The blog “Robots can have pretty privilege, too” fascinated me because it draws a surprisingly human concept into the realm of artificial creatures. Ella highlights how simple design features, such as round shapes and eye-like elements, evoke empathy and cooperation from humans. What resonated most with me was how the author connects aesthetics and moral behavior: the softer, more “organic” the creature looks, the more likely we are to treat it with care.
I found this particularly thought-provoking because it suggests that our ethical relationships with artificial beings are not based on rational assessment (the fact that it is a robot) but on emotional projection. The Finnish delivery robots and the Tweenbot both demonstrate how cuteness becomes a bridge between human and artificial. Yet, this raises the question if empathy can be engineered through design, is that a form of manipulation? Are we genuinely caring for another being or are we reacting to signals that trigger our nurturing instincts?
My own view expands on this: perhaps ‘pretty privilege’ in robots isn’t only about aesthetics but about narrative framing. A round, struggling robot doesn’t just look cute, but we humans love stories and roundness happens to make that story more believable and less threatening. A sharp-edged robot, in contrast, tells a different story; one of coldness or danger. Thus, pretty privilege might be less about “prettiness” and more about emotional readability.
This blog sparked my idea for the artwork: The Helpfulness Index, which is an interactive installation designed to measure human willingness to assist artificial creatures of varying aesthetic design. The piece explores how form, motion, and expression influence empathy and intervention. In a gallery space, visitors encounter two small robots moving through a miniature obstacle course. Each robot performs the same task: navigating a series of ramps and gentle barriers. However each has a distinct design personality:
The Sphere: round, pastel-colored, with two animated eyes.
The Cube: angular, metallic, minimal expression.
Throughout the exhibition, subtle challenges are introduced: a ramp too steep, a dropped object, a stuck wheel, etc. Sensors and motion tracking record how often visitors intervene to assist each robot, how long they hesitate and what emotional cues they express (through facial recognition or proximity sensors).
A live display visualizes real-time ‘helpfulness data’ forming an evolving Helpfulness Index; a kind of emotional barometer of the crowd’s empathy. Over time patterns emerge: are we more likely to help the Sphere than the Cube? Do we attribute ‘personality’ to one over another?
The Helpfulness Index invites us to question not only the design of robots but the design of our own empathy. If a robot’s shape can determine whether it is helped or ignored, what does that say about our readiness to extend care to those who don’t fit our expectations of beauty or softness?