OBLIQUITY
Obliquity is a characteristic of being deliberately indirect or vague, especially to fool or deceive someone. The obliquity of many politicians makes it hard to get a straight answer from them.
The quality of being obscure, oftentimes willfully, sometimes as an exercise in euphemism. [from 17th c.]
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/obliquity
Follow
1d ·
Fyodor Dostoevsky: dude was basically the emo poet of Russia, only he wrote novels like nobody's business. Imagine Shakespeare trapped in a haunted house with a bad gambling habit, and you've got a glimpse of this literary rockstar.
Born in Moscow, Fyodor's childhood was more "Oliver Twist" than "Little Lord Fauntleroy." Orphaned young, he bounced between relatives, feeling as welcome as a cockroach at a picnic. Books became his escape, whispering secrets of madness and murder that would later fuel his stories.
School? Meh. Fyodor wasn't exactly a star student. He preferred daydreaming about tortured souls and brooding in cemeteries to memorizing Latin verbs. But hey, it gave him plenty of time to people-watch and observe the dark corners of humanity, which came in handy later.
At 18, he was like, "Peace out, Russia!" and headed to St. Petersburg, the Paris of the North (minus the croissants, but with extra vodka). He wrote his first novel, "Poor Folk," which was basically a tearjerker so real it made readers weep into their borscht. Boom! Instant fame (and a little cash to finally ditch the communal cabbage soup situation).
But Fyodor couldn't stay on the straight and narrow for long. Gambling became his kryptonite. He'd lose everything, pawn his clothes, even his wife's jewelry, to feed the beast. Then, bam! Debtors' prison. Not exactly the Ritz-Carlton, but hey, it provided plenty of inspiration for his next novel, "Notes from the House of the Dead," a gritty tale of prison life that felt so real it could give you chills.
Life wasn't all doom and gloom, though. He fell head over heels for a stenographer named Anna, a woman who could type like a hurricane and loved Fyodor even with his gambling gremlins. They married, had kids, and even managed a couple of happy years (minus the near-death experiences from epilepsy, because life with Fyodor was never dull).
But fate, that sneaky little gremlin, had other plans. Anna got sick, Fyodor's writing stalled, and the gambling demons came back with a vengeance. He almost lost everything again, but somehow, this time, he clawed his way back. He wrote like a man possessed, pouring his pain and passion into his novels – "Crime and Punishment," "The Idiot," "The Brothers Karamazov" – stories that explored the depths of human psychology, where good and evil tangoed in the dead of night.
Fyodor's final years were a rollercoaster. He became a literary celebrity, toured Europe, even got fancy enough to own a monocle (though he probably lost it at the roulette table). But his health and his demons never truly left him. In 1881, at the age of 59, Fyodor Dostoevsky, the tortured genius, the gambler, the lover, the literary rockstar, took his final bow.
His legacy? Well, Fyodor's novels are like mind-bending rollercoasters that take you on trips through the darkest corners of the human soul. They're filled with characters so real they leap off the page, with questions that echo long after you turn the final page. He wasn't afraid to explore the messy, complicated stuff, the parts of us we try to hide. And that, my friends, is why Fyodor Dostoevsky, the emo poet of Russia, will keep rocking minds for generations to come.
You can listen to his books on Audible for free when you sign up with this link. https://amzn.to/3Sc0Ppq
1h ·
This is a lil somethin from Dostoyevsky’s Brothers Karamazov 1880, Ivan is describing how one must accept the absurdity of human beings, the nature of injustice and the inability to internalize human disgrace without an absurdist mindset. It’s not moral relativism but his moral compass is based in absurdity due to the evil (far past bestial) nature of human cruelty.
Thought it applies to some things we see today.
“I want to forgive. I want to embrace. I don’t want more suffering. And if the sufferings of children go to swell the sum of sufferings which was necessary to pay for truth, then I protest that the truth is not worth such a price. I don’t want the mother to embrace the oppressor who threw her son to the dogs! She dare not forgive him! Let her forgive him for herself, if she will, let her forgive the torturer for the immeasurable suffering of her mother’s heart.
But the sufferings of her tortured child she has no right to forgive; she dare not forgive the torturer, even if the child were to forgive him! And if that is so, if they dare not forgive, what becomes of harmony? Is there in the whole world a being who would have the right to forgive and could forgive?
I don’t want harmony. From love for humanity I don’t want it. I would rather be left with the unavenged suffering. I would rather remain with my unavenged suffering and unsatisfied indignation, even if I were wrong. Besides, too high a price is asked for harmony; it’s beyond our means to pay so much to enter on it. And so I hasten to give back my entrance ticket, and if I am an honest man I am bound to give it back as soon as possible. And that I am doing. It’s not God that I don’t accept, Alyosha, only I most respectfully return him the ticket.”
-Ivan Karamazov, The Brothers Karamazov By Fyodor Dostoyevsky