by
George M Cummins IV
Tuesday, April 14, 2020
I.
Quantity is a matter of a substance which never cannot deny itself, but can have a
negation of its quality. Quality tells us the attribute and gives to the judgment its
proposition, e. g. a color. Ideas of space, time, motion, (even perishables is a motion,
i. e. locomotion, decay, touch, move of the spiritual atoms through the body we
imagine, i. e. altering in metaphysical mode) which is a clause causing decay of a
material is a notion of solidly and the missed, notion of space, and it has qualities, so
then I’m not sure whether quality is then prior to quantity, or not. By creating this
arrangement I am having now two syllogisms. Negation is easier to set than
affirmation and not only from linguistically nuances. For if I affirm something, then I
am perceiving something, perceiving the perceived, and my reason creates a
universal statement, category, a syllogism of existence concerning of something new.
By negation I just purely state that “that is not there,” so then I am already
aquatinted with the situation from an experience, which is not prior. To create an
absolute thought we need more than two syllogism, for two premises, when it’s by
law of polarity created in correlation, always one or both will be imperfect, as if A is
B, A cannot be A, if C is not A or B and / or B cannot be B true as false if B is not C.
But still it is all even, when we always, when always we are having non-pending—
even level-quality of assumption, the negation gives its negation of possibility of
falsity or if it’s a true statement. It must be an odd amount of qualities about the
quantity-sense. If quality, i. e. space is A and is A, and it must be so, for since quantity
cannot deny itself, and therefore it is a syllogism based upon an odd number of
premises, it is one & also the eternity. Quality must be then naturally posterior, not
prior to quality, for there is always an eternal variety of qualities, and then causes
possible approach to less then odd, and then we are not sure when the even result of
“no” or “yes” is true, for it’s even. Therefore sense and notion of decay is a quality, it’s
a matter underneath the conception of time, which is a quantity also. Therefore we
can assume that one of an absolute thoughts of universal and strict meaning is thus:
We never can create an affirmative (correct) syllogism out from / of two premises,
for such and ‘even’ gives us always one negation which denies, and makes us unsure
of it. Then I can say that the absolute axiom of universal thought, an absolute
syllogism, is when eternity of quantity A is A, for A is then C, where B is its negation.
Unless C is refutation of it all of a negation towards A and B.