Click here for larger view

The map produced using different resolution showed a clear difference in the quality of image produced by each DEMs. It is obvious that the 2 m and 10 m DEMs gave images that are close to real life image. They will be useful for producing maps with more topography detail. The 5 m DEM look good too but not as the 2 m and 10 m, the image produced look rough. On the other hand, the image produced by th 30 m DEM looks blurry, this is due to more area being displayed within each pixel. I will recommend 2 m and 10 m DEM for the project because of the image quality. Click here for pdf of image comparing the DEMs

The 10 m and 2 m contour seems to be on point. The 30 m DEM show a clear evidence of deviation from the elevation peak points. Both the 10 m and 30 m DEMs have obvious pixel. However, the area captured within each pixel value differ; with the 30 m having more that is why there is a large digression of the elevation peak. The 5 m DEM also deviate a little. Click here for pdf of image of elevation peaks.