Implementing, monitoring, adjusting and evaluating the Plan is what gives it life, enabling a district to achieve its goals, realize its vision, and accomplish its mission; therefore, it is critical that there is a high level of collaboration between the district and its schools on all these processes. While it is primarily the role of the school to implement continuous learning cycles at the instructional level, it is primarily the role of the district to support that instruction at the systems level. It is essential that implementation and impact data be collected at both the district and school levels – both instructional and systems - and that data be brought back to the entire continuous improvement team for collective analysis, possible adjustment of implementation/plan, and finally for evaluation. It is also important that the team regularly step back and reflect on not only the success of the plan but of the entire continuous improvement process.
To what extent are those responsible implementing the monitoring activities by the due dates?
Review the six components of the hexagon tool for this strategy. In the areas where the ratings were low, are they moving in a positive direction? In the areas where the ratings were higher, are they staying at a high level?
What does the monitoring data say about fidelity of implementation? What is the evidence?
What does the monitoring data from the interim targets say? How close are you to where you need to be to meet your end target?
What adjustments might need to be made?
What will you communicate regarding the results of the monitoring process? To whom?
What will you communicate regarding adjustments to the plan? To whom?
Adjust the plan based on your answers to the questions above
Communicate monitoring data and adjustments to the plan to stakeholders as is appropriate
Use your data protocol to review monitor data