we should not close CT before closing peer review.
we should not close CR before all CTs under that CR closed.
Change Management:
problem report - Change request / Work Package
airspeed ===> HLR-ARCH-LLR-SOURCE CODE - EOC
Change Request CR
Change Tasks CT
----------------release-------------------------- version control-------------
v1.0
v2.0
v3.0
v4.0
v5.0
-------------------------------------------------------
math.c ==> v1.0 ==> v2.0 ==> v3.0 ======> v100.0 (configuration management tools - SVN)
-------------------------------------------------------
change control or change management (JIRA, Clear Quest, etc.)
CCB ==> change control board - dev lead, ver lead, systems engr, safety engineer, quality lead etc.
CR1
CT1 - HLR (srinu)
CT2 - ARCH (srinu)
CT3 - LLR (srinu)
CT4 - SOURCE CODE (srinu)
CT5 - LLT (hari)
CT6 - HLT (hari)
CT7 - RBTCA (sravani)
CT8 - SCA (sravani)
CR2
CR3
.
.
.
CR100
---------------------Project CR/CT structure-----------------
CR1 - development
CT1 - HLR (srinu)
CT2 - ARCH (srinu)
CT3 - LLR (srinu)
CT4 - SOURCE CODE (srinu)
CR2 - LLT
CT1 - LLT TC (hari)
CT2 - LLT TP (hari)
CT3 - LLT TR (hari)
CR3 - TCA
CT1 - RBTCA (sravani)
CT2 - SCA (sravani)
---------------------
System requirement <==> HLR <==> LLR <==> Source Code (development traceability)
LLR <==> TC <==> TP <==> TR (Verification Traceability)