Power is often spoken about as a singular thing, when there are many different types of power relations which result in different power dynamics. When referring to issues involving the power dynamics within or between groups (i.e. more than two people), we often use the word 'structural' to describe these issues. Structural issues require a broader perspective than interpersonal interactions.
In this iteration (Mar 2022) of the Library of Care, we only talk about this briefly, though we hope to expand this information to apply to structural and organisational issues in the future.
In the sections before this, we have mostly been looking from the perspective of the individual. In some situations, however, an individual might feel powerless to change their situation. Although working on knowing ourselves can help us draw boundaries and fulfil our needs, sometimes there is little or no space for us to advocate for ourselves, without negative consequences. We have listed some examples of power dynamics below.
There are five ways in which people can wield ‘power over’ ✊ others:
✨ referent power
Leaders who are charismatic and well-liked wield referent power. Followers base their self-esteem and sense of accomplishment on the leader’s approval. They want to work harder because the leader is famous and well-liked, and they want to be accepted and valued by the leader.
🎓 expert power
Leaders with expert power are depended upon for their specialised skills, knowledge and abilities. Followers assume that the leader has superior skills and they depend upon the leader to wield these skills and knowledge instead of learning for themselves.
🏰 legitimate power
Leaders with legitimate power are those with formal authority to control others. This power relies on position in an institution or governing body. An example of positions which hold legitimate power are arts council managers or programmers in arts venues.
🎁 reward power
Leaders with reward power are those who can control access to benefits. If followers believe that these rewards are valuable and fair, reward power is effective. If reward power is overused, the relationship becomes transactional.
🚨 coercive power
Leaders with coercive power control through punishment. They have the ability to disperse punishment and withhold resources or emotional support. Coercive power is often used to prevent bad behavior and when compliance is absolutely necessary, such as during a crisis situation.
Leaders can use multiple ways to exert power over others. Besides ‘power over’, there are other ways to look at power dynamics. Four of those mentioned by Elizabeth Talbot include:
✊ Power Over
Power Over is the power to hire and fire a person, an example of such a relationship is the typical employer-employee one.
👐 Power With
Power With means sharing power with a group of people through making shared decisions and acting together. An example of such relationships are those which prioritise communication and collective decision-making.
👉 Power To
Power To refers to groups that rotate roles regularly without a clear leader. Everyone plays a different role and they learn to play new roles as time passes.
💗 Power Within
Power Within is self-empowerment. It is related to Power With and Power To, because each individual has to feel valued by themselves and the group in order to learn new things and make decisions together with others.
In the most traditional sense, Power Over is the usual way that we run our organisations and nations. However, as people have become more aware of the potential of humans to grow continuously, we see more places implementing Power With and Power To. Can you think of any examples in your life that Power With and Power To have been used?
Further reading:
https://sustainingcommunity.wordpress.com/2019/02/01/4-types-of-power/
https://www.participatorymethods.org/method/power
https://www.powercube.net/other-forms-of-power/expressions-of-power/
Reflective Questions
NOTE: Reflective questions can feel intense! If you find yourself feeling overwhelmed or tired, please feel free to take a break or leave the section altogether. Alternatively, you can simply skim past the questions to get a feel of them without answering each individual question. Ultimately, these questions are for you: take what you need and leave what you don't! :)
Here are some questions you can ask yourself to get a sense of the power dynamics present in different contexts in your life, and we offer this list as something that you can keep coming back to over time, as power can shift over time as things change and different events happen.
We'd suggest that you only pick one or two questions to reflect on at a time, depending on what questions resonate with you at the present moment, and that you give yourself 10-15 minutes at least to think through your answers to the questions. You may also want to ask a friend to do this together with you, so you can hear someone else's responses and/or have some support to articulate and clarify your answer, and/or to write your answers so that you can easily return to them at a future point in time (:
Another point to note is that the kind of power you hold may be different from context to context - 'power within' as a person for instance is slightly different from 'power within' as an arts practitioner / in my practice. Depending on your interest and capacity, it could be helpful to respond to these questions both in general as well as in 1 or max 2 other specific contexts.
What kind of power dynamics do I feel most comfortable with in what contexts?
If you prefer to use Power Over, what kinds of thoughts make you uncomfortable with Power With or Power To?
Have I experienced Power With and Power To before? In what situations?
Do I feel Power Within in my work and personal contexts?
Am I aware of what type of Power Over situations I am entering when I start a new job? Am I the one exercising Power Over others? How am I doing so?
We use 'facilitator' here in quite a loose way - it can refer to being formally hired or acknowledged as a facilitator in a project, or it can refer to being informally someone who is trying to move things along in a group context. Within an arts collective for instance, where there is likely no clear 'leader' or 'head', everyone is probably facilitating the collective's conversation to some degree.
As noted in the earlier section, the power you hold may be different from context to context, so it can be worth taking some time to reflect on your power relations as a facilitator. Apart from applying this lens to the questions above, here are some additional questions that you might find helpful to reflect on the positionalities and power dynamics involved in the group.
It can be challenging to facilitate conversations around power. Some of the following questions might not be suitable for a group conversation and it is important that everyone consents to participating in the conversation, and also that the environment provides opportunities for participants to comfortably decline sharing if they do not feel like doing so.
Are the power dynamics clear in the room? Who has power? How did they get it?
a) Yes. The power dynamics are clear and the group is comfortable with them.
b) Not quite. We assume that power is fully shared but have never discussed it.
c) Yes, but people don’t think it's necessarily fair, or know how to change it.
d) No, and the power that is present is used to delay action rather than move it.
Does anyone work at the same organisation?
Does anyone work for or supervise someone in the group?
Does anyone have a romantic history or present relationship with someone in the group?
Does anyone have shared trauma or history of harm with someone in the group?
Do most of the participants know each other?