Reformatting Logbook
Changing page name
Click to edit page (top right)
Select Page name and change it
Creating new page
Click to create a new page (top right)
Input page name and placement options
Moving page
Click More OptionsÂ
Select the move page option
Select a new parent page for your current webpage
Project Choice Research
Research project choices and write a summary paragraph for each
Preferably ASAP
Definitely before next week
 Group
 Bill Dorland
 Kaustubh Agashe
 Kaustubh Agashe
 IceCube UMD group / IceCube Neutrino Observatory
 LZ next-generation Dark Matter experiment
 Sarah Eno
 CMS LHC Group: Sarah Eno, Alberto Belloni, Andris Skuja, Shabnam Jabeen
 CMS LHC Group: Sarah Eno, Alberto Belloni, Andris Skuja, Shabnam Jabeen
 CMS LHC Group: Sarah Eno, Alberto Belloni, Andris Skuja, Shabnam Jabeen
 Projects
 Benchmarking a new code for the simulation of fusion and astrophysical plasmas
 Top Quark properties at LHC
 study of exotic, new physics models using simulation tools such as MADGRAPH
 Data analysis of the IceCube experimental data
 LZ next-generation Dark Matter experiment
 Segmented crystal calorimeters for future colliders
 Searching for new physics beyond the standard model in the known W and Z boson physics
 CMS Calorimeter
 Learn how to build and manage one of the computing clusters of the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) based at UMD.Â
 Provided Description and Personal Research into Project
We have developed a new tool for the study of fusion and astrophysical plasmas, called Gkeyll (or Hyde when it's fussing at us), which numerically solves a set of equations known as the Vlasov-Maxwell system. As of right now, we are one of the few Vlasov-Maxwell codes in the world (and the only one we're aware of that can treat multiple species in the same simulation), which makes this a prime opportunity to study physics which only the Vlasov-Maxwell system can capture. This includes (but is not limited to): ...
Astrophysical Plasmas:
The vast volume of plasma that makes up most of the volume of the universe
strongly influenced by electromagnetic forces
overall electrically neutral, but due to its complexity, charge imbalances often occur temporarily
Vlasov-Maxwell system:
"A differential equation describing the time evolution of the distribution function of a plasma consisting of charged particles with long-range interaction"
Basically made to calculate the distribution of astrophysical plasmas
Apparently really difficult to solve...? (like most differential equations)
The heaviest of quarks is so heavy that it decays before it can even hadronize, giving us an opportunity to study "bare" quarks.
"bare" quarks:
Quarks are usually not "bare" because they naturally hadronize and neutralize their color (resulting in jets in particle colliders), but apparently, the decay rate for the really heavy top quarks are faster than the hadronization process, so they don't result in jets...?
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/108131/very-short-decay-a-bare-quark
study of exotic, new physics models using simulation tools such as MADGRAPH
"Incompleteness" of the Standard Model:
strong CP problem?
Neutrino oscillations (they have mass)?
Dark matter and dark energy?
Matter antimatter asymmetry?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_beyond_the_Standard_Model
 IceCube Explained:
A Neutrino detector at the South Pole
involved with addressing questions like the nature of dark matter and the properties of the neutrino
 Cosmological measurements show that about 85% of the matter, labeled as dark matter, in the universe does not interact with electromagnetic radiation such as light, and cannot be described by the Standard Model particles, the current theory of fundamental particles, and their interaction. Â
We are working on LZ Dark Matter Experiment located at Sanford Underground Research Facility, nearly 1 mile underground, in Lead South Dakota. It employs liquified Xenon to detect the interaction of the dark matter particles with the Xenon nucleus. The dark matter particle imparts energy to the Xenon nucleus which is subsequently released as charged particles and electromagnetic radiation. Â
We will work on the calibration of observed energy and develop software to analyze the data using PYTHON and ROOT.
 Scientists explore the fundamental particles and forces using high energy particle colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider. Large experimental apparatuses such as the CMS detector are used to identify the types of particles produced in the collisions and measure their energies and momenta. An essential subdetector in all modern high energy physics experiments is the calorimeter. In the past, calorimeter design could be optimized either for the measurement of photons/electrons or for hadrons (particles containing quarks). However, simulations of a new proposed calorimeter (https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00338) suggest precision measurements of both are possible using modern techniques. However, the efficacy of this calorimeter depends on the details of the underlying simulation of nuclear interactions. In this project, we will:
·    Learn how to simulate a simple calorimeter using GEANT4
·    Learn how to run the simulation of the calorimeter used for the work in the paper
·    Vary the parameters of the nuclear physics model in GEANT4 to see how to affects the production of low-velocity protons in the shower crucial to this type of calorimeter
 There are many different modes of production that we can search for. One of these is precision studies of the known production modes of the W and Z bosons at the LHC can provide hints of new physics beyond the standard model. Some of the new physics models the current analysis at UMD will set limits on are:
Technicolor-like: arXiv:1608.01675
 (or we could call it "dark top" since technicolor is technically dead...)Charged Higgs: arXiv:1809.09127
F-mesons: arXiv:1411.3310
 and Phys.Rev.D91.055007folded supersymmetry (squarks): https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.4667
(Similar to Segmented crystal calorimeters for future colliders)
More information has yet to be provided
 The Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) at the Large Hadron Collider . is composed of four levels, or “Tiers”, called 0, 1, 2, and 3. Each Tier is made up of several computer centers and provides a specific set of services. Between them, the tiers process, store and analyze all the data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
One such computing Tier3 center is owned by the Physics High Energy group at the University of Maryland.
If you are interested in computing and management tools being used by one of the largest labs in the world, this is the place to be.
Assigned: Learn how to build and manage one of the computing clusters of the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG)Â based at UMD
Prepare presentation; research terms: LHC Research Grid, UMD tier 3 research grid
Discussion of free will
Casimir effect
Wolfram physics project
Everything may be determined from the beginning, but the result is not something any of us may know.Â
So, I choose to believe in this illusion called free will. Even if the result is set in stone, I can only continue to do what I do to see it through.
Research group discussion:
Useful links:
UMD Cluster Homepage:
UMD Cluster Monitoring page:
CERN LHC Computing Grid
CERN Computing CLuster Tier Listing
Topics to research:
CentOS
Apache Hadoop
Big Data
HTCondor
Foreman and Puppet
NIS Protocol
Prepare a short presentation on the assigned research topic by next week
Group Presentations
LZ Experiment
Dark Matter Summary
Extra mass that can't be seen
Galaxies exhibit extra mass at the edges of the galaxy (usually)
Candidates
Doesn't interact electromagnetically
Probably not baryonic
Has a lot of mass
Primordial black holes?
Some new particle?
Background
LZ Experiment
Far underground, surrounded by water
to shield from unwanted particles
Xe core which absorbs energy from particle collisions
Scintillation
light released can be used to identify particles
WIMPs
Weakly Interacting Massive Particles
What Students Did Last year
Analyze simulated data
Setting up Linux environment
Coding
Some Tools
Python, C++, and ROOT
IceCube
What is IceCube
Observatory in the south pole
Detects neutrinos (high energy)
through reactions with water and ice
Multinational collaboration (like LHC)
IceCube @ UMD
Sponsored by Dr. Erik Blaufuss
UMD Research Scientist for over 20 years
IceCube Detector
observes neutrinos from violent astrophysical sources
Detector made up of 5160 digital optical modules
When neutrinos pass through the ice, electrically charged particles produced
Particles emit Cherenkox light
Expected detection rate?
???
can detect low energy down to 10 TeV
Computing Group (My group)
Lookup
oVirt
Open Science Grid
Top Quark at LHC
Background Information
t --> W-b
Tools
MadGraph5
Monte Carlo Simulation
The Top Quark
Heaviest standard model particle
Week One
invariance of two-body decay kinematics
Group presentations
IceCube Group
How many neutrinos are passing through a given volume of space at a given time? How does that compare to the amount of neutrino detected at IceCube
Solar neutrino flux: ~3e12 per m^2 per sec
background neutrinos: ~100,000 per year
Signal Neutrinos: ~100 per year
Does the direction of a neutrino's origin or source affect the results detected at IceCube
direction matters for sifting out noise from the signal
Leptons emit Cherenkov radiation in ice
cosmic-ray sources: downward direction
Neutrino sources: any direction
Energy helps paint a better picture
If the path starts within the array, then it's probably a neutrino
if it comes from above, then probably not
if it comes from below, then probably something interesting
Want to detect neutrinos from celestial events
High energy is more likely
From below is more likely
from above has a bigger chance of being a neutrino from a cosmic ray decay (not what we want)
What is Glaciology? Why is it important?
Old ice, not like normal ice
The study of the optics of the ice is important in lessening the error of the detector
Not a major component of systematic errors due to the neutrinos having such high energy
Cherenkov Radiation
the movement of the particle through the medium is faster than light in the medium
kinda like a sonic boom
Project updates
mainly in python
NumPy
Matplotlib
Access to complete public data release from IceCube
Machine learning
a lot of Background reading
LZ Dark Matter Experiment
The theory behind Dark Matter
doesn't interact or emit light
~27% of the universe
Based on the theory of general relativity
A brief history of the universe
Temperature goes down as time elapses
Cosmic microwave background radiation
black body radiation
hot things emit light
association between temperature and time used to estimate particle composition of the universe
so ~27% of the universe
Dark matter evidence (rotational curves)
Looking at the galaxy, orbital speed is flat because mass is distributed evenly
Galaxy clusters, flat rotation curves as well
Research Goals
LZ experiment extends previous work by LUX and others
Want to reproduce results on sensitivity with the LZ detector
with simulated data
Simulating Data
including background noise
half the sensitivity calculation is estimating background noise
the other half is simulating what data looks like
Neutrinos discovery limit
Neutrinos are very similar to WIMPs
The shape of the sensitivity graph
detection is limited at small masses because it's hard to detect things at small energies
Why does it get harder as the mass gets larger? (to be addressed)
Computing Group Presentation (My Group)
.privnet
resolve.con file
umd.edu vs. privnet?
presentation of nodeÂ
if kicked out of VM
how would you get back into it?
Top Quark at LHC Group
Research goal
reproduce paper
Some introductions
top quark decay
extremely shortlived
use conservation laws to...?
Special relativity
Lorentz transformation
used to analyze particles in different frames
Two Body Decay: An Ideal Case
B decays into two particles
one of which is massless
Process of analysis
convert lab frame to rest frame
use natural units
calculated energy-momentum in the rest frame of B
Energy momentum of the lab as related to energy-momentum at rest
the Lorentz transformation and angle of decay is different for each experiment
Assuming B is unpolarized, cos(\theta) distribution is constant
simplifies the energy-momentum conversion to depend on just one variable
What if both particles have mass?
introduce another variable to account for it
Top Quark at LHC Group
honestly, idk...
Want to find upper and lower bounds for the theta based rectangle
how does this rectangle relate to the top quark?
probability distribution piece of rest energy
Rectangles symmetrical under log(x)
will be using Madgraph soon
Getting a distribution function for the rectangles
get the extremum (max) of the distribution functionÂ
what if there's more than one extremum?
proof not yet complete
Computing Group
Task: experiment with sites migration
LZ Dark Matter Group
Detecting particle interactions
Goes through a xenon gas chamber
Creates two flashes of light per particle interaction
S1 and S2
Generated Data
S1 signal is short and weak compared to the S2 signal that's longer and larger
Amplification
photomultiplier tube
Interaction Types
Single Scatter
Multiple Scatter
Kr85m
S2 Only/ Pileup
A glimpse into the Code
create an enum for interaction types
filter out interactions that happen outside the xenon chamber
Only consider single scatter events
Only interacts once
because multiple interactions are highly improbable for dark matter
Moving forward
getting familiar with the code
recreate plots from simulated data
IceCube Group
Updates
Weakly interacting, have mass, but not WIMPs
What affects them?
Gravity, General relativity, Weak Force
What doesn't affect them?
EM, strong force
Cross-section
higher energy, higher the cross-section (likelihood to react)
Neutrino Flavor (Type)
Electron, Muon, Tau
Neutrino decay into its corresponding lepton...?
Neutrino Oscillation (so cool...)
Neutrinos don't keep their original flavor
Probabilities change as the neutrino travels...?
So, must have mass
Muon
Straight track
Hard to tell their energy
Less than 1 deg error uncertainty
don't love interacting with matter
Travel about 1 km before losing all energy
Electron
Cascade
lots of interactions
Easier to tell the energy
10 deg of angular uncertainty
Tau
Double bang
Not yet observed
not created in cosmic ray interactions
Neutrino oscillation after pion decay 1:2:0 (el, mu, tau)
Travel about 100 m before decaying
Point Source Analysis
When Cherenkov light is detected in the tank, position and energy are recorded
used to determine point source of particle
Binned Methods
segment sky into buckets
Compare the number of events to the expected number of events from background scrambling
If one bucket has a lot of events, telescopes should be focused on that sky area more
Tools Available
Python
Docker
Housekeeping
The goal of the project assignment due midnight today
For our computing group:
look into past logbooks for details
Using GPUs for Machine learning
Assignment: Book report for Discovery of the God Particle
Curiosity Journal linked in the syllabus: contains past papers for reference
IceCube Group
Point Source Search
Hard to find because the energy level tends to be similar to the background
Assume background neutrinos as constant
Spatial distributions
Point source forms a single point where neutrinos are consistently found to be from
The background is mostly constant
Probability
consistent with background + signal vs background only
Software, Installation, and Run
Docker
containerization Software
JupyterLab
better than Google Colab...? I think not.
Using Docker engine
publish an image on a server
ssh to it
Astronomical Terms
MJD
modified Julian Date
Days from midnight on Nov 17, 1858
RA
celestial longitude
Dec
celestial latitude
Azimuth and Zenith
RA and Dec of the Sun
LZ Dark Matter Group
Eliminating background signals
cosmic ray reduction at 1 mile below the surface
passive shielding from the water tank
veto system
eliminates everything other than a single scatter
Other methods
clean surface
pure xenon
Outside sources that cannot be eliminated experimentally
neutrino scattering
Xenon decay
Getting rid of backgrounds
remove radioactive contaminants (as much as possible)
Underground
Multiple filter layers
water - muons interact and decay into neutrons
neutron interacting liquid
Radioactive decay with short lifespans can be eliminated
How much background should be expected
electron/nuclear events
1131/1.03 total events from normal sources over a 1000-day run
after analysis cuts: 5.66/0.52 events
if the reality is significantly different from the expected background, then we may have found dark matter
Future directions
code review done
begin remaking signal plots
Computing Group
Embedding markup language?
Use an HTML Box
Insert > HTML Box
Include <script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/tutts/google-sites-markdown/index.js"></script>
then you can just write markdown between the script tags which will be parsed as markdown
Top Quark at LHC Group
my bad... was figuring out embedded markup stuff...
The goal is to recreate the mass histogram of top quark decay
Computing group presentation
FINISH NODE SET UP BY NEXT WEEK!
LZ Dark Matter Experiment
Nuclear decay chains
radon could be long-lived or short-lived, which makes identifying the interactions more difficult
The Data
most interaction occurs near the edge of the detector before the particles reach the center
a weird tail that doesn't match the paper graph
Future directions
more simulations and plot generations
Ice Cube
Where are events coming from?
Southern Sky, no earth to filter so all taken with a grain of salt
Northern Sky, earth in the way, assumed to be neutrino events
Horizon, a little bit of earth as a filter, better than the southern sky in terms of filtered events, and better than the northern sky in terms of capturing higher energy neutrinos
data artifacts
any error in perception or representation of any information, introduced by involved equipment or technique
regular distribution of optic detectors results in periodic peaks and troughs of detection despite even distribution of events
a more curved sunflower-like distribution should even out this effect
Top Quark
Attempting event simulation with MadGraph and Matematica
currently working on the code
file transfer from room to Matematica?Â
Ice Cube
Bins and points
points don't disappear, but smaller bins mean that the error of any single point is not properly represented
too many bins => divide by zero errors
Optimizing the number of declination bins
tried all values for declination bins in a range of values
tried finding the natural number of declination bins in the sky and using that number
Unbinned Analysis
The likelihood approach
assumes probability distribution of data is the most probable distribution
k-means clustering
Dark Matter
Event counts
most events don't interact (not detected)
especially in the background; possible filtering?
The background is weird...
events mostly clustered in the 0 bin? not a normal distribution
The other category is very large in the background dataset
reserved for events that can't be classified into other categories
Computing Group
Build a NN from scratch
Top Quark
Varying collider energy
peak stays put, but shape changes
not enough time... to be finished in the next class
Weekly Presentations
Top Quark
at varied collider energies, peaks should be at the same place
but the simulated data doesn't seem to show this
debugged log scale graphing
The next step is to generate graphs for initial state radiation, in which a gluon is radiated at the beginning of the process
Computing group
Build NN Demo by next week
Dark Matter
large bin at zero explained
radon decay has zero parent energy since the radon is not moving at relativistic speeds, and radon makes up a significant portion of the background signals
WIMP and H3
almost no H3 background at 18 GeV, whereas WIMP signal generally increases as GeV increases, so it's a good place to look for WIMPs
Next steps
reproducing the s1s2 graph from the paper
IceCube
tested analysis on TXS 0506+056, which is a known high neutrino source
however, the point source didn't manage to stick out from the background
so, oof
Making the binned method better?
possible, but not very much, and kinda arbitrary or computationally difficult
Maybe just go with the unbinned method
Quantum weirdness
Bell's experiments
only rules out local hidden variables
Pilot Wave Theory? (Maybe something to look into)
Entanglement experiments
observing lights through gravitational lensing?
create the entangled particle yourself
Measurements questions:
timing?
EOF Stub