What are the implications for responses to environmental change? Stoneflies may be especially vulnerable to rapid environmental change because of limited dispersal. We use molecular markers to infer population structure, patterns of gene flow, population-habitat associations of aquatic organisms. We develop and apply tools to monitor the fate of adaptive, neutral, and ecologically relevant traits in natural populations.
We sampling different habitats and environmental conditions to model genes changes among populations.
Gamboa M, Serrana J, Takemon Y, Monaghan MT, Watanabe K. Spatial and phylogenetic structure of Alpine stoneflies assemblages across seven habitats using DNA-species. Oecologia, accepted
Regilme MA, Sato M, Tamura T, Arai R, Otake M, Ikeda S, Doi M, Tanaka K, Gamboa M, Monaghan MT, Watanabe K. Comparative population genetic structure of two Ixodidae ticks (Ixodes ovatus and Haemaphysalis flava) in Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 94: 104999.
Balingit JC, Carvajal TM, Saito-Obata M, Gamboa M, Nicolasora AD, Sy AK, Oshitani H, Watanabe K. 2020. Individual-based dengue virus surveillance in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes collected concurrently with suspected patients in Tarlac City, Philippines. BMC Parasite and Vectors, 13: 594.
Bin L, Yaegashi S, Carvajal TM, Gamboa M, Watanabe K. 2020. Machine learning based detection of adaptive divergence of the stream mayfly Ephemera strigata populations. Ecology and Evolution. 10: 6677-6687.
Gamboa M, RK Kimbirauskas, RW Merritt, MT Monaghan. 2012. A molecular approach to identifying the natural prey of the African creeping water bug (Naucoris, Hemiptera), a potential reservoir of Mycobacterium ulcerans. Journal of Insects Science 12:2.