Hattie's Research for Leaders

Facilitator: Lori Gracey (@lgracey)

http://ly.tcea.org/researchforleader

Session Description

John Hattie’s research doesn’t just address teachers in the classroom. Discover what he found out about best practices for leaders, too.

Goals for Today

Gain a quick understanding of what a meta analysis and an effect size are and why they matter in looking at research.

Examine the two types of school leaders and see the effect size of each.

Evaluate your own leadership with six key questions.

An Exciting Look at Statistics!

There are lots of educational studies and research available. The question is, how can you know what is valid and relevant and worth your time?


The best way is to examine meta-analyses.

In other words, we want to see

an effect size higher than 0.4

as a gauge of what is proven to work.

John Hattie's Visible Learning Research

The book Visible Learning was introduced by John Hattie in his groundbreaking meta study Visible Learning (2009).

He has since gone on to write Visible Learning for Teachers and Visible Learning in Action.

More than 800 meta-analyses of research studies for his initial study

More than 1,400 meta-analyses of 80,000 studies involving 300 million students for his final data

Compared effect sizes of the many aspects/strategies that influence learning outcomes.

What Hattie Found

Strategies That Don't Work

Summer vacation (-.02)

CAI in distance education (.01)

Single sex schools (.08)

Modifying school calendars/timetables (.09)

Reduced class size (.21)

Strategies That Do Work

Collective teacher efficacy (1.57)

Self-reported grades/student expectations (1.33)

Cognitive task analysis (1.29)

Response to intervention (1.29)

Jigsaw method (1.20)

Conceptual change programs (0.99)

Teacher credibility (0.90)

Micro-teaching/video review of lessons (0.88)

Classroom discussion (0.82)

Teacher clarity (0.75)

Two Types of Educational Leaders

Transformational

Sets a vision

Creates common goals

Inspires the troops

Buffers external demands

Staffs well

Gives teachers autonomy








Effect size of 0.11

Instructional

Believes that student learning is about what teachers and leaders do or don’t do

Focuses on the impact of teaching on learning

Sets challenging targets to maximize student outcomes

Sees assessment as feedback on adults’ actions

Evaluates every staff member’s impact on student learning

Understands the importance of listening to students’ and teachers’ voices

Creates an environment in which everyone can learn from errors without losing face


Effect size of 0.42

Believing in evaluating one’s impact as a leader: 0.91

Getting colleagues focused on evaluating their impact: 0.91

Focusing on high-impact teaching and learning: 0.84

Being explicit with teachers and students about what success looks like: 0.77

Setting appropriate levels of challenge and never retreating to “just do your best:” 0.57

Questions for the Leader to Answer

What success have I had in creating a climate for quality teaching, and can I provide evidence of creating and valuing discussions among my teachers about their teaching?

How am I creating a safe psychological climate for engagement, for listening, and for developing a can-do climate for teachers and for students?

Do I have high self-efficacy for managing change towards ensuring that quality teaching is the norm of discussion?

How often is teaching the discussion topic in my school?

What do I exclude in order to focus on the important and challenging?

What evaluation models am I constantly promoting to ask the question about whether my school is working toward worthwhile goals?

How successful am I at making parents part of the answer, not the problem, of educational outcomes of my students and teachers?