work in flexible furniutre, as students can learn, collaborate, and form new knowledge together. It takes the teacher-centeredness of so many classrooms and lessens it for the better. For a second grade classroom, so many activities are discussion based and require working together... except when they don't. I realized quite quickly that it was hard for some students to focus when they were sitting with 12 of their friends, rather than 2 or 3 other kids at a time. This led to my first rearranging less than 3 weeks into the school year. While I value collaboration, I know my students are capable of it and what they needed was a bit more space for what they were still learning: indepenent work. They were failing less, relying on other kids more, and some quit participating whole group all together!
The next challenge was small group work. So many teachers were so upset about having to "give up" their beloved kidney tables. Some of them even tried to keep them before they realized there wasn't enough physical space in their rooms to do so. I had no qualms about it- I slapped a red sticker on mine and said goodbye! Then, about 4 weeks into the fall, I stumbled on my mistake. I had a large class size, something I forgot to consider, and though my furniture was new and shiny, there was not enough of it. I had to use every available thing that could be a seat as a seat. I had no group table. For a few weeks, I had to ask students to move from a table around the room to use for small groups. It just wasn't working. I finally took one afternoon to bring it up to my students as a problem that needed solving, and boy did they solve it! They found places that could be seats in the room that I hadn't even comsidered. They helped maximize countertops, benches, and bookshelves- and they loved sitting there. They were honest if something wasn't going to work for them and they even came up with choosing a better structure for when they picked their spots. Go team!
This is when I started to realize that the problems weren't just impacting my teaching, but also their learning. I started including my students more in the decision making process of our classroom and how it looked and felt. We started moving things a bit more often, and I was often impressed by their flexible solutions to problems I felt like were unsolvable. We even drew maps of furniture configurations we thought would work nicely. We discussed what was important to us in how our room looked, and felt, and there were less arguments overall about where kids sat when.
I know at this point what you must be thinking, because I thought it too: Kait, no way. I did the same thing as I sat in the first fall professional development of our flexible furniture and heard pilot teachers speak out about it. I didn't believe them. Looking back now, I wish I had taken their advice to get kids involved a bit sooner in the process. The problem-solving skills, responsibility, and community moving our furniture around together built within my classroom is something I won't forget!
Draw some maps together, ask your students to point out some problem spots in the room that they notice (for example: no group table! Or, we can't walk through here easily!). I promise that it will make your classroom a better place to be, and you don't have to take every piece of student input- let it be a discussion you have together. Bring up why a solution may or may not work for them and let them think about it.
It takes time, but it's worth it.
Next year, I'm looking forward to a smaller class size and making some changes to support collaboration AND individual work skills. Below are some mock-ups of my current room, and what I'd like to do with it this upcoming fall. I've learned that it always feels different when kids are actually in the space, and flexible furniture requires us all to be a bit flexible ourselves!
Mockups created using floorplanner: https://floorplanner.com/demo
In my current classroom, I had to use every available seat for students for the majority of the year. I lacked a good group space, and I was breaking some rules (bookshelves in front of the heating and cooling registers)
In the start of the fall, this is my current plan for setting up. It is not super different but it inlcudes a few intentional and important changes. The table in the top right will be an official small group table- not everyday student seating. I also made a "book nook" to unblock the heating registers per district policy. I switched around our blue rocking chairs to be against the wall in the back, as kids get frustrated that they move around the room all day. I also created more opportunties for 1 or 2 kids spots (the bench in the library) instead of making more tables of 4-5 kids.
I'm excited to meet my new students, but I'm even more excited to see what changes we make in our room together. Flexible furniture, while it comes with it's challenges, has taught me a lot about student-centered learning spaces. I'd say it's worth the hype- and I'm fortunate to be part of a distrcit that believes that, too.
Every educator eventually gets to the point where the millions of little choices they make in a single lesson start to feel natural. When we step back and give ourselves opportunities to reflect on these choices, we not only give ourselves a chance to celebrate the incredible work we do, but we also make the lesson more effective than it already is.
Intentionality is something you will see show up frequently in my blogs, and for this one, I want to give you a peek into how purposeful each learning experience is crafted. I want this to be a great resource to examine your own process of reflection and iteration when you craft lessons, too!
I recently created a lesson around a cross-cutting science concept my students were not yet demonstrating: identifying cause and effect relationships. I used my innovative technology I've been learning about in my continued graduate learning to create an inquiry-based experience to practice this skill. The technology I used is called Makey Makey, and it is a circuit system that also offers you access to many different ways to test and use the circuit. I thought this would be a perfect way to investigate cause and effect, because it allows students to change one variable at a time (a cause) and see an observable outcome (an effect!). If you want to read through this lesson or use it in your own classroom, you can view it and a more in-depth version of my iterative process here.
While this lesson is fun and engaging, the main event of this post isn't the lesson itself but rather the process of creating it that was so special. In my graduate learning opportunities, I have the privilege of receiving feedback from a range of individuals with different identities, backgrounds, and teaching expertise to really help me in my process of lesson creation. Some challenges they gave me in this lesson were accessibility for all students and the importance of choice in the learning process. These two things work incredibly well together, and so I began the process of iteration.
One important consideration for this lesson was that it was created with a Universal Design for Learning framework, but at the beginning, my lesson could only be loosely categorized that way. It lacked choice and intentionality until my peers pointed that out. Universal Design for Learning in science education has been studied and proven that when implemented with vitality, it has a postive impact on student outcomes. "The more modalities a teacher aims to stimulate during science instruction, the greater the opportunity for diverse learners to receive and process the information, relate it to their own experiences, make connections to prior understandings, and construct new knowledge." (Basham & Marino, 2013). One of my first big realizations was that my lesson lacked modalities, especially in the area of assessment. With so many resources for this in my district, I came up with the plan to revise the assessment to be written, speech-to-text, or a video reflection answering the question and posted to our classroom seesaw (an engaging favorite in room 5!)
First considerations for assessment (without choice)
A second consideration of assessment with multiple modalities to demonstrate learning
Another frequently commented on portion of my lesson was my learner population and the ways I was thinking about supporting their differing needs. Another key characteristic of Universal Design for Learning is "planning for learner variability, teachers should take into account specific considerations such as individual and group strengths, weaknesses, abilities, understanding of background knowledge, and motivation for participating in the learning" (Curry, 2006). This research made me consider how I planned to group students. This is something we tend to do quickly or naturally, yet it has a really profound impact on learning. I started to really consider my learners' needs during learning and realized I have some very specific ways I can support them through their groups. Some of my students are multilingual and still in the process of becoming comfortable speaking in English, so I aimed to group them with kids who I know would include them and they get along well with in their groups. I also have some kids with learning differences and attention challenges, so I made sure there was a strong leader in their group who could help them stay on task. While at first I didn't feel the need to write these choices down, later I realized that doing so makes every step of the learning process malleable to support each unique learner.
First considerations of my learners
A second, more in depth consideration of all my learners' major needs
While there were also some suggestions I did not implement (hello, trying to teach 2nd graders to use new software and a new circuit system- out of my patience level!), feedback is a really incredible tool. If you don't already have someone to help you in your lesson planning process, this experience has taught me a quick trick to check my lessons that I want to share with you: The Rule of Three.
Are there 3 different ways my students can demonstrate an understanding of this measurable objective?
Are there 3 different ways I could group students to support their needs?
These two quick considerations can help make sure lessons are accessible and there is built-in choice, which further supports student engagement and positive learning outcomes.
References
Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM education and supporting students through Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500401
Curry, C., Cohen, L., & Lightbody, N. (2006). Universal Design in Science Learning. Science Teacher, 73(3), 32.
Jav, H., Hussain, M. A., & Tufail, M. (2024). Effect of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Embedded Project on 5th Grade Students' Academic Achievement in Science Subject. Bulletin of Education and Research, 46(2), 93.
Jay Silver and Eric Rosenbaum. Makey Makey. JoyLabz LLC. https://makeymakey.com/pages/plug-and-play-makey-makey-apps?srsltid=AfmBOoq92zmD2RN0y_0Y57Q_2BcFKKBj1MCAaxKiOx8LmwVPl_4V5JNF
Silver, J., & Rosenbaum, E. (2012). Plug and play Makey Makey Apps. Makey Makey Plug and Play Apps. https://makeymakey.com/pages/plug-and-play-makey-makey-apps
Attribution: template on canva by @amapola https://www.canva.com/s/templates?query=infographic
Content by Kait Woods
Failure is a fact - and a skill - of life. But who gets room to fail? We often give children and the elderly space to fail. What other identities get to fail? Generally, failure is more accepted when you have privilege. I believe the very core of privilege could be defined as the space to fail without consequence. As educators, we need to deeply consider who we give space to fail to. All intersecting identities deserve space to learn and fail. Intersectionality is the mix of identities one individual may hold (Vahabzadeh, n.d.) More often than not, we can be setting double standards when it comes to failure by celebrating certain failures in our classrooms and condemning others. Ask yourself- do you celebrate the effort of everyone who fails in your classroom? I know and can recall times I haven't this year.
Check out this quick infographic about failure and intersectionality I made using Canva this week to share with my fellow staff (and you!).
References
Vahabzadeh, A. (n.d.) Intersectionality [Video]. Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/social-inequality/social-class/v/intersectionality
Doom scrolling by insomniac_system on imgflip https://imgflip.com/i/7vbjg2
I always feel like an old lady (at the ripe age of 25) when someone asks me if I "saw that tiktok" or "looked at that reel" that they sent me. It is a bit awkward when I tell them I don't use tiktok or instagram regularly anymore.
While some of my own personal views play a part of not engaging with scroll-worthy media, more than anything it is for my own mental health. I found myself in something called a "filter bubble" seeing people who were in the same life stage as me, yet seemingly doing so much better! I became frustrated with my life, my progress, my accomplishments... and I spiraled. I was constantly comparing my life to the very best moments of other people's lives and I started to ask myself: what is this gaining me? The answer I came up with was honest and harsh... nothing good!
Don't get me wrong, this is not true for everyone and all media. Media can be an incredible tool to connect, build, and create together. However, how we use it matters most. Since my spiral, I'm back on my feet with a once a month only check of instagram, and rarely I go on tiktok for a dinner reciepe or if my sister sends me something hilarious.
Now, I opt for more collaborative and creative media spaces like canva, Microsoft Teams, and even just texting group chats to stay up to date with my close friends and family (trust me- it feels more personal that way too!). I find that this personally is the most rewarding use of media for me and my goals. I waste less time, feel better about myself, and and more connected with those around me than before.
If you're like me, it took me awhile to noticed how social media was impacting me. If that is you, here are some resources you can use to keep track of media consumption.
RESOURCES:
Iphone Feature: Screen Time (iOS)
Chrome Extension: StayFocusd
Other apps to consider: Freedom or Rescue Time to track and limit media consumption
Media can be an incredible tool. I believe it is our responsibility as educators to know how to use it, know how it can be helpful or harmful, and educate our kids with it. That takes knowing media- but also knowing the power it can hold.
Image created by ChatGPT
Failure is a fact of life. Failing happens (if you’re me, daily!). As people, we learn to navigate failures and can wield them to become powerful learning opportunities. This is not an innate skill! It takes practice, setting aside pride, and is a learned behavior. As educators, failure is a core skill we need to teach to create deep learning environments. When you can fail forward, not only do you acquire a sense of belonging, but you also learn how to learn. This idea fits into constructivist principles that you can find nestled in other corners of this blog!
Constructivism is the act of learning through doing, and consequently, failing. When we investigate a question in science, use a prompt to explore a writing assignment, or try to solve open-ended questions in math, we are participating in constructing our learning. By not being a finite answer-only classroom, we can encourage kids and fellow educators to take risks and grow! When you have a 50/50 shot of getting the answer correct, you also have a chance of not knowing the actual content to be correct at all. Constructivism encourages the idea that by solving problems and not having a perfect answer, we create more learning opportunities along the way in our process of discovery. We learn through doing, and by doing, we are likely to fail!
So, how, as educators, can we encourage failure? How can we build a safe environment where mistakes can be celebrated and navigated? We can start by making it acceptable to be wrong. These are the three main principles I design my classroom community and learning activities with:
#1 Participation
I know there are a PLETHORA of boomers that complained about the “blue ribbon philosophy,” where you get an award just for trying. But what is so wrong with celebrating effort? When we celebrate the EFFORT rather than the OUTCOME, we encourage students to keep giving that effort. We foster a work ethic and belonging. We can still celebrate those who clearly did a phenomenal job and tried hard, but shouldn't trying be the main celebratory qualifier? Think about how this idea fits with your current classroom. Our students celebrated for trying- or do you just move on to the next when you hear a wrong answer? I know I’m guilty of this at times!
#2 Discovery
All too often, students are asked questions with a right and wrong answer. The same kids are right most often, and the same few kids are always wrong. Think about how that feels, especially when being wrong is not celebrated. When we navigate more open-ended tasks together without affirming a right answer, we set students and ourselves up for successful failures- problems that can be solved with a different solution! Examples of closed-ended tasks. What if instead of “solve 8=7” we said “think of all the different ways you can make 15.” All of a sudden, your always right students can stretch themselves a bit, while your mostly wrong students can find an accessible answer to participate in the discussion. Everyone is included. Everyone has the opportunity to learn.
#3 Celebration
What if we celebrated all kids who participate with us? What if we put wrong answers up and navigated them together? What if we celebrated kids not based on what they can easily do, but what they try to do that might be just out of reach? Creating an environment that celebrates creates a sense of belonging. What if instead of saying “not quite!” we said, “Wow! What a brave answer!” when kids were right wrong. What if we gave a little more of our center stage away to kids who can lead discussions well and kindly? What if instead of becoming the place where kids soak up attention and pride from, that came from inside themself? That would be a classroom worth celebrating. Those students would learn to celebrate themselves.
If these three values shape our classroom culture, my hope is that students will carry more than just knowledge with them when they leave—they’ll carry confidence. That’s the foundation I’m trying to build.
Will you build it with me?
References
OpenAI. (2021). GPT-3 Language Model [Computer software]. Retrieved May 25, 2025, from https://openai.com/api/
What is attribution? Why is it important for us? When do you attribute or not? The world of ethical citation is complex and can feel overwhelming. There are so many rules and laws! There is one golden standard that can help us, though: Attribution is for Everyone.
In this video, I discuss the importance of attributing to the sources we use to create our content, even if and when it is considered fair use!
Attribution has both ethical and legal concerns tied to it. When you don't attribute, you can face big problems like lawsuits if something is copyrighted. It's also unethical not to attribute, even when the source of the information is considered fair use.
There are also other implications of educators not attributing- we create so often. We teach students to have integrity, to cite their sources, and we too have to stick to this same set of standards. We cannot set the standards high unless we're willing to meet them, too.
The only time you don't have to attribute or cite is when something is considered public domain. Even then, it's good and respectful practice to attribute. Attribution is for everyone!
I practice what I preach by attributing to my sources below. Check it out! I hope it is helpful.
Mountain Calm by Universfield https://freesound.org/s/770194/ License: Attribution 4.0
Kindness by Random Acts of Kindness Foundation and Giant Ant Art by Chris Anderson https://vimeo.com/261161322?share=copy License CC-BY-NC
Ida Cartoon by Ida Pulicani https://vimeo.com/95653609 CC Attribution Non-Commercial
Ida gouette a6 by Ida Pulicani https://vimeo.com/95653609 CC Attribution Non-Commercial
Attribution by Kait Woods on Wevideo CC-BY-NC 4.0