Self-ness and What Matters in Self-Reflection and Realization in:
The Pre-Reflective Cogito inside the Self-reflective inventionism of solipsism
George M Cummins IV
February 14 2022
All modern world is asking of what is needed to pursue more of pragmatical, while paradoxically enough, it’s the practical question of life which defeats human’s existence in essence of his identity, and pursuit of something I’d entitle, a “habit of being,” – it’s a pseudo-alienation from yourself by being aware of existence of an object ‘aside yourself,’ when one ‘still-does-not’ realize it’s not an object, but a subject; then it takes its role as an opposition in a form of an irrational and absurd existential thought, which is our relevant revelation of our own consciousness; that in fact, “We are aware that we doubt, so we are alive.”
Major problems in Cartesian Cogito-ideas are dwelling in fact for sacrificing humans to objects, creating a machines from their intellect by stating, “I think, therefore I am.” (R. Descartes) – In case, that in a state of being conscious as of a consciousness of something; the existence of other, its (paradoxically enough, our own) self-realization, – is then a manifestation of ourselves. It’s an object of my self-reflection, which I took under an examination, while seeking the evidence as valued to me, so in such a degree, I let it be grow into my (former) solipsism of “sleeping childhood,” and presently as an awaken conscious being, I am aware of my own doubts about “it.” (Its existence, matters, manners, proportions, contraries, qualities, any type of categories or questions of a feel I hold to it, as of what kind of an apprehension the circumstance held upon me while I conceived it inside myself, when I recognized its ‘being-in-the-world;’ – its influences-- if that’s so, then I am doomed by its overwhelming capacity; but thankfully such an “existence” is only but one. Somehow we can call that an invented or ‘constructed essence of Religion,’ beyond, and simply: Trans-phenomenal Being as itself.)
It’s a pre-reflective cogito, where the purity of physics gives its nature, but steps into a power and stays, figures only as ‘nihil.’
Problem of a free will is a nihilisation of the mentioned “other,” and its extent is determined and unjustified as unreal. For simple reason, the “I” would not exist before, after or any other moment if prevailance of the “otherness” would not measure my “fate of state of affairs” as far as my own seek goes into it and through by degrees of a self-realization of your own self, ourselves.
“Being there,” therefore the existence of inside the pure and only, an “othernesses,” is then a solipsism, where I deny my obligatory items, and I seek, such “I” am a part only, (when I own my own pre-reflective cogito already; as to the: “being conscious of other-ness, and its existence aside me) and it gives me a force, – anxiety, under the an instrumentalization of moods, to prevail myself on my own, while and during a unique ‘being-trown-in-the-world,’ (called perhaps an operation of ‘coping’), when I apply the “pragmatic purity” into the otherness, of my self-reflective cogito. But only in case I doubt in continuity. In an awareness of the inevitable presence. – A loghical paradox, for it’s actually the pre-reflective cogito of yourself.
In orders of a mentioned “nihilitation,” we observe that the principle of Heideggerian anxiety, &c., (as one from the forces & more alike) and simply in general, “the other,” is then “nothingness,” for you yourself nihilate the “otherness,” for sake of pursing or attempting the inner self of the sudo-original and primordial “I.”