Author: Nami Omori

Publication Permission was granted in February 2026

*

Adjustment and Limits in Ernest Hemingway's "Big Two-Hearted River"

Ernest Hemingway’s “Big Two-Hearted River” (1925) looks like a simple fishing trip, but it is not only a story about camping and fishing in nature to heal. It shows how Nick Adams faces natural conditions and rebuilds stability by adjusting his distance and actions. Nick arrives at Seney and finds a burned town and a changed landscape. The story does not explain his past in a direct way. Rather than describing his past directly, Hemingway lets Nick’s state emerge through what he notices and what he chooses to do. This essay argues that the contrast between the burned land and the river is not a simple message that nature heals people. Rather, it makes visible a process of recovery in which Nick restores balance by making careful choices about where to go, what to do, and what limits to keep. I would like to analyze this process in four parts. First, the burned town shows loss and damage. Second, the river shows a kind of steadiness that requires constant adjustment. Third, Nick’s camp routine creates a small space of control and short-term safety. Finally, the swamp shows a limit Nick does not cross, which suggests that recovery depends on timing and readiness. The story begins in a burned landscape and does not explain Nick’s feelings directly. Hemingway writes, “There was no town, nothing but the rails and the burned-over country. The thirteen saloons that had lined the one street of Seney had not left a trace” (177). These statements are not emotional, but they are absolute, and they frame Seney as a place where normal life has been erased. Ng helps explain why this matters by arguing that Hemingway omits direct references to war and instead uses a repeated fire motif, suggesting that he replace[s] it with the recurring motif of “fire” (Ng 144). The story begins in a burned landscape and does not explain Nick’s feelings directly. His response is also telling. He does not talk about grief or explain the cause; after looking, he starts walking toward the river. The story begins by showing trauma through absence and a damaged landscape, and it presents coping as movement away from what feels too difficult to face.

After the burned town, Nick’s attention shifts to the river, and the river scene models a kind of stability that depends on constant adjustment. Nick watches trout holding their position in fast water for a long time (178). The moment is calm, but Nick’s body reacts: “Nick’s heart tightened as the trout moved. He felt all the old feeling” (Hemingway 178). This line shows that the past is still present, but Hemingway does not define the feeling. LitCharts clarifies how the trout image works: the fish appear steady in the current, yet they maintain this steadiness through effort, because their fins waver and they change their positions in quick angles before settling again (Thekkiam 4). This matters because Nick seems to want steadiness after a world of change. The trout suggest that steadiness is not a permanent condition; it is an active practice inside motion. At the same time, Ng cautions that symbolic readings can reduce the river to only a human reflection and overlook its independent ecological reality (Ng 143). The story supports this caution because Nick must read the river’s real conditions—current, depth, light—and respond to them. The river is both a real environment and a place where Nick learns how to stay steady without denying change.

Nick’s effort to rebuild order is clear in the camping sequence, where procedure becomes a form of safety. He searches for a flat place, chops roots, pulls plants, and smooths the ground. After he sets the tent and arranges the space, he describes a settled state: “He had made his camp. He was settled. Nothing could touch him” (Hemingway 184). LitCharts notes that Nick’s careful, step-by-step work in setting up camp helps him manage the space around him, and this supports a sense of control and safety (Thekkiam 5). Svoboda also suggests that Hemingway’s realistic surface details can carry metaphorical meaning (61). In this episode, the detailed camp routine can be read in that way, because it shows Nick using order and repetition to stay steady. Hemingway does not state Nick’s anxiety directly, but the careful routine suggests a need to reduce disruption. Nick cannot control the past, but he can control the tent pegs, the level ground, and the order of tasks. The camping episode therefore shows how ordinary procedure can work as a short-term psychological defense and make daily life manageable.

Nick reaches a point he does not cross when he looks toward the swamp and decides not to enter it. Hemingway presents Nick’s refusal in plain physical terms:

Nick did not want to go in there now. He felt a reaction against deep wading with the water deepening up under his armpits, to hook big trout in places impossible to land them. In the swamp the banks were bare, the big cedars came together overhead, the sun did not come through, except in patches; in the fast deep water, in the half light, the fishing would be tragic. In the swamp fishing was a tragic adventure. Nick did not want it (198).

This passage does not explain his feelings directly. It presents a decision about distance and risk. Nick stops before the swamp because he reads it as a place with less light and less control. Ng suggests that Nick’s refusal matters because his Slow practice has not yet “fully enable[d]” him to face the swamp, so his recovery is still in progress and gradual (152). In other words, Nick’s recovery depends on limits he sets for himself. The river allows skill and control, but the swamp demands deeper risk and deeper wading in weaker light. Nick chooses to stop before that threshold. The final line suggests that this is not avoidance forever. It is a plan for later, when he is ready. The story therefore presents recovery as a matter of timing and readiness. 

In conclusion, Hemingway’s “Big Two-Hearted River” (1925) shows recovery as a practical process of adjustment, not a simple idea that nature automatically heals Nick. The burned town sets the problem through what is missing and damaged, and Hemingway avoids direct explanation of Nick’s past or emotions. Nick responds by moving away from the ruins and toward places he can handle. At the river, the trout image suggests a model of stability that depends on steady effort inside movement, and Nick’s attention stays on real conditions like current, depth, and light. In the camping sequence, he builds a small, controlled space through careful steps, and this routine gives him temporary safety and reduces mental overload. The swamp marks a limit that Nick does not cross. He stops because he is not ready for deeper risk and less control. The ending leaves the decision open, so recovery depends on timing and readiness.

Works Cited

Hemingway, Ernest. “Big Two-Hearted River,” in The Nick Adams Stories, edited by　Philip Young, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1972 [1925].

Ng, Lay Sion. “Fire Ecologies in ‘Big Two-Hearted River,’” in Hemingway, Ecology and Culture: Re-reading Hemingway in the Anthropocene. Bloomsbury Academic, 2025, pp. 141-56.

Svoboda, Frederic J. “The Things That Nick Adams Carried to the Big Two-Hearted River,” in Hemingway’s Short Stories: Reflections on Teaching, Reading and Understanding, edited by Frederic J. Svoboda. The Kent State University Press, 2019, pp. 55-62.

Thekkiam, Sruthi. “Big Two-Hearted River.” LitCharts, 2019, pp. 1-23.