Bring-Your-Own-Brunch 12-1, Open Space Discussion 1-2:30 @ TVUUC
Free child care services provided
View/Add to Calendar - Printable Flyer
For April's ForUUm we'll be discussing the theory of Primal World Beliefs.
Primal World Belief theory is the idea that your basic beliefs about whether the world is good or bad have a significant impact on how you experience your life.
"It’s easy to see how your perceptions of your immediate surroundings impact your behavior. For example, if you see a place as a dangerous battleground, you become alert and suspicious. Your body gets ready for fight or flight. If you see a place as a playground, you play. You get curious. You make friends.
What if you saw the whole world as a battleground?
Just like beliefs about local contexts, people’s primal world beliefs might impact us too, but constantly—because people never leave the world. If so, then primals could influence depression, success, optimism, wellbeing, extroversion…honestly most life outcomes people care about. " --from MyPrimals.com
Our ForUUm discussion will focus on how we each see the world, and how these beliefs impact our emotional lives and the ways we interact with society.
Please take the Primal World Beliefs Survey to see how you score on the 26 primals and use this to inform the discussion.
Videos and materials are shared for the purpose of inviting participants into open discussion, and are not endorsed by or representative of TVUUC.
This chart shows the 26 primal world beliefs, and how they group into three main categories (Safe vs. Dangerous, Enticing vs. Dull, and Alive vs. Mechanistic) with a "Good vs. Bad" version of each.
From the MyPrimals.com website:
Subsequent research has confirmed that, in general, all 26 primal world beliefs are:
Stable: Primals can change but in practice they are as stable across time as personality traits like extraversion. This means many people likely spend decades holding the same world beliefs.
Hidden: Primals are not that related to demographic factors. For example, people who are rich do not see the world as more abundant than people who are poor. Men don’t see the world as safer than women. This means you can’t tell someone’s primals by looking at them.
Correlated: Primals are correlated to how we live our lives and our mental health. For example, Safe world belief is very strongly correlated to trust and less depression. Enticing is very strongly correlated to curiosity, gratitude, and happiness. Alive is strongly correlated to spirituality and having purpose in life. This means that, across a wide range of behaviors, humans act rationally given their primals.
In this study that correlated political affiliation with Primal World Beliefs, researchers found that both liberals and conservatives had similar distributions of good/bad world beliefs.
Many would intuitively guess that conservatives tend see the world as more dangerous, but this wasn't the case. The primal most strongly correlated with conservative views was the "hierarchical" primal, one of the 5 "neutral primals" that don't break down on "good vs. bad" lines.
The Hierarchy Theory shows how the six primals that most strongly correlate with conservative and liberal politics form an overall narrative about change and inequality.
Jonathan Haidt is the most famous researcher at the UPenn Positive Psychology department, where Primal World Belief theory was developed.
Here is a short video describing the Happiness Hypothesis and the general principles of what contributes most to a happy life.
A few videos that describe and discuss Primal World Belief theory.
Some questions to help get the conversation going!
What surprised you the most about the results of your Primal World Beliefs survey?
Do you think that Primal World Beliefs provides a good model for understanding the differences in how we see the world?
Do you have any questions or criticisms of the research?
What are some examples of hierarchical thinking that you have seen in political discourse?
Is it possible to change your primal world beliefs? Is it desirable?
How are religions and other spiritual practices influenced by primal world beliefs?
Does the concept of an omnibenevolent God help people see the world as inherently good?