Overall, peer feedback was positive with only a small need to change some wireframe designs for clarity, and add (a page or two) to give the proper workflow to all screens. The general issues brought to our attention were the sizing and ambiguity of one of the elements (“camera button”), the suggestion of an additional screen for password assistance, and lack of clarity on the interaction and necessity of the complimentary smartwatch app. Due to the available tools using our wireframing application, some of the buttons were not made particularly clear for other users when labels were not included. Given the nature of the feedback, we are glad to see that the system seems to generally have an understandable workflow with minimal need to change design elements in the UI itself.
3 Categories of feedback
Problems/Questions
How We Will Improve
We have added a new registration screen when users create their account. There was a link without the wireframe screen available, and now it has been implemented.
In order to meet the new standard for the camera screens, the button has been increased in size. After changing the size, the screen area for scanning had to also be reduced, but not by any amount that would otherwise impact any functionality.
We will make changes to the appearance of certain elements, but some constraints of the wireframing tool left us unable to display some features (e.g. “you are here” indicator).
We are currently unsure of how to address the question regarding the clarity of the smart watch. The smart watch app is not meant to scan, but to be scanned in use with the incentive program that our app provides. We do not believe that changing the UI design for the smartwatch will help other users understand affordances that the app provides. We can, however, provide a new page that provides users instructions on how to use any of unclear features. These features will be sure to be present in the final iterations of the project.