Aortic Stenosis (M/A)

Aortic Stenosis (MA48)

-Classify by Valvar, Subvalvar, Supravalvar


VALVAR AORTIC STENOSIS


Epi

-Bicuspid Ao valve and other minor malformations are common and often unapparent as a kid

-Bicuspid Ao valve occurs in 1.3% of people

-AS is 3-8% of CHD seen in infants (and 0.8% of infants have CHD)

-Only 2% of pt w a congenitally AbNl Ao Vlv will have signif stenosis or regurge by teens, though a high percent will have progressive vlv dysfx later on and need surgery by adult life

-60-75% of congen AS is valvar. M>F (3-5:1).

-Assoc xx- VSD, CoAo, PDA

-Valvar AS incr risk w Turner synd, Jacobsen synd; some genetic basis for it...


Path

-Ao vlv dvp fr 3 swellings (ridges) of subendocardial tissue formed when the Ao-Pulm septum divides the bulbus cordis and truncus arteriosus. Each ridge undergoes cavitation (hollowing) to form thin, smooth, pliable leaflets and the sinus of valsalva.

-Nl valve has 3 pocketlike cusps, equal in size, with Nodules of Arantii- a fibrous nodule at center of the free edges of each semilunar cusp, that meet in the center of when the valve closes.

-The valve is surrounded by a fibrous ring where the cusps attach

-Stenosis occurs w decreased orifice size fr thickened and increased rigidity of valve leaflets

-Bicuspid Ao Valve (#1 cause)- only 2 cusps bc partial/complete fusion of 2 of the Ao valve cusps, +/- central fibrous bridge (raphe) at the fusion site

-Very variable- how conjoined are they, cusp size/equality, central or eccentric orifice

-75%- R&L cusps are conjoined; rest are mostly R+noncoronary cusp

-Unicuspid valve- >1cusp is fused--> slit like orifice only

-All 3 cusps fused w only a small orifice

-No cusp fusion but hypoplastic annulus--> AS

-Myxoid dysplasia of a tricuspid nonfused valve- uncommon

-Calcification, fibrosis, lipid accum'n, inflmy changes, myxomatous degen'n, annular dilat'n, acquired fibrotic fusion of true commissures all can cause AS

-Ca'ion- rare in kids/teens, but ~ universal in old ppl w Ao vlv AS

-Fibrosis & Lipidosis incr w time--> thick stiff cusp w AS

-Fibrosis at the fusion site--> impaired valve opening

-Some pt w valve xx--> cystic medial necrosis--> weakened Asc Ao--> annular dilation and dilation/aneurysm of Asc Ao--> incr risk dissection/rupture, independent of the degree of AS. Annular dil'n assoc w AR. ?etiology of the dilation, but Fibrillin1 content in the wall is reduced, and metaloproteinase2 activity increased.

-AS--> Pressure OD--> LVH and myocardial fibrosis seen w AS; can --> much endomyocardial fibroelastosis and pap muscle infarct in infant w sev AS. Can also occur in ASx child w moderate congen AS.



Physiology

-LVOT obstruction--> inc LV AL.

-Nl pt: SBP @LV = SBP @Asc Ao

-AS: LV SBP > Asc Ao SBP w ejection bc decr effective area of Ao vlv orifice

-If Nl SV, then manitude of the P gradient reflects severity of AS

-LVH to compensate for incr AL (see law of LaPlace) --> maint Nl LV wall stress despite incr pk sys P

-SV, CO, baseline HR, EF all remain Nl (usually), though contractility is decr, and LVED Vol and Pressure is incr if severe symptomatic AS

-LV subendocardial ischemia and infarct can occur, even if coronaries are unobstructed, bc myocardial demand of the hypertrophied LV is increased, and cor Q isn't enough.

-Assess w Diastolic Pressure Time Index (DPTI)= (mean diastolic grad bn LV and Ao) x (diastolic length) = area bn Ao and LV pressure curves during diastole = ~O2 supply; Myocardial

O2demand can be estimated by Systolic Pressure Time Index (SPTI)= area under LV P curve during systole.


-Ratio of DPTI:SPTI can be sued to quantify O2 supply/demand ratio of LV


Ischemia/Infarct w AS:

-Intramyocardial compressive forces are greatest at subendocardium & it is farthest from epicardial cor arts--> subendocardium and pap muscles most at risk for ischemia/infarct.

-DO2 may be enough for rest, but w exercise--> ischemia.

-Sev AS pts may have near max cor dilation at rest, so little reserve for stress

-HR incr--> reduced DO2/VO2 bc it decr both systole and diastole time, and SV only increases minimally. Since the LV must eject the SV over a shorter period, the LV sys P increases--> inc VO2. Shortened diastole--> decr cor Q. Systemic vasodilation w exercise--> decr SVR--> decr DBP--> decr coronary Q ==> incr risk of subendocardial ischemia/infarct w exercise


Sx/Dx

-Most ASx as child, w Nl growth/dvp

-Sx = fatigue, DOE, angina pectoris, syncope. 15% w mild AS and 31% w sev AS get easy fatigability

-Angina and syncope only occur in <10% of pt w sev AS, even if >80mmHg grad (pk to pk)

-if +AS/syncope--> likely sev AS, so eval quickly!


PE:

-usually Nl v/s, unless sev AS w CHF

-Nl apical impulse if mild AS, incr w sev AS

-presystolic tap = forceful atrial contraction - c/s elevated LVEDP

-suprasternal notch thrill- + in 85% of pt w valvar AS

-precordial thrill usually + in pt w mod-sev AS

-Nl S1; S2 might not split if sev AS bc of prolonged LV ejection (so A2 is close to P2), though usually S2 has normal split even if sev.

-S4 + if sev AS w LV diast dysfx and high EDP

-S3 si common in kids/teens w Nl heart, but frequently heard w AS

-SEM: cresc-decresc fr AS- loudest at RUSB or LUSB (young kids), w rad to neck over carotids bilat. Louder/harsher, later pk SEM = worse AS. Often w early systolic ejection click, loudest at LLSB/apex

-unlike a pulm valve ejection click, there's no change w resp'n

-+ejection click & + suprasternal notch thrill--> c/s valvar AS strongly

-if AR, then diastolic decresc murmur


ECG:

-LVH by voltage criteria if sev AS

-if pk to pk grad is >80mmHg, then ECG might be Nl in 1/3 pt

-LVH on ECG does NOT correlate to LV mass by MRI in pt w AS (!!)

-not good to check severity of AS

-ST depression and T wave inversion at L precordials (=strain pattern) & LVH is specific for sev AS, but low Sn

-Holter might show ventricular arrhythmias- strong assoc w ventric arrhythmia and sudden death


Rads:

-CXR: Nl or min enlarged heart; apex rounded; post displacement of silhouette on lateral = LVH. LAE = sev AS if there, as is Si CHF- pulm congestion. Big Asc Ao in older kids


Exercise Testing:

-Sev AS correlates w exercise capacity, SBP response, and signif ST depression during exercise

-but low Sn & Sp, not very useful

-ST changes rep subendocardial ischemia...

-if pt has borderline Si/Sx to intervene, check an exercise test and intervene if +ST changes

-Exercise Doppler echo- >18mmHg incr in mean Doppler grad w exercise (compared to rest) --> incr risk of cardiac event

Echo Doppler:

-PSLA- see decreased valve mobility & systolic doming of the cusps

-check Ao valve annulus diam

-PSSA- see valve cusp and commissures, see bicuspid valve w conjoined cusps; may look tricuspid during diastole so check valve motion bc they may open w fish mouth appearance

-Check LV mass and systolic fx

-TEE: if cant get good TTE pics, espec if c/s Ao valve endocarditis, and to check valve morph/mech of dysfx pre and postop (and w weaning from CPB)

-Doppler- confirm obstruction, check degr of stenosis. Flow is rapid (incr pk v) bc of fixed SV ejected thru a small orifice...; delta P = v^4

-Doppler pk to pk gradient is diff than cath derived bc the pk P of Ao occurs after the LV pk P is reached. Pk instantaneous gradient is higher than the pk to pk grad, and they are not interchangeable.


-Mean Sys P grad- calculated from the doppler, correlates well w the mean P grad from cath

-States of incr SV or Contractility --> higher P gradient.

-Pt w very sev obst can --> AbNl'ly low myocardial systolic fx--> low CO--> low P gradient

-so many want to use valve area calculations rather than P grad to gauge severity of obst

-Ao Valve Area- Continuity Equation- vol of Q per cardiac cylcle is teh same as Ao valve as at the mitral valve or in LVOT. So: Ao vlv area (cm2) = (LVOT area)(mean LVOT velocity)/(mean Ao vlv orifice velocity).

-Nl Ao vlv in teen/adult is 3-4cm2

-mild >1.5cm, mod 1-1.5cm2, sev <1cm2

-Kids- Nl 2cm2/m2, mild >0.75, sev <0.5

-TDI- check for sys and diast dysfx

-Sx in pt w Nl EF has been attributed to dias dysfx- assoc w incr filling P, incr myocardial stiffness

-Doppler fr mitral or pulm vn to estimate LV filling P- d/o loading conditions, HR, other factors that limit usefulness.

-TDI for sys/diast mitral annular velocity- allows quantification of sys long axis fx and diast fx

-E:E' (E=early mitral inflow v, E'= early diast mitral annular velocity) E:E' correlates to LVEDP, so good to check diast dysfx. TDI for sys fx on long axis can check for dysfx even if Nl EF. Longitudinal fibers are in the subendocardium, so more vulnerable to ischemia than circumferential fibers. Thus Long axis dysfx might precede transverse axis dysfx.


Cardiac MRI:

-check LV mass & fx

-able to check P grad and Ao vlv area quantification, correlates well w Doppler


Cath:

-Gold standard, but often no longer needed. Usually only for Tx w balloon valvuloplasty

-Check CO w Fick/TD, LVEDP, P grad (mean and pk to pk); angio for LV size/fx, Ao vlv annulus size, degree of leaflet thickening & cusp mobility, cor art patency, Asc Ao contour/size

-Gorlin Method- calc effective valve orifice area- (Ao vlv Flow)/(44.3 x sq root of mean P grad across the vlv)

-AVF determined fr CO and sys ejec pd- check SET (sys ej time) = check simultaneous P tracing from Ao to LV. Sys Ej Pd (SEP) per min (S/min) is determined by SET xHR. (SEP= SET xHR)

-AVF (mL/s) = CO/SEP

-Mean P grad (mmHg) - determined fr planimetry using simultaneous P tracing fr Ao & LV

-Ao Vlv Area is then calc fr: AVF/(sq root of MPGx44.3)

-Ao vlv orifice area reps the most reliable index of stenosis severity (in theory), bc unlike P grad, it doesn't depend on loading conditions and HR


NHx:

-f/u data is poor, so hard to know, esp w such wide Sx range...

-if present as infant, likely more signif AS, w higher mortality (even w Tx)

-25% of pts in one study were <2yo and the 1yr survival was 64% in these pt, despite surg for most

-if >2yo at study enrollment, the 25yr survival was 85%

-Mild AS can be stable for years, but eventually progresses

-1%/yr get bacterial endocarditis in some series, but likely lower (0.27%) in another study. incr AS--> Incr risk.


Tx:

-SBE ppx

-exercise restrictions (36th Bethesda Conference guidelines)

-Nearly all progress and pt will need surgery, (unlike in adults where we limit intervention. Goal survival in kids is>50yrs, while in adults a 20yr survival is c/s long term.

-Balloon valvuloplasty is usually done before any surgical valvotomy, and with either procedure valve replacement is eventually needed for subsequent AS/AR.

-Adults w congen Ao vlv stenosis will get cusp Ca'ion--> poor results w valvotomy/plasty so usually replace valve as young adult

-Kids/Teens w AS and signif AR will need replacement of the valve

-ACC/AHA-->

ASx:

Intervention based on Doppker pk to pk instantaneous gradient

>70mmHg c/s for all pts

50-70mmHg and competitive sports/future pregnancy

Intervention based on Cath pk to pk instantaneous gradient

>60mmHg c/s for all pts

>50mmHg if competitive sports/pregnancy

+Sx (angina, syncope, DOE), ischemia, repol'n changes on ECG

-valvuloplasty if >50mmHg grad

-c/s alt cause of Sx/Si if <50mmHg

-No valvuloplasty if <50mmHg and ASx unless CO is decr

-If milder AS, check ECG and echo Doppler

-If pk Doppler grad ?36mmHg (pk v >3m/s), then f/u q 1yr

-If pk <36mmHg, then f/u q2 years

-If pk >36, then c/s ECG if pt interested in sports

-c/s cath if ECG and echo are discordant w each other (to check pk to pk grad)

-36th Bethesda Conf Task Force Sports recs:

-Mild AS = cath pk to pk <30mmHg, mean Doppler grad <25, or pk instant. Doppler grad <40 ==> cleared for all competitive sports if ASx and Nl exercise tolerance

-Mod AS- cath pk to pk 30-50mmHg, mean Doppler grad 25-40, pk Doppler grad 40-70mmHg ==> if ASx, AND mild-no LVH, and no repol'n xx on ECG, and Nl exercise test. ==> ok for sports with low static compenent and low-mod dynamic component (e.g. golf, bowling, baseball, volleyball)

-If no SVT/VT ==> ok for mod static component and low dynamic comp (diving, archery, motorcycle, archery)

-Sev AS = cath pk to pk >50mmHg, mean Doppler grad >40mmHg, pk Doppler grad >70mmHg ==> no competitive sports

-If Bicuspid Ao valve, but no AS/AR, they are still at risk for progressive Ao root dilation/dissection, and mortality risk is same in younger pt than pt >40yo!!

-Ao Dissection- 9x incr risk if bicuspid vlv (thus more common cause of dissection than Marfan bc bicuspid vlv is common).

-Nearly 1/2 of teens/20s w bicuspid vlv have Ao root dilation

-Most pt w dissection have htn, so must manage the BP well.

-B-blocker/ACI not proven to help in normotensive pt, but are good for pt w htn

-Ao dilation is precursor to dissection so monitor closely if +dilation; c/s prophylactic surgery even if ASx if Ao diam is 5cm or more, or if rapid Ao growth rate (out of proportion to body)

Aortic Valve Replacement

-if progressive AR or recurrent AS despite balloon, then c/s surgery or replacement (surgical repair isn't very durable)

-Mechanical Valve- most durable, but must anticoagulate and it can't grow, so ng in small kids

-Bioprosthetic Valve- homograft- no anticoagulation needed, but still can't grow, and poor longevity, espec. in small kids.

-Ross procedure- used in some centers for kids/infants- Pulm valve used for Ao, and homograft for new pulm vlv; here Ao vlv (old pulm vlv) can grow. But, here there can be pulm homograft dysfx in most patients even soon postop. And many can have dysfx of neoaortic valve.

-PerQ Ao valve replacement- new, for adults, espec if sev AS and inoperable.

Valvar AS in Infancy

Sx:

-10% of AS presents as infant w CHF Sx

-in utero, mild-mod AS--> inc LV P +/- LVH; sev AS--> signif LVH w decr LV compliance--> decr Q thru L hrt--> LV/MV/Ao vlv annulus/LVOT hypoplasia; +/- CoAo +/- Asc Ao hyoplasia

-Endomyocardial fibroelastosis +/- papillary muscle infarction bc of VO2/DO2 mismatch

-Thus Sev fetal AS can --> HLHS

-bc RV can handle entire CO, the fetus can handle sev AS well even w LV hyoplasia, but once born, Sx dvp quickly

-ASx till PDA closes if LV is big enough/good enough Fx, then decr PO, tachypnea, FTT, sys Murmur +/- gallop, hepatomegaly, weak periph pulses

-If sev AS, LV cant handle a full CO so when PDA closes, --> shock, hyperdynamic RV impulse, tachypnea/retractions, but not always a sys murmur!!

Eval:

-Echo- check fx, Ao size, increased echodensity of enodmyocardium/mitral valve pap muscle = fibroelastosis/pap infarct; RV enlargementl check fr CoAo, cor tratriatum, supraannular Mitral stenosis, pulm vn stenosis, Asc Ao hypoplasia/dilation

-NOTE that Ao vlv grad may be less than actual stenosis bc of decr CO due to poor fx


Tx:

-PGE right away, +/- inotropy for fx, avoid supp O2 if ductal dependent, avoid hypervent'n if intubated

-Critical AS + small LV- check if LV is good enough to support a 2 ventricle repair

-non-apex forming LV, small Ao annulus (<5mm), small MV annulus (<9mm)- maybe better survival with Norwood palliation or transplant then with 2 ventricle repair (MA48 ref 105)

-Rhodes (MA48 ref 106) predictive success equation for 2ventric repair: Ao dimension indexed to BSA, ratio of long axis of LV to long axis of heart, and indexed mitral valve area

-Congen Heart Surgeons Society prospective multicenter study (MA48 ref 107) for 5 yr survival--> d/o age, Ao vlv Z score, gr of endomyocardial fibroelastosis, Asc Ao diam, signif TR, and LV length Z score

-signif retrograde Q thru distal Ao arch via PDA is assoc w lower success in 2vent repair

-If 2vent repair==> balloon valvuloplasty/surg valvotomy soon (both good but balloon may --> higher degree of AR & surg valvotomy incr risk residual/recurrent stenosis).

-Mechanical valve ng bc of poor tissue durability

-Ross-Konno preferred- Ross = pulm vlv autograft; Konno = dilate Ao annulus

-Resecting endomyocard fibroelastosis might incr growth potential in borderline LV

-Some c/s Norwood with subsequent Rastelli for a 2 vent repair (!)

SUBVALVAR AORTIC STENOSIS

Epi:

-10-20% of AS in kids; M>F 2-3:1, 1/2 w assoc CHD- VSD, CoAo, AVCD, valv AS, MV xx

-Rare in infants (except for malalignment VSD w post dev of outlet septum into LVOT)

-likely acquired bc not often seen neonatally, due to abNl endothelial substrate that undergoes abNl prolif due to ? stimulus- abNl shear stress fr abNl Q pattern fr geometric/anatomic LVOT variation- incr mitral-Ao separation/steeper Aortoseptal angle. ?tissue causing it- maybe embryonal endocardial cushion tissue


Path:

-collar or ridge of membranous &/or fibromuscular tissue encircling the LVOT, or is diffuse/tunnel like.

-may have a membranous curtain arising fr a muscular base

-made of collagen fibers, elastic fibers, myocytes; fibrous tissue may be tethered to Ao vlv or ant mitral leaflet.

-Mitral valve xx- insertion of pap muscle or chordal tissue into septum/Ao leaflet, accessory mitral valve tissue, muscularization of sub Ao part of ant leaflet.

-Ao vlv- maybe thick, usually tricuspid. Ao vlv abNly are usually acquired, maybe bc of turbulent flow jet damaging the Ao valve cusps; but might be bc of an underlying dz substrate


Physiology:

-fixed subAo stenosis- similar physio to valvar AS, w P OD to LV--> LVH; LVH usually proportional to AS but can be out of proportion too. xx of subendocard ischemia/fibrosis too...


Sx/Dx:

-Dx w echo

-if isolated, usually p/w ASx murmur- first thought to be innocent, but then progresses so it sounds like an LVOTO. CP/Syncope only if sev AS.

-SEM loudest at L mid sternal border w rad to USB and suprasternal notch

-DDx subvalvar AS bc no systolic click

-LV impulse may be hyperdynamic,

-May have AR or MR

-ECG: LVH often, even if mild AS, but can be Nl in sev subAo stenosis

-CXR: usually Nl, Asc Ao dilation uncommon

-Echo: high Sn/Sp. May see early systolic partial closure and fluttering of Ao leaflets. check Ao/mitral anatomy & fx closely.

-Doppler --> v accel of pk instantaneous and mean P grad.

-Coexistant Ao vlv stenosis- see w additional PW doppler velocity that increases above Ao vlv

-TEE if you need to better see the LVOT anatomy

-Cath: not needed usually



NHx:

-Progression is variable if mild subvlv AS, and can be stable for yrs in kids/adults (MA48 ref 149-151)

-Assoc w quicker progression: higher initial P grad, shorter distance bn obst lesion and Ao vlv, and Ant mitral vlv leaflet involvement (MA48 ref 152-153)

-AR is common, usually mild but can be worse. R/F for mod-sev Ao regurg- Doppler pk instantaneous grad >50mmHg & incr age at Dx- but low Sn & hard to predict dvp of AR. AR is common in adults w/o operation of subAo stenosis, but it's rarely hemodynamically signif.

-Kids at low risk for Ao vlv dysfx: mild grad, thin and mobile Ao vlv leaflets, subAo lesion not close to Ao vlv.


Tx:

-Balloon dilation reported, but limited long term success. Tx mainly surgical.

-Indications: not agreed on. Bc obst can be rapidly progressive and bc Ao regurg may result fr progressive damage to leaflets fr turbulent Q, --> rationale for early intervention.

-Incr risk of AR at f/u in pt's w higher preop grad; however progression is very variable

-Many pt w mild sub Ao vlv AS are stable for many yrs w/o AR progression (MA48 ref 149-159)

-AR might dvp even w surgery, and might be more prominant post surgery (MA48 ref 150,159)

--kids w subAo lesions not in close prox to Ao vlv, mild obst (pk Doppler grad <30mmHg), and Ao vlv cusps that are thin/mobile, can be managed w/o surgery, but w just close f/u (MA ref 142, 159)

-Pt w progressive obst should have surgery


-Surgery: resect obstructive tissue at LVOT. c/s muscle resection in addition to the membrane may decr risk of recur subAo stenosis (bc up to 20% may recur)

-Correct mitral valve xx that can contribute to subAo AS- e.g. anomalous pap muscle insertion

-Complications: heart block, worsen AR/MR, create VSD

-higher risk w tunnel like LVOTO

-In some subAo stenosis, espec w small Ao annulus, need a bigger rsxn w Ross/Konno


Long Term Px:

-Many have complete/lasting relief post surgery w/o xx

-Many have mild Ao vlv dysfx which can progress, and can have recurrence or incomplete relief of subAo AS ("not uncommon").

-Periodic long term f/u needed (!!)

-Postop pt: reoperate if recur AS or incr AR

-SBE ppx is advisable indefineitely in most pt bc of Ao vlv thickening and AR (even if mild) +/- resid turbulance in LVOT


SUPRAVALVULAR AORTIC STENOSIS


Epi:

-Supravalvar AS- least common

-30-50% of pts w it have Williams-Beuren syndrome- supravalvar AS + periph pulm stenosis + mental retard + abNl facies. 20% of supravalvar AS are familial w/o WB syndrome

-reduced or AbNl expression of elastin gene on chrm 7q (Auto Dom), heterozygotes have 50% expression


Path:

-Reduced elastin at arterial media--> decr elasticity and marked thickened media w smooth muscle hypertrophy, disorganization, incr collagen deposition

-AS is usually at Sinotubular Jct, but 1/4 have diffuse narrowing of entire Asc Ao +/- transverse in some

-Main/Prox branch PA often stenotic, and Ao arch branches can also be involved

-Renal and mesenteric arteries are affected in about 1/3

-Periph attachment of the Ao vlv commissures to the ST Jct, so in pt w supravlvr stenosis, teh Ao vlv cusps might be thickened/adherent to the narrowed STJ.

-Can have impaired coronary Q bc of adhesion of an Ao vlv leaflet to STJ, or by thickened Ao wall


Physiology:

-similar to sub and valvar AS, but worse bc of coronary involvement- Coronaries exposed to high Psys--> xx to coronary vasculature, and the coronaries can get stenosed, limiting diastolic Qcor ==> inc risk for subendocard ischemia, fibrosis, pap muscle infarct, sudden death


Sx/Dx:

-ASx murmur --> Dx most often

-Sx: angina, syncope, CV arrest, DOE in >1/2 of published cases (probably of sicker pts, though)

-Sys M like other AS loudest at RUSB w rad to suprasternal notch/neck

-often +suprasternal thrill

-usually no sys click

-BP in R arm often > L arm bc of Coanda Effect, and fr stenosis of Ao arch branches

-ECG- Nl or LVH, T wave changes, ST depr

-CXR- Nl usually

-Echo- High Sn but sometimes not completely delineate anatomy of Asc Ao/arch/branches, so c/s Cath if needed, esp if Ao valve involvement; though MRI/CT prob better bc less invasive

-Ensure to check other sites of involvement of anelastin vasculopathy- Ao arch, branches, PAs, renal arts!


NHx:

-? bc it is rare, and much better Dx/Tx recently; sudden death has been reported


Tx:

-surgery is best way to Tx

-?indications, but most places use AS criteria for P gradients

-Use SBE ppx


Surgical options:

-Simple patch enlargement of ST Jct above the noncoronary sinus

-Extended Aortoplasty w an inverted bifurcated patch into the noncoronary and right coronary sinuses

-Brom's technique w insertion of separate patches in all 3 sinuses after transecting the Ao

-Surgically remove obst to coronary Q, c/s internal mammary art bypass grafting

-W diffuse stenosis of Asc/transverse Ao, c/s an elongated patch, w deep hypothermic circ arrest if needed


Long Term Px:

-?, but w current techniques recurrence is very low

-must monitor long term bc of high chance of Ao vlv xx (though usually mild), and other xx from elastin vasculopathy.