Basic ideas
Default spatial models make simplifying assumptions about animal distribution and density in relation to landscape
Density is a Poisson process
State space is randomly (e.g., uniformly) utilized
More realistic and interesting models allow for
Non-homogeneous processes for density
Influence of landscape characteristics on utilization of state space (e.g, barriers, more/less attractive habitat features).
Example - Coyote utilization/ density of Savannah River Site in relation to availability of hog carcasses
Basic SCR data for coyotes
Detections of scats on transects located throughout SRS
Scats identified to individual coyote by DNA analysis
Detection and "trap" data discretized to 500-m resolution
Modeling of state space
Needs to reflect entire state space (not just where encounters occurred)
Handled in secr by a habitat maske
Pre- dumping of carcasses (Summer, Fall 2014)
Post- dumping of carcasses (2015-2016; green = dumped, white = removed)
Analysis in SECR
secr.data<-make.capthist(encounters, detectors, fmt = "trapID")
encounters = 500-m resolution scat detections
detectors = 500-m "pixellated" transects
habitat mask
Big enough to enclose SRS boundary
Partitioned into Treatment = 0 (carcasses dumped) and Treatment =1 (carcasses removed).
Spatial tools in R (Packages rgdal and sp required)
Read in shapefile containing treatment attribute
boundary <- readOGR(dsn)
Incorporate covariates into mask
mask.h<-make.mask(traps,buffer=8000,poly=bound)
mask.h<-addCovariates(mask.h,boundary)
Analysis
Pre- and post- treatment comparison of models having and lacking treatment effect
without<-secr.fit(secr.data,mask,detectfn = "HN",binomN=0, method = 'BFGS')
with<-secr.fit(secr.data,model=list(D~Treatment),mask=mask.h,detectfn = "HN",binomN=0, method = 'BFGS',start=fit0)
Results