The Instructional Designer (ID) is responsible for gathering information during the analysis phase to determine the training configuration for the project (review types of analysis here). Through analysis, the ID determines if using a job aid (JA) will be part of the training configuration. The ID also determines the desired on-the-job performance that helps in developing performance requirements. Performance requirements guide the ID in designing and developing the training. What exactly are JAs and performance requirements? Below, I will define each of these further and when they are useful.
Image by Rattanakun Thongbun from Canva
According to Jeannette Gautier-Downes and Allison Rosset (1999) a JA is “a repository for information, processes, or perspectives that is external to the individual that supports work and actively by directing, guiding, and enlightening performance” (as cited in Willmore, 2018, pg. 12). In other words, a JA is used by performers to help them remember information to improve or support their task performance. A JA is not the tool used to actually perform the task, but it can provide information to perform a task. JAs can be standalone aids, or they can be combined with other JAs to create a system of s that link together to support performance. JAs are likely going to be cost effective for an organization, user friendly, and easy to maintain. (OPWL Instructors, 2020).
Below are common formats and examples of JAs.
(Adapted from OPWL 537 Course Instructors, 2020, Table 7.1, pp. 141-142)
JAs are not always going to be the ideal option. As the ID, it is your responsibility to gather information during your analysis phase to determine if JAs will be the best option. (Review the various analysis here). According to Willmore (2018) below are general situations that you may determine JAs to be a good fit (pp. 49-51):
Sequence is critical to the task
The JA enhances the performer’s confidence
Consequences of worker error are high
The task is rarely used or infrequently performed
The task can easily go wrong
The job depends on frequently changing information
A JA is a superior alternative to some training
A task is complex but can be easily described in detail
A task requires a large body of information to be completed successfully
Keep in mind, the JA format also matters. A JA format that works for one task may not be the best option for another task. So, the ID will need to consider all of these factors when designing and developing the best job aid option for their client.
In my experience, I have come to realize that we utilize JAs more frequently than we think. For many people, we are using them every day to jog our memory as we juggle different roles and responsibilities. For example, the grocery list or iPhone reminders. In a more formal learning environment, we are using them to help us build confidence and prevent errors. As an ID, this is an opportunity to use creativity to create a visually appealing, user friendly, and cost-effective resource that both your client and performer will find useful and want to use for their performance.
Performance requirements are statements created by the ID to describe the intended outcome of the instruction and the desired on-the-job performance. Therefore, “performance requirements represent a promise of valued behavior change in the workplace” (OPWL Instructors, 2020, p. 161).
For an ID, “Crafting performance requirements marks the move from describing exemplary performance in the workplace (analysis) to designing and developing instruction that will enable others in the organization to act more like the exemplars – which will close the performance gap” (OPWL Instructors, 2020, p. 162).
Performance requirements represent what performers should be able to do on-the-job. Performance requirements are essential for IDs because they become their guide during the design phase. Not only can performance requirements help the ID determine what to include in training, but performance requirements can help the ID determine what not to include in training since the desired performance has been determined (OPWL Instructors, 2020, p. 165).
Performance requirements are typically written for the critical tasks that were identified during the task analysis. Critical tasks are tasks that performers don’t know how to perform but must be done to achieve the desired performance. When conducting your tasks analyses you should have identified three components of the critical task which include: the conditions, performance, and criteria. These three components make up the performance requirements statements:
Conditions- conditions under which on-the-job performance will occur.
For example: Using a thermometer
Keep in mind, if you have determined that JAs will be used during performance, then the JA is considered a condition.
Performance- the on-the-job performance learners will perform
For example: Receivers will take the trailer temperature.
Criteria- the on-the-job performance that is acceptable.
For example: Immediately upon truck’s arrival to the dock.
The following table provides further explanation of each components.
(OPWL Instructors, 2020, 162)
Once you have identified these three components you can create well developed performance requirements that both the ID team and client agree upon. The ID can then begin to utilize them as their guide in developing the design deliverables.
In my experience, performance requirements can go through several iterations between you and your client before you agree upon a final statement. Spend the time in the analysis phase to work with your client to identify the critical tasks so that you can develop strong performance requirements. This will help ensure your design deliverables are in alignment throughout the project.
Willmore, J. (2018). Job aid basics (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ATD.
OPWL 537 Course Instructors (2020). Instructional Design Course Handbook. Boise, ID: Boise State department of Organizational Performance and Workplace Learning.
Rothwell, W., Benscoter, B., King, M., & King, S. B. (2016). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.