On that same day, I had a conversation with this young, agnostic man with the umbrella - *Ryan. *Ryan had previously spoken with one of our student evangelists and had originally come back to talk to him; however, he was in class, so *Ryan was stuck with me! *Ryan and I had an interesting conversation about their previous conversation and the arguments they had discussed for moral relativism and objective morality. *Ryan honestly did most of the hard work for me as he seems to be a genuinely open and seeking person. He asked me how I make distinctions between the Abrahamic religions and choose Christianity - great question by the way - so I discussed the division at the cross and the extremely compelling evidence and crux of Christianity that event is. Muslims say Jesus didn't die, and Jews say He didn't rise - both are extremely weak historically, leaving Christianity the most compelling based on what we can know. From there, *Ryan asked about God's laws and standards - specifically regarding homosexuality. This can be an emotionally loaded conversation for many people, but I took a pretty simple approach with *Ryan that is founded in the authority of Jesus assuming He rose from the dead. It essentially went like this: If Jesus rose from the dead and thus proved that He is God, then who am I to assume I know better how to live than Him? Even if I don't fully agree or understand from my current perspective, if I agree that Jesus is God, then I really should have little issue moving forward. This can begin painting this image of faith in Jesus which is accurately understood as a trust and reliance - not a cognitive subscription. If Jesus is my loving creator, why would I not listen to His instruction? This is where it boils down to whether or not you choose to trust Jesus, and the resurrection is key!