For organizations with valuable digital assets, it is essential to take appropriate protection and security measures. Protection can make the difference between thriving as an industry and suffering from data loss caused by a cyberattack. Many organizations entrust antivirus software to each platform device to keep their networks secure.
With the rise in cybercrimes, everyone needs to ensure their security is assured. So today, we will discuss two popular antivirus products that are much more productive in ensuring your device’s security.
It’s a comparison battle of two antivirus products; McAfee vs Kaspersky Antivirus are well-known brands, but which software offers the best protection for your device? Keep reading and find out.
Compromised web security can be a nightmare for associations, but antivirus software reduces the potential for malicious activity on your devices by detecting and identifying security threats.
Symantec is a cloud-based service to keep networks secure through device learning and behavioral analytics. It finds threads through all activity in real-time. Any suspicious activity is highlighted as an anomaly or outlier—various methods, including breach detection, lateral movement, and command and control beaconing. Also, the forensic examination process allows the detection of memory-resident outliers.
Also, McAfee uses device learning to detect security threats in your devices. They deliver local and cloud-based detection to analyze threats that can be created to evade detection.
The software continuously performs intelligence-guided analyses to detect threats. These data are made for real-time search and inspection and historical search. And a unique feature of McAfee MVISION EDR is their McAfee MVISION Insights, which identifies threats before hitting your devices. This is done by using context on new external threats in the research.
It’s one thing to identify security threats and visualize your data, but you must take appropriate action to protect your devices from malicious activity. Let’s talk about these tools’ approaches to a threat response.
After selecting security threats within a device, Symantec can respond in many ways. First, it can handle threats via its “playbook” that automates the security check workflow. These playbooks can also be accessed by users who want to make their automated workflows. Symantec can automatically submit suspicious files for sandbox analysis, leverage statistical data to find heterogeneous IP addresses, and identify domains and IP addresses associated with data exfiltration. Lastly, it can rapidly treat all affected devices with blacklisting, file deletion, and endpoint quarantining. Users can easily use their system to repair multiple endpoints with its powerful eraser capabilities.
McAfee’s EDR device protects networks by swiftly checking on potential security breaches. From there, it gives users information on threats and guides them with suggestions on appropriate ways to mitigate the issues. Users can use methods to handle threats such as killing a process, quarantining endpoints on affected devices, and file deletion. These operations can be performed on a single response and easily scaled up and implemented across the network.
To decide whether a McAfee or Symantec product will be best for you, you should consider the major differences between the two systems. McAfee’s response tools allow users to take automated action on affected devices, taking a hands-off approach to cybersecurity threat management. But Symantec’s customizable detection and alert features may be a better fit for your association if it frequently experiences activity that may appear malicious but is common and safe for its operations. You can choose the best option for your device’s security needs by considering the features that will most benefit your organization.
Visit: Mcafee Login
Source: https://isclogin.com/blog/mcafee-vs-symantec-antivirus/