EDTC 807 Implementation and Evaluation of Curriculum
EDTC 807 Implementation and Evaluation of Curriculum
This course provided candidates with a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of implementation and evaluation of educational technology programs. The philosophies, methods, and processes of curriculum design in educational technology provide the framework for curricular models; resources for decision-making; and evaluation methods for educational and corporate settings.
Please click below to view each individual assessment:
The Evolution of Educational Theory
Progressive vs. Conservative View on Education
Unschooling as a Form of Informal Learning
Proposal for Curriculum Implementation
Rationale: This paper traces the historical development of educational theory from classical perspectives to contemporary frameworks, situating current practices in technology integration within a rich theoretical tradition. I selected this artifact because it demonstrates my foundation in educational philosophy, a necessary grounding for any leader who seeks to implement curriculum and technology with intentionality and depth. Understanding where educational ideas come from, how they have evolved, and how they continue to shape practice informs my approach to designing inclusive, neuropsychology-informed learning environments. This work reflects my commitment to theory-practice integration, which is a hallmark of doctoral-level leadership.
Rationale: This comparative analysis examines the tensions and complementarities between progressive and conservative educational philosophies, exploring their implications for curriculum implementation and technology integration. I selected this artifact because engaging with competing ideological frameworks is essential for any educational leader who must navigate politically complex institutional environments. As someone who bridges clinical, academic, and advocacy roles, I must regularly engage with diverse stakeholders who hold differing views about education. This work demonstrates my capacity for nuanced, evidence-based reasoning that respects ideological diversity while remaining grounded in research and professional ethics.
Rationale: This paper explores unschooling as a radical form of informal learning, critically analyzing its philosophical foundations, applications, and implications for educational technology leadership. I selected this artifact because it challenged me to engage seriously with educational perspectives that differ significantly from mainstream institutional models, an intellectual exercise that broadened my understanding of how learning occurs beyond formal settings. This work connects to my professional experience with children and families who operate outside traditional educational frameworks, including home-based early intervention and DIR®/Floortime therapy. The artifact demonstrates my capacity for open-minded, critically engaged scholarship.
Rationale: This curriculum implementation proposal presents a structured plan for integrating an educational technology program within a specific organizational context, applying theoretical frameworks from the course to a practical leadership challenge. I selected this as a key artifact because it most directly demonstrates my competency in the theory-to-practice application that defines the Theory and Practice domain. The ability to design, propose, and evaluate curriculum is central to my career goals as an educational technology leader and future instructional designer or program director. This work reflects my growing confidence in translating doctoral knowledge into actionable, evidence-based program plans.