There is quite a bit of philosophy that both helps us and blinds us to the Bible. Good or bad, the typical modern person vastly underestimates the influence philosophy has had on our current understandings and present being. Bringing out these different areas of thought aids in separating the wheat from the chaff.
This section is arranged in the order a topic becomes relevant in Redeeming Asimov.
There are many references to 'religion' on this page. One definition of religion is a group of philosophies bound together (from Latin religare ‘to bind’) and the ideal applications of those philosophies in the world. In this definition, theology and church dogma as applied to humanity have the same kind of relationship to the world as science and engineering as applied to things.
The actual beliefs, products, and history of a cohesive group give another more widely subscribed definition of religion. This definition is more appropriate to the Culture Links page.
Neither of these definitions shows a line between secular and sacred or natural and supernatural. Both definitions would include political parties, theories of education, and ideological movements such as Communism, Fascism, Capitalism, personality cult, etc. The whole Marxist tree of idealism with its modern species such as Critical Theory, Xi Jinping Thought, Socialist-oriented market economy, and various socialist/communist organizations and nations provides such an obvious set of examples sitting in both definitions of religion. The conspicuous anti-theism of most of these species in the tree makes it unnecessary to even change 'theology' out for another term.
Sir David Attenborough on God - youtube.com - Agnosticism is not neutral and neutrality is not possible. Attenborough eloquently comes down just on the God side of agnosticism.
NOVA: The Bible's Buried Secrets -.pbs.org - Current homepage with transcript. The evidence displayed in this program is overwhelmingly positive and complementary to the Bible, however, the experts pursue other devices thus demonstrating their prejudices.
Original Program Website | Senior Executive Producer's Story | The Foundation of Judaism | Archeology of the Hebrew Bible | Writers of the Bible | Moses and the Exodus | The Palace of David | Origins of the Written Bible | Ask the Experts | Archeological Evidence
Who Wrote the Flood Story? by Richard Elliott Friedman - Dividing up the flood story as a demonstration of the Documentary Hypothesis. Contains the following quote that is easily contradicted by the Tablet Hypothesis as presented in Redeeming Asimov:
One cannot just say that this is the work of clever scholars who divided up the text to come out this way. Just try doing it with any other work of comparable length to the Five Books of Moses. No scholar is clever enough to make all of this come out so consistently.
"A Point of View: Does atheism have to be anti-religious?" by John Gray - bbc.com
Why I Am Now a Christian (2023) by Ayaan Hirsi Ali - thefp.com
"Is Atheism Irrational?" - bigquestionsonline.com - Kelly J. Clark
Differences Between a Psychopath vs Sociopath - psychcentral.com
The Incompatibility of Critical Theory and Christianity MAY 15, 2019 | NEIL SHENVI • PAT SAWYER - thegospelcoalition.org - Helpful overview of Critical Theory and its incompatibility with Christianity.
[W]e should reconsider our use of the phrase “cultural Marxism.” This term is used at times in academic literature to refer to “critical theory” because of the work of a number of 20th-century Marxian theorists who problematize hegemonic power, including Antonio Gramsci, T. W. Adorno, Georg Lukacs, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Terry Eagleton, Jurgen Habermas, and Paulo Freire (the latter two being qualified Marxists). Similarly, the term “cultural Marxism” has been employed by respected public figures like David Brooks and Albert Mohler. However, it also has shown up recently in the manifestos of mass shooters and makes frequent appearances on neo-Nazi websites. Because “critical theory” is the more common scholarly term and has none of the negative associations of “cultural Marxism,” it will convey our intended meaning more effectively.
Retrospectives: Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era by Thomas C. Leonard - princeton.edu - Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 19, Number 4, Fall 2005, Pages 207–224 - Excellent summary highlighting "race suicide" and how eugenics was so attractive to the progressives of the time.
Image Archive on the American Eugenics Movement - eugenicsarchive.org
Eugenic Sterilization Laws - Creation of sterilization laws from Harry Laughlin's model.
"Harry Hamilton Laughlin (1880-1943)" by Rachel Gur-Arie - embryo.asu.edu
Teaching the Difficult Past of Statistics to Improve the Future (2024) by Lee Kennedy-Shaffer - www.tandfonline.com - Much of the development of modern statistics was in service to Eugenics. This paper highlights the case of three famous statisticians: "Francis Galton’s use of conditional probabilities to demonstrate “hereditary talent,” Karl Pearson’s attempt to quantify the intelligence of Jewish immigrant students, and Ronald A. Fisher’s creation of the analysis of variance to de-emphasize environment in human development..."
"The essence of evolution is natural selection; the essence of eugenics is the replacement of 'natural' selection by conscious, premeditated, or artificial selection in the hope of speeding up the evolution of 'desirable' characteristics and the elimination of undesirable ones." (American Advisory Bioethics Comission-Eugenics, retrieved May 15, 2013 from http://www.all.org/abac/eugen02.htm)
For:
The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger (1922) - gutenberg.org - Introduction by H.G. Wells.
Against:
"Lecture 36: Eugenics and Other Evils" by Dale Ahlquist - chesterton.org
Eugenics and Other Evils by G. K. Chesterton - gutenburg.org
Brave New World (1932) by Aldous Huxley
Humanist Manifesto II - Signed by Isaac Asimov among many others.
"The Humanist Manifestos (1933, 1973, 1999)" - First Things March 2000 by J. Budziszewski
THE NON-ELITE: A BRIEF MEDITATION ON THE NATURE OF ATHEIST HUMANISM by R. Joseph Hoffmann, an elitist humanist.
Two Cheers for Capitalism (1978) by Irving Kristol - contemporarythinkers.org - Although capitalism has been extremely successful, the title of this collection is not "three cheers" because capitalism has never sought three cheers. Furthermore there is a negative aspect, capitalism acts as a solvent on culture - breaking apart the ties that bind and turning everything into competition. A religious culture and modest welfare system is needed to bring culture back to meaning and compassion. Thus, Irving Kristol is the father of the Neoconservatives that were so influential in the 90s and 00s in the United States.
The surprising downsides of being clever - bbc.com by David Robson
All The Things #83 MLK vs. BLM || 2/13/2021 - youtube.com - Dr. Aaron Preston: Is Black Lives Matter a natural progression of Martin Luther King's brand of civil rights? MLK's PHD was in philosophy from Boston University. Much of his attractive thinking was Boston Personalism. MLK regarded Marxism as a Christian heresy. Must care for the whole person body and soul.
Personalism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - plato.standord.edu
Jordan Peterson | Full Address and Q&A (2018) | Oxford Union - youtube.com (1:15 hour) - I discovered JP for myself on 9/18/21, three years after the famous critical interview that catapulted his fame. Considering my parallel interests and his fame, I'm surprised it took so long. I haven't yet found anything particularly disagreeable in his thought and quite a bit that is constructively challenging and encouraging. Most of the "controversy" surrounding him seems to be related to how effectively he bats down strawmen arguments that some leftist movements are clearly depending on. In doing so he shows his major concern is to help people at a personal level and battle totalitarianism in all its methods and forms from the bottom up.
Jordan Peterson: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars - The Aspen Institute (2018) - youtube.com (1:32:02)
How dangerous is Jordan B Peterson, the rightwing professor who 'hit a hornets' nest'? (2018) by Dorian Lynskey - theguardian.com - Take out the prejudices, weasel words, and unsupported claims - "But his arguments are riddled with ‘pseudo-facts’ and conspiracy theories" - and this turns into a ringing endorsement. I do agree with the author that any endorsement of Donald Trump, even a tepid one, should be subject to criticism. Given the article's tenor, were Peterson's quotes taken in context?
Jordan Peterson's BEST and MOST MISSED interview about the Channel 4 Cathy Newman Controversy (2019) - youtube.com - With responses to Guardian articles.
Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work" (2018)| British GQ - youtube.com - One of the paradoxes of JP's thought is that it doesn't shrink from contention and therefore can lead to situations that are not necessarily wise to be in. Part of his fame is his success when being critically interviewed by someone who is in the driver's seat of questions and responses - a situation he routinely pulls off. Still, for most people, it would be a foolish endeavor.
"Rational Mysticism and New Testament Christianity" by Henry W. Clark - jstor.org
Let Reason Be Your Guide? A Brief Introduction to Reformed Epistemology. (2001) by Randal Rauser - Leicester: Religious & Theological Students Fellowship, 2001. Pbk. ISBN: 1870137302. pp.51.
A well-put-together book evaluating what Nicholas Wolterstorf, William Alston, and Alvin Plantinga had to say on the subject in major works. While a worthy evaluation of worthy authors, I was expecting to find something more solid in Middle Foundationalism. The Presuppositional approach seems to be much stronger on most accounts. It seems if one took the Presuppositional first and then alongside the Middle Foundational all would be solved. I'm also a little concerned that there was no discussion of answered prayer with the reliability of mystical perception. Answered prayer may not establish general reliability, but it can establish personal reliability.
The mysticism of William Law : a study (1914) by S. Harvey Gem - hathitrust.org
Logical Problem of Evil - iep.utm.edu - Overview of the Problem of Evil as many modern atheists take it - as an objective logical problem. An answer: if death is only evil for the evil and the bland, then POE quickly reduces to the Problem of Pain. The Problem of Pain is by definition subjective - pain is a sensation or feeling, not a thing.
Hermeneutics of Suffering by John J. Parsons - hebrew4christians.com -
Augustine on Evil - str.org - "The evil is momentary. The good that results is eternal."
Genesis 1-11 as Theodicy by James Keifer - elvis.rowan.edu - Genesis 1-11 as a substantial answer to POE.
Jastrow, M.. (1906). A Babylonian Parallel to the Story of Job. Journal of Biblical Literature, 25(2), 135–191. http://doi.org/10.2307/3260156
Lessons on Christian Dogmatics - oodegr.com - Course notes from John Zizioulas. Highlights: A 2. The term: «Dogma» and its significance; B I 3. Cognizance through the Son and Logos; C II 1. The period prior to the Cappadocian Fathers; C II 2. The contribution of the Cappadocian Fathers; C II 5. Existential Interpretation;
John Zizioulas Foundation - zizioulos.org
Volume II - Worship, The Sacraments, Funeral - oca.org
Voddie Baucham: The World, the Flesh, and the Devil (2015) - youtube.com - 58:31 mins - Presentation of the Gospel based in the Reform tradition using the book of Ephesians 2.
Ligonier Ministries - Reformed Theology - ligonier.org - Organization founded by R.C. Sproul.
The Great Debate: Does God Exist? - bellevuechristian.org (audio) - Influential debate between Greg Bahsen and the naive atheist Gordon Stein.
Greg Bahnsen quotes and books - Goodreads.com
Articles on Apologetics and Christian Reconstructionism by Greg Bahnsen - cmfnow.com
A Conflict of Rationalities by Lee Farnsworth - dartmouthapologia.org - Basic summary of presuppositionism, especially pretended neutrality.
Our Theology in Our Apologetics by SCOTT OLIPHINT - faculty.wts.edu (video 8 mins)
"Understanding Cornelius Van Til", K. Scott Oliphint, PhD. - youtube.com (1 hr 21 mins)
“Transcendental Arguments” by John M. Frame - frame-poythress.org - Yes, Van Til can break naturalism towards God, but the move from “intelligible universe” to “theistic universe” requires a traditional argument. The traditional argument is based on a better foundation in this case which alleviates criticisms and thereforeappears self evident.
What is Russell's Paradox? - scientificamerican.com
Russell's Paradox - iep.utm.edu
Russell's Paradox - plato.stanford.edu
"Gödel and the limits of logic" by John W Dawson - plus.maths.org
20TH CENTURY MATHEMATICS - GÖDEL- storyofmathematics.com
Breaking The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - youtube.com - How the LIGO was able to measure gravitational waves by tilting towards one side of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
The Uniqueness of Human Recursive Thinking (2007) BY MICHAEL C. CORBALLIS - americanscientist.org
Existentialism Is a Humanism - marxists.org - Lecture by Jean-Paul Sartre in 1945 that has served as an introduction to the atheistic branch of existentialism. Later he apparently disavowed it. I can't help but think his atheistic existentialism is a recipe for misplaced activism, such as Communism throughout the twentieth century. At any rate, the three families of criticism he wished to demolish seem alive and well, precisely because of his atheism.
David Hume - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009)
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Selections... - David Hume & Adam Smith compilation. (1907)
www.davidhume.org - Hume's work in digital form. Highlights: Hume’s Argument concerning Induction in Treatise 1.3.6; Oxford Lectures on David Hume, 2021-22 by Peter Millican
Veritasium: Is Most Published Research Wrong? - youtube.com
"Lies, Damned Lies and Medical Science" - theatlantic.com - November 2010, Excellent summary of John Ioannidis' work and prospects for the improvement of certainty in science.
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" (2005) by John P. A. Ioannidis - plosmedicine.org - This is the paper that got the ball rolling on the replication crisis, laying out a statistical argument for his hypothesis.
"Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research" (2005) John P. A. Ioannidis - jamanetwork.com - Review of replicated studies with conclusions supporting Ioannidis' hypothesis.
Breaking The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - youtube.com - Manipulating complementary variables such that you get a high uncertainty in one and low in the other.
Everything is f---ed: The syllabus - hardsci.wordpress.com - Sanjay Srivastava creates a fake class syllabus citing the research on why the social sciences are...well, see for yourself.
"What Is Wrong With Social Psychological Science?" - psychologytoday.com - Lee Jussim describes the reasons the social sciences are going through a time of epistemic crisis.
The Most Dangerous Equation (2007) by Henry Wainer | American Scientist - De Moivre's equation provides the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The problem is the lower the sample size the more likely the variation. Without understanding, comparing a small sample to a large one can be like comparing apples to oranges.
A close second is Kelly's equation:
The correlation coefficient that emerges from regression tells us about the strength of the linear relation between the dependent and independent variables. But alas it encourages fallacious attributions of cause and effect. It even encourages fallacious interpretation by those who think they are being careful. ("I may not be able to believe the exact value of the coefficient, but surely I can use its sign to tell whether increasing the variable will increase or decrease the answer.")
From "Central Limit Theorem" A Comprehensive Statistics Cheat Sheet for Data Science Interviews - StrataScratch.com
In Meta-Analyses, Weak Inclusion Standards Lead to Misleading Conclusions. Here’s Proof. (2020) by Robert Slavin and Amanda Neitzel - robertslavinsblog.wordpress.com - The Meta-Analysis is one of the main way research is condensed into something educators can actually use. Unfortunately inclusion of low quality studies can completely derail a Meta-analysis.
How Can You Tell When The Findings of a Meta-Analysis Are Likely to Be Valid? - 5 basic standards.
John Hattie is Wrong - Most meta-analysis contain studies with biases that inflate the effect size. Therefore a meta-meta-analysis that is not selective will merely be aggregating bias and hiding that which is truly effective.
“But It Worked in the Lab!” How Lab Research Misleads Educators
Policymaking Is Not a Science (Yet) - Freakonomics Radio ep. 405 - freakonomics.com - Why do so many promising solutions — in education, medicine, criminal justice, etc. — fail to scale up into great policy?
Flat Earth "Science" -- Wrong, but not Stupid - youtube.com
Naomi Oreskes: Why we should trust scientists - ted.com (transcript) - Outlines a consensus model of science that depends upon "Organized Skepticism."
What Does 'Scientific Consensus' Mean? - forbes.com - Outlines consensus from a field that isn't climate-related.
When to Doubt a Scientific ‘Consensus’ - aei.org - Why climate 'consensus' arguments aren't very convincing to the non-activist public. "There’s an old legal proverb: If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have the law on your side, argue the law. If you have neither, attack the witness."
Archived links in the article: ClimateGate Shows Attempted 'Manipulation' of Peer Review Process;
Simulating Natural Selection - youtube.com
OpenAI Plays Hide and Seek…and Breaks The Game! - youtube.com -
Uncommon Knowledge: Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution with Berlinski, Meyer, and Gelernter - hoover.org - Excellent example of an ID criticism hitting its mark. In general, criticisms coming from ID have been valid, but they are also answerable and over time have largely been answered. The challenge for ID has always been philosophical - it has never really offered much more than a God of the Gaps with a small version of God - which is doomed to failure. In contrast, a strong Logos theology need only point out Darwinism's ultimate presuppositions, clear away claims of neutrality, and otherwise, does not have a strong need to criticize the sciences. After all, in our orderly universe, what standard is there higher than God by which we can judge God?
Uncommon Knowledge with David Berlinski on “The Deniable Darwin” - hoover.org - "Life appears to offer at least a temporary rebuke to the second law of thermodynamics. If the complexity of living creatures is increasing, the entropy that surrounds them is decreasing." For his criticisms, Berlinski is a very interesting agnostic.
Stephen Meyer: God and the Origin of the Universe - Discovery Science - Perhaps ID is moving toward a Logos theology, but Meyer is still heavily reliant on a causality argument which inherently implies a small God.
Sparks Fly Over Intelligent Design (2002) Karl Giberson, Jonathan Wells, Michael Ruse, Michael Behe, William Dembski, Robert Pennock, and Eugenie Scott - genesisproclaimed.org - An exchange elucidating the main triumphs and failings of ID. The upshot is that the criticism of Irreducible Complexity coming from ID is sound, but also answerable. ID is a philosophical/theological stance that does not offer any science of its own. Inevitably ID criticisms will receive answers. This leads to a god of the gaps which makes ID a failure as a philosophy.