____________________________________________________________________________________

This article will break down how these words are used in legal documents and how they impact the obligations, rights, and actions of the parties involved.

1. Shall: Imposing a Legal Obligation

In legal contracts, the word shall is used to express an obligation or a requirement. It signifies that a party is legally bound to perform a certain action, and failure to do so could result in a breach of contract or other legal consequences.

• Example: "The tenant shall pay the rent on the first day of each month."
  
  

• Explanation: In this sentence, shall indicates a clear obligation. The tenant is legally required to pay the rent on time, and failing to do so would constitute a violation of the terms of the lease.
  
  

In legal documents, shall is often used to define a duty, an expectation, or a requirement that one party must meet. It leaves little room for interpretation or flexibility.

2. Will: Predicting or Agreeing on Future Actions

While shall implies a mandatory obligation, will is often used in legal contexts to predict or agree on future actions. Will is slightly less rigid than shall, but it still expresses an intention or a promise to take action.

• Example: "The company will deliver the product within 30 days of receiving the order."
  
  

• Explanation: In this case, will indicates a commitment to deliver the product within a set timeframe. It reflects the company’s intention to fulfill its promise, though there is less force behind it than shall. However, if the company fails to deliver on time, they could still face legal consequences.
  
  

In legal contracts, will is commonly used to describe what parties agree to do in the future or what will happen under certain conditions.

3. Must: Expressing a Strong Obligation

The word must is used in legal documents to express a strong requirement or necessity. It indicates that there is no flexibility or option—it’s a requirement that must be fulfilled.

• Example: "The contractor must complete the work by the specified deadline."
  
  

• Explanation: Here, must places a strict obligation on the contractor. It emphasizes that failing to complete the work on time will result in legal consequences, such as penalties or a breach of contract.
  
  

Unlike shall, which can be interpreted as a directive or expectation, must carries more urgency and leaves no room for negotiation. It’s often used for deadlines, safety regulations, and conditions that cannot be overlooked.

4. May: Allowing Flexibility or Giving Permission

On the other end of the spectrum, may is used to express an option or permission. When a contract states that a party may do something, it means they have the option to take action, but they are not required to do so.

• Example: "The buyer may cancel the contract if the goods are defective."
  
  

• Explanation: In this case, may gives the buyer the option to cancel the contract if the goods are not as described or are defective. However, the buyer is not obligated to cancel the contract—it’s their choice.
  
  

May provides flexibility in a legal document, indicating that a party has the right to take action but is not compelled to do so. This word is often used in situations where discretion is allowed.

5. Why Understanding the Future Tense in Legal English is Crucial

The precise use of shall, will, must, and may in legal documents is critical to understanding the responsibilities, rights, and options of each party. Misinterpreting the meaning of these words could lead to costly mistakes, misunderstandings, or even legal disputes.

• Shall implies a legal obligation that must be followed.
  
  

• Will indicates a future action or commitment but may not always have the same level of enforcement.
  
  

• Must carries a strong obligation with no room for flexibility.
  
  

• May provides optional actions or permissions.
  
  

By understanding the nuances of these words, you can better interpret the legal text and know exactly what is required of you or the other parties involved. Misunderstanding a word like must versus may could have serious consequences, especially if it changes the interpretation of a clause in a contract.

Call to Action:

To further improve your understanding of legal terminology, check out the videos available on Wiki Fudgel. These videos are delivered in clear, comprehensible English, and feature subtitles in multiple languages. Whether you're new to Legal English or looking to deepen your knowledge, Wiki Fudgel's videos are a great resource to help you understand legal terms and concepts more effectively.