These stats explain the need for individuals, couples, families and teams to have Enneagram Coaching.
We have the right to display this information, but further demographic information and other copyrighted research are both prohibited by contractual obligation.
A statistical dataset of ~25,000 (24,971) individuals from different types and backgrounds who have taken the equivalent of Enneahouse's Master Course from another Enneagram Coaching company (who has asked to remain anonymous; the source data is only available to licensed Enneagram Coaches) reveals the following average benefits of receiving Enneagram Coaching, with the following sets, hereafter referred to as sets 1-5.
1. No Sessions
2. Typing Interview
3. 3 Sessions
4. 6 Sessions
5. 12 Sessions
After Typing Interview and 12 sessions, all measured rates improve:
Self awareness improves by >99%
Divorce rates decrease by >90%
Workplace turnover decreases by ~62%
Parent-Child relationships improve by ~84%
Teacher-student relationships improve by ~71%
Other conflicts decrease by ~72%
Personal functionality, productivity and financial perception increase by an average of ~38%
At the start, clients were asked to identify which of three sets of nine situations they thought best described them. The Enneagram Coach would review the person's comprehensive type after all 13 sessions (including Typing) and determine whether they could identify their Type, their Core Desire and their Core Fear according to the Coach's knowledge and experience.
At the end of the sessions, clients were asked to identify their motivations, and their responses were compared to the motivations the Coach saw in them.
Initially, only 17% of responses matched later assessment values.
By the end of the Typing interview, 60% of responses matched later assessment values.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 93% of responses matched later assessment values.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 99% of responses matched later assessment values.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 99.94% of responses matched later assessment values.
Overall, Core Motivation recognition improved by 99.96%ยน after all four sets.
For each set, clients were given nine unique passages from classic literature. They were asked to choose from a list of nine possible motivations for the character's actions in that scene. All characters have been evaluated by the Enneagram Institute. Most individuals posted related answers for all passages.
Before the typing interview, 3% of clients correctly identified 8 or 9 of the characters' motivations.
By the end of the Typing Interview, 4% of clients correctly identified 8 or 9 of the characters' motivations.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 40% of clients correctly identified 8 or 9 of the characters' motivations. By this point, 100% of clients could successfully identify at least 4 out of 9 motivations.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 59% of clients correctly identified 8 or 9 of the characters' motivations.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 91% of clients correctly identified 8 or 9 of the characters' motivations. By this point, 99.97% of clients could successfully identify at least 6 out of 9 motivations.
Overall, character motivation recognition in familiar characters improved by ~95%.
223 unique spouses (.9% of all clients) who were on the verge of divorce ordered Enneagram Coaching. 29 individuals (13% of the 223) initially ordered coaching for just themselves. 35 couples (70 people; 31%) initially ordered coaching for both partners. 62 couples (124 people, 56%) ordered both individual and couple coaching.ย
By the end of the Typing Interview, 1 spouse (.4%) had chosen not to get divorced.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 47 spouses (including 19 couples) (21%) had chosen not to get divorced.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 156 spouses (including 70 couples) (70%) had chosen not to get divorced.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 200 spouses (including 89 couples) (90%) had chosen not to get divorced.
Overall, spouses who both received individual coaching were 29% less likely to get divorced than spouses where only one received coaching. Spouses where both received individual coaching and who received joint coaching were 82% less likely to get divorced than spouses without joint coaching, and they were 87% less likely to get divorced than spouses where only one received coaching.
4,509 unique parents (18% of all clients) who were concerned specifically with the long-term behavior of one or more children ordered Enneagram Coaching. 888 individuals (20% of the 4,509) initially ordered coaching for just their child. 1,473 (33%) initially ordered coaching for just themselves. 2,148 (48%) ordered both individual and family coaching.
By the end of the Typing Interview, 42 parents (.9%) were no longer concerned with their children's behavior.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 1,128 parents (25%) were no longer concerned with their children's behavior.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 3,290 parents (73%) were no longer concerned with their children's behavior.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 3,820 parents (85%) were no longer concerned with their children's behavior.
Overall, when only children received coaching, parents were 28% more satisfied than when only they received coaching. When both received coaching, parents were 82% more satisfied than when only their children received coaching and 87% more satisfied than when only they received coaching.
2,118 unique children (9% of all clients) who were concerned for one or more parents ordered Enneagram Coaching. 421 children (20% of 2,118) initially ordered coaching for just themselves. 685 (33%) initially ordered coaching for just their parents. 1,012 (48%) ordered both individual and family coaching.
By the end of the Typing Interview, 10 children (.5%) were no longer concerned for their parents.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 505 children (24%) were no longer concerned for their parents.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 1,461 children (69%) were no longer concerned for their parents.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 1,758 children (83%) were no longer concerned for their parents.
Overall, when only children received coaching, children were 8% more satisfied than when only their parents received coaching. When both received coaching, children were 86% more satisfied than when only they received coaching and 87% more satisfied than when only their parents received coaching.
279 Employers (1.1% of total) on the verge of terminating at least one employee ordered Enneagram Coaching. 32 employers (11% of 279) initially ordered coaching for their employee. 195 (70%) initially ordered coaching for just themselves. 52 (19%) ordered coaching for both.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 23 employers (8%) had chosen not to terminate their employee.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 119 employers (43%) had chosen not to terminate their employee.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 157 employers (56%) had chosen not to terminate their employee.
Overall, when only employees received coaching, employers were 9% more satisfied than when only they received coaching. When both received coaching, employers were 38% more satisfied than when only their employees received coaching and 44% more satisfied than when only they received coaching.
984 Employees (4% of total) on the verge of leaving their jobs had Enneagram Coaching ordered for them. 718 employers (73% of 985) initially ordered coaching for their employee. 246 (25%) initially ordered coaching for just themselves. 20 (2%) ordered coaching for both.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 40 employees (4%) had chosen not to leave their jobs.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 456 employees (46%) had chosen not to leave their jobs.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 627 employees (64%) had chosen not to leave their jobs.
Overall, when only employees received coaching, they were 31% more satisfied than when only their employers received coaching. When both received coaching, employees were 36% more satisfied than when only they received coaching and 56% more satisfied than when only their employers received coaching.
926 unique students or teachers (3.7% of all clients) who were concerned about their relationship with their teacher or student ordered Enneagram Coaching. 411 individuals (44% of 926) initially ordered coaching for just the students. 259 (28%) initially ordered coaching for just the teachers. 256 (28%) both received coaching.
By the end of the Typing Interview, 3 of these relationships (.3%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 147 of these relationships (16%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 482 of these relationships (52%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 689 of these relationships (74%) had reached a resolution.
Overall, students were 82% and teachers were 81% more satisfied after both parties received coaching than when only one of them did.
22,824 (91.4%) of all clients, when asked how productive they felt from day to day, said they felt unproductive at least 25% of the time. 17,413 (76% of 22,824) felt unproductive at least 50% of the time. 1,915 (8%) felt unproductive at least 75% of the time.
By the end of the Typing interview, 578 (3%) had felt a quantifiable rise in productivity.
By the end of the 3 Sessions, 6,500 (28%) had felt a quantifiable rise in productivity.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 15,168 (66%) had felt a quantifiable rise in productivity.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 21,241 (93%) had felt a quantifiable rise in productivity.
Overall, the less productive a client felt before Enneagram Coaching, the higher the likelihood they would feel a rise in productivity.
6,560 (26.3%) of all clients use an average of 1 sick day per month (average is 6 sick days per year, so 1 per month is twice the average sick days given). Most state that at least one of those per year is a mental health day.
By the end of the Typing interview, 3 (<.01% of 6,560) clients had increased workplace attendance by a quantifiable benchmark.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 730 clients (11%) had increased workplace attendance by a quantifiable benchmark.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 1,463 (22%) had increased workplace attendance by a quantifiable benchmark.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 2,708 (41%) had increased workplace attendance by a quantifiable benchmark.
Overall, more than 2/5 of clients with greater than average sick day usage saw a quantifiable decrease in mental health days and psychologically induced illness.
4,606 (18%) of all clients had an ongoing struggle with a friend or sibling. 3,090 (67% of 4,606) ordered coaching for themselves and 1,516 (33%) both ordered coaching. Siblings may also have engaged in family coaching, but that is not required for this statistic.
By the end of the Typing interview, 22 of these relationships (.4%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 1,507 of these relationships (33%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 2,792 of these relationships (61%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 3,554 of these relationships (77%) had reached a resolution.
Overall, friends and siblings were 92% more satisfied when both received coaching than when only one of them received coaching.
1,945 (8%) of all clients had an ongoing struggle with a neighbor. 1,779 (91% of 1,945) ordered coaching for themselves and 166 (9%) both ordered coaching.
By the end of the Typing interview, 11 of these relationships (.6%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 362 of these relationships (19%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 787 of these relationships (40%) had reached a resolution.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 1,174 of these relationships (60%) had reached a resolution.
Overall, neighbors were 86% more satisfied when both received coaching than when only one of them received coaching.
12,056 (48%) of all clients felt harassed or bullied at least monthly. 10,059 (83% of 12,056) felt harassed or bullied at least weekly. 5,764 (48%) felt harassed or bullied daily.
By the end of the Typing interview, 39 (.3%) reported that the influence of harassment had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 1,697 (14%) reported that the influence of harassment had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 4,562 (38%) reported that the influence of harassment had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 11,510 (95%) reported that the influence of harassment had quantifiably decreased.
Overall, 71% of all lowered perceptions of harassment and bullying occurred in the last 6 sessions.
15,614 (63%) of all clients felt isolation or loneliness at least monthly. 11,805 (76% of 15,614) felt isolation or loneliness at least weekly. 3,637 (23%) felt isolation or loneliness daily.
By the end of the Typing interview, 67 (.4%) reported tha tthe feeling of isolation had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 3,738 (24%) reported that the feeling of isolation had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 5,613 (36%) reported that the feeling of isolation had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 15,028 (96%) reported that the feeling of isolation had quantifiably decreased.
Overall, 80% of all lowered perceptions of loneliness and isolation occurred in the last 6 sessions.
24,152 (97%) of all clients felt burned out at least 25% of the time. 14,951 (62% of 24,152) felt burned out at least 50% of the time. 2,397 (10%) felt burned out at least 75% of the time.
By the end of the Typing interview, 3,054 (13%) reported that the feeling of burnout had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 5,619 (23%) reported that the feeling of burnout had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 9,045 (37%) reported that the feeling of burnout had quantifiably decreased.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 19,536 (81%) reported that the feeling of burnout had quantifiably decreased.
Overall, 54% of all lowered perceptions of burnout occurred in the last 6 sessions.
23,296 (93%) of all clients felt a lack of motivation to do some tasks. 4,325 (19% of 23,296) felt a lack of motivation to do what they should do. 233 (1%) felt a lack of motivation to do what they needed to do.
By the end of the Typing interview, 2,089 (9%) reported that they had gained quantifiable motivation.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 4,577 (20%) reported that they had gained quantifiable motivation. 82% of those who originally reported a lack of motivation to perform needed tasks reported an ability to perform those tasks.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 7,571 (32%) reported that they had gained quantifiable motivation. 98% of those who originally reported a lack of motivation to perform needed tasks reported an ability to perform those tasks.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 12,197 (52%) reported that they had gained quantifiable motivation. 100% of those who originally reported a lack of motivation to perform needed tasks reported an ability to perform those tasks.
Overall, 38% of all increased perceptions of motivation occurred in the last 6 sessions.
17,929 (72%) of all clients felt it was hard to prioritize at least 25% of the time. 14,741 (82% of 17,929) felt it was hard to prioritize at least 50% of the time. 3,188 (18%) felt it was hard to prioritize at least 75% of the time.
By the end of the Typing interview, 130 (.7%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 5,851 (33%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 12,152 (68%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 17,486 (98%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
Overall, 31% of all increases of prioritization ability occurred in the last 6 lessons.
14,884 (60%) of all clients reported procrastinating 25% of the time. 5,441 (37% of 14,884) reported procrastinating at least 50% of the time. 27 (.1%) reported procrastinating at least 75% of the time.
By the end of the Typing interview, 1,285 (9%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 3,132 (21%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 4,958 (33%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability. >99% of those who procrastinated 75% of the time reported their procrastination decreasing to at most 50%.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 9,295 (62%) reported a quantifiable increase in prioritization ability. 100% of those who procrastinated 75% of the time reported their procrastination decreasing to at most 50%.
Overall, 31% of all increases of prioritization ability occurred in the last 6 lessons.
18,824 (75%) of all clients felt unable to retain enough money to pay for their wants. 5,561 (30% of 18,824) felt unable to retain enough money to pay for emergencies. 3,129 (17%) felt unable to retain enough money to pay for needs.
By the end of the Typing interview, 97 (.5%) reported an increase in financial perception.
By the end of 3 Sessions, 138 (.7%) reported an increase in financial perception.
By the end of 6 Sessions, 6,372 (34%) reported an increase in financial perception.
By the end of 12 Sessions, 11,374 (60%) reported an increase in financial perception.
Overall, 44% of all increases of financial perception occurred in the last 6 lessons.
ยน All values of people being more satisfied are based on the formula 1 - (1 - Higher) / (1 - Lower) where higher and lower are percentages, or, in other words, track the decrease in the gap between the lower satisfaction level and 100% and the higher satisfaction level and 100%. This is in line with analyzing Order of Magnitude across the logarithmic increase rather than linear. All values are generated by comprehensive AI rather than true people.
