Resources

Recommended articles

Articles about tailoring

• Cappella (2006). Integrating Message Effects and Behavior Change Theories: Organizing Comments and Unanswered Questions. Journal of Communication, 56, S265-S279.

• Fishbein, Cappella (2006). The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications. Journal of Communication, 56, S1-S17.

• Kroeze, Werkman, Brug (2006). A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(3), 205-223.

• Noar, Benac, Harris (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673-693.

• Strecher (2007). Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health‐related interventions (eHealth). Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 53‐76.

• Dijkstra (2008). The Psychology of Tailoring-Ingredients in Computer-Tailored Persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 765-784.

• Hawkins, Kreuter, Resnicow, Fishbein, Dijkstra (2008). Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Education Research 23(3): 454-466.

• Oenema, Brug, Dijkstra, de Weerdt, de Vries (2008). Efficacy and use of an internet‐delivered computer‐tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35(2): 125‐135.

• Lustria, Cortese, Noar, Glueckhauf (2009). Computer‐tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(2): 156-73.

• Neville, O'Hara, Milat (2009). Computer‐tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Education Research, 24(4): 699-720.

Articles about ECoach

• Huberth, Michelotti, McKay, (2013). E2Coach: Tailoring Support for Students in Introductory STEM Courses. EDUCAUSE Review, 48: 6. 

• Wright, McKay, Hershock, Miller, Tritz, (2014). Better Than Expected: Using Learning Analytics to Promote Student Success in Introductory Gateway Science. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(1): 28-34. 

• Huberth, Chen, Tritz, McKay, (2015). Computer-Tailored Student Support in Introductory Physics. PloS ONE, 10(9): e0137001. 

• Brown, DeMonbrun, Teasley, (2017). Don’t call it a comeback: academic recovery and the timing of educational technology adoption. LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, March 2017: 489-493. [Best LAK Paper Nominee]

• Chen, Chavez, Ong, Gunderson (2017). Strategic Resource Use for Learning: A Self-Administered Intervention That Guides Self-Reflection on Effective Resource Use Enhances Academic Performance. Psychological Science, 28(6): 774-785.

• Matz, et al., (2021). Analyzing the Efficacy of ECoach in Supporting Gateway Course Success Through Tailored Support. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, April 2021: 216-225.. 

• Matz, Derry, Bennett, LaRose, & Hayward, (2022, February 24-26). Behavioral Nudges Improve Student Outcomes on Mastery-based Assessments in Precalculus [Paper presentation]. 24th Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education (RUME), Boston, MA.

• Chen, Teo, Foo, Derry, Hayward, Schulz, Hayward, McKay, Ong, (2022) Real-world effectiveness of a social-psychology intervention translated from controlled trials to classrooms. npj Science of Learning, 7, 20.