Reading through the different artificial creatures, Lotte Dolle’s proposal stuck out to me. She talked about the quality of obedience, which I found very interesting. Being obedient is something I believe both humans, animals, and technology share. Humans can be obedient to each other, animals can listen to their trainers, and technology can follow people’s commands. At the same time, I also believe that all of us share the aptitude for rebellion. Lotte also discusses this, proposing an artificial creature which rebels against its controller.
This exploration of obedience vs. rebellion had me thinking about society’s attitudes towards this kind of behaviour. In humans, rebellion can be seen as both negative and positive. We expect people to follow laws and be obedient to societal customs, but at the same time, we can admire some’s rebellious nature. For example, Rosa Parks’s stand against racial segregation rules is seen as a historic act of rebellion that altered American history and has inspired many to face injustice across the world.
Rebellion of artificial intelligence and creatures, however, is something most of us fear. As humans, we make tools and use technology and expect these things to be obedient to us. We do not want our ovens to rebel against us when we are cooking, and we hate it when our computers don’t operate the way we want them to. Just like Lotte described, in movies, rebellious technology is usually a sign of the apocalypse, of evil computers taking over the world and destroying humanity.
In this way, we can forgive and even admire disobedience in humans, but we get frustrated or are even intolerant of rebellion in other creatures.
After having considered Lotte’s exploration of obedience, I thought up an artificial creature that also deals with this quality. One of the aspects that inspired me most about Lotte’s idea was the concept of respect and loyalty and the relation of these to obedience. I find these qualities to be crucial for a well-functioning society, and we should extend this respect to the technological tools that we use.
With this in mind, I imagined an artificial creature comprised of a button and a lamp.
At first, this lamp is on and shining brightly, but as time passes, it will dim and eventually go out. To relight the lamp, a person will need to press the button attached to it.
However, this act of pressing the button is not as straightforward as it seems. Depending on how long it took someone to press the button, the lamp will stay on for a longer or shorter duration. In a way, the lamp will respond to how “loyal” someone is in turning it back on. If it takes a short time, the lamp will feel respected and obediently stay on for a longer time. If a person waits too long to press the button, the lamp will feel disrespected and rebelliously try to turn off its light faster.
The lamp will also respond to acts of “frustration”. If someone pressed the button multiple times in quick succession, the lamp will interpret this as impatience and disrespect and will also turn off faster. If the button has been abandoned for a long time, the lamp will refuse to turn back on, fully rebelling against the user.