click on the Google "lined 'Android-like' button" in order to unbox the menu of so far available articles (in occasional cell-phone & not desktop-like viewing pages)
Therefore style could be positively be considered as secondary in opposition with an idea, for which the particular form of expression stands. This also is a first factor when I can have a free open way of stimulation for my own voice: say what I can, in any case, continuously, as if I were about to not be able to express myself later on, but always had to plan ahead a new "idea", plot, summary, notion, thought, observance-- and rest is just a matter of 'length' and flexibility of reader's understanding.
Inspiration is a "Writer's Diary" of Fyodor Dostoevsky's, for its impression it leaves upon me in all possible attributes, direction, options is only more than encouraging in my own work. For it proves possibility to express myself "NOW", same as "then", therefore 'correct' & 'move forward' & improve, then...
That all is a purpose. The idea is then --or ideas-- completely independent now from the way it's written or said, and mood of writing loses its importance. It gives the common odor of a vaporized play in an ether, where you give then stand only, and only for an idea, and the form of expression is being evaluated in more mystical sense, somewhat easy to approach, but not at the same time, for suddenly whatever is being produced, it is a "beseda" with a listener / reader. Even if I use phrase "as a matter of fact", "somewhat", or "certain", it all dwells in my new form: Any kind of idealized (inspired prose or work of whatever source) is conceived in mind, is self-alone brilliance, but while put on a paper in any form, becomes dishonest. Same as behavior of man, where we never are sure of its origin.
My technique is to keep my "run-on" sentences, but making a structural ideas in a shorter & organized way. Straight to the point, but with a feel of mood which reminds a newspaper language --in a certain, 'certain' measure!--, descriptive, if something it has from a "newspaper language” at all; basically having on mind an order of keeping thoughts alive by misleading judgment that is being analyzed in the narration, no matter if it's a story, or a critical analysis. By the active proportions is being given a development of something independent of the author, and creates then an independent voice out off of him, and off of the reader, so he can decide, as if I were building a house, perfect ford for instance, but upon window and door I would forget.
This is a Manifesto #1 in brief on my future work in my inquiry. Just a thought I just had, and perhaps will keep for its developing and changing by degrees for the sake of principle's the perfection which it caries.
I'm beginning to form my new way of expression. I always wish to "express myself", and in the same idea keep simultaneously the notion of mood, or keep order in the mood in the formatted letter, essay, or any type of a text, but with a big failure. I am realizing one thing how to put my vocabulary and its usage in order for the desired purpose, which both of those factors are growing and maturing, in both polar senses.
Prior Analytics -- Aristotle No 1a
HegelAComparativeStudy (A Summary)
Beg. of a Transcendental Phenomenology (part One from 3 as possibly was planned)
More to add, as is in contunity; progressively:
Phenomenalism(Sartre, existentalism -- No2, PartB)
3/4/2022:
Friedrich Nietzsche (Personality, and overall)
Ezra Pound_Cantos' Article (& additions), more later
3/11/022:
Hegel_Article#2b_an_'archetypalHero' (an outline)
3/18/2022:
since last the time being, by the "morning," additions of / from 'recaptured," as all's in continuity in development of my website, and such regulars, to more the alterly-times:
"Flipping the coin" -- Hegel No3 (elucidation#3a)
Investigation of an Inventive Soul-Hegel (ca#4b) -- [Samely, to the ideas of Self-awareness-topics in the not only German national enlightenment-transphenomenalism, as well; as to J. Gottlieb Fichte, R. W. Emerson, in parts, too as elucidated.]
4/15/2022:
L. Klima_Adburditism -- Irrationalism; Nietzsche (CZ) 20eth century
-----
The right & proper correction, same as to the grammar, the appropriate time, as if all allows.
*
On a defense for sense & sensibility:
Particular & Universal Deductions
– example no 1a/
4/18/2022
If proposition (‘belonging’ – in variability, and in general meant, a concept by itself), is possibly suddenly --“given,” -- & remains affirmative, and possibility under law of comprehensive universality, & then the major “Categorical Imperative,”… (-- Concerning the essence of will as an eternal maxim of your obligation for life-matter, to the “given possibility, as ‘chances allow.’ “ -- Not only an allusion towards I. Kant presently, I mean, but, in general), …is negative, then all possible deductions are not realizable to put forth. (Existence, or even a simple statement, &c.)
If one proposition is universal and the other particular in a proposed syllogism; & then when both are affirmative; or, when the universal is negative, such the particular available is negative. -- The affirmative is universal. It cannot be there any “opposite;” for: That’s a definition of an absurdism & irrationalism a la Reductio ad impossible, simply. Indefinite or particular; no deduction will be possible in those cases.
If the affirmative is necessary – it is in the Universals, and always: A possible negative is such as inferred, not oddly in a sense of syllogism, and logic overall; but: Rule is that the law is then when no mankind can possibly rule for themselves, but God, because inner perplexity within yourself manifests confusion out from a touch-point with the Universals, so then we are naturally depersonalized, dissociated, and no stable point remains, for we leave alone one sane intellect and mind off from the plurality, then only the God is available for pursuits; otherwise who denies “All for sake of his own pleasure or engagements with self-absorption,” &c., seeks himself only, and fails in delusion of his own trap by being intwined into a game of its own principle(s).
Sunday, 12th of May, 2024:
This is a beautiful passage from an encyclopedias forum, which I edited and wrote about to a huge degree, it is kind of self-explanatory, too. It's good to add that monads are geometrical points and cannot move. (About that later.)
But, I was wondering if they are smaller than light? -- a ray? Electromagnetic Spectrum. (Does not need any medium for travel, which is a cluster.)
Cluster is the dense medium for light to travel in through. -- Perhaps the "spiritual atom of existence in the universe," is even then smaller; -- (there exists speculatively “composites” and same as opposed to e.g. a “simple ideas”) gives the possibility to the “two clock-facing each other-theory,” that it reaching its perfection in creation of a "thing," an organ or a stone, agreeable in proportion, &c., the God's Universe. -- Intellect is "spiritual," one way also form of matter. A Monad. Cluster = Aether.
Viz:
"The Two Clocks Relation is a hypothetical teleological instance used to support theories of quintessential matter and natural harmony in the Universe.
It is most frequently used to explicate Gottfried Leibniz's theory of monadic existence, a pseudo-spiritualistic position that asserts that there is no difference between the intellect and matter, because everything that is perceived by people as matter is in fact consistent of spiritual quanta called "monads" (and, during Leibniz's time, "intellect" was considered by most to be purely spiritual). Monads, Leibniz said, do not have any physical properties, and do not interact with each other dimensionally, and that people perceive material interaction because the monads that they consist of are harmonized with the monads of other materials so as to produce the understanding of interaction. The only way Leibniz could maintain these far-fetched claims was by legitimizing the harmony of the monads that make everything in the Universe up. Nowadays, Leibniz's method of doing so is explicated with the "Two Clocks Relation".
Leibniz's legitimization was very simple: He claimed that because all existents in the Universe were produced immediately by God that they are all essentially identical expressions, and that they therefore all have precisely the same properties. The only differentiation in that which is perceived to be matter is how and when the monads exist in relation to each other, i.e. whether a cluster of monads forms, by coincidence, a person or a stone. Leibniz certified, however, that regardless of what those monads form, they should maintain their individuality forever, such that each monad, regardless of its state or position, should change only in concordance to every other existent monad. This legitimization is characterized as a "Two Clocks Relation" because it is approximately congruous to the observable concordance of two perfect timepieces that are set at the same time; for as long as they remain perfect (as the monads are, as nonreactive products of God), they should forever be in harmony, acting together without aberration."
I'll also would love to add some news about me, yes, I love G. W. Leibniz; B. Russel is great with explaining it, L. is one of two inventors of calculus; (I. Newton simultaneously, although they did not know of each other of doing so, invented it), when even modern physics "almost agrees" with him... It's astonishing, his monadology, ...such a monad, is not even having any dimension, so it cannot move. ...Just “exists.,” I suppose, so it's 'smaller' (no size) then, smaller than light. -- It’s spiritual, as regards to the God’s creation. To that I can apply & compare to Foucault's pendulum – it’s a notion, where when exists, same as the simple invention of the "clock." -- Regular timer, as to tool to imagine the notion. -- Foucault's pendulum proves the rotation of the Earth because of an existence a stable point, (it is the middle of the fluctuation of the pendulum), that is a geometrical point in the Universe, which can be “anywhere as thought,” so – such monad is the basic from which “form,” a concept in philosophy is based, created as well.
---
A small text on Joyce's Finnegans Wake, a first part:
Introduction
I promised a systematic form after all for this project. It came to pass for its sharpening. As for the first attempt, first composed text, first half of the "Preamble" came to life, but, unfortunately does not contain the main explanation and supporting arguments and statements, so much so needed. For now, I do my best upon depicting clarity and decent form of the texts’ sake as it will be published; grammar correctness, and omitting mistakes. Nowadays I should be more frequent "blogger, and hopefully will express something of a meaning in a new air.
English, untrained well, figuring as a second language is still under progress.
Well, also, the part of promised as the "strawberries": sit still in my handwritten form. It's waiting for 3 more books to study and annotate, but will be used parts of it later on as a post itself, collected and labeled for its sake of understanding and development which resonates with mine.
Now I am simultaneously adding few new works instead of taking care of correcting the mentioned mistakes. Present work will dwell upon my rendering of Rilke's Duino Elegies into the Czech Language.
By 3/11/2022:
All reconstruction progresses in continuity since last ca 8 days. ~ GMC IV.
step/update(s): II. - III.
At the time of ca around June –since June the 16teenth is upcoming, I am to be proving my craft on inquiries upon Ulysses, &c. of J. Joyce as well-- I began to study L.Klíma vehemently, while considering rendering the major treatise of his, The World as Conscientiousness and Nothing into English language, which not only most likely really was never accomplished in its entirety, so since I undertake this tasks of "think & doing," (Task of self-established Method) I simultaneously started to read, finished, now re-reading his major " 'Self-expression' Autobiography," -- Mea, from Latin "Mea Culpa,” for "My Fault," a moral justification for his life, his philosophic notes, thus gaining the status quo in order to gain the purposeful material for the undertaken task with the major; The very translation of the 200 pages tractate, while the Autobiography's length is ca 1,000 pages in Czech, German, Latin, Greek and sometimes even French. My accomplishment is to cover the resources from original Czech l., and translate in perchance even nonprofitable way (maybe for no profit in Qs of maters of material feedback, as my principles sometimes go, will see) into English Language.--June 12/2021
Transphenonenalism; and existential ontology, an Introduction was laid into a new Project yesterday; by steps, since yesterday, I'm opening it, while all based not only ideologically upon J. J. Rousseau, L. Klíma, F. Nietzsche, D. Hume, Husserl, M. Heidegger, J. Derrida, and Heidegger, including absurdity of S. Beckett -- so well analyzed by the Qs of "Identity," and "Alienation," via my INTRODUCTION (viz the link underneath) -- as to more to be found the latter, in continuity. Sartre and Hegel, M. Foucalt, and Idea of Isolation was placed in orders, same as more. [2/15/2022, New Orleans] -- see: Introduction into Phenomenalism No2a
Motives from transcendental phenomenology, as to the Husserl (as always, viz the expanding menu on the left with the articles; site map comes soon, too) of last year submission-- and also my own “Sartre’s innovation” was included, if not here, will be then soon; while the “forth much fruit” comes to live again, perhaps. --My present occupation with piano practice and music inquiry, studying Mathematics and English consumed large amount of my “free time,” to be more than honest. Not even commence the fact of all the “mundane” in life.(…)
/7/25/2021 Added few subpages gradually presently, pending, a samples and remnants from my posts for school-orders from a recent past not long ago; slightly edited before publishing, while capturing an idea of replacing content of the site under a different domain for some so & so, a particular reasons. Will see of what differs by degrees, if all allows.
Much more of a proper formatting, same as the corrections of English are the upcoming; as promised.
~author
*
--more intro to come since an innovation of the sites began--
Ideas and comments shall be appreciated, but I prove by my time and possibilities that my articles will grow faster, and with a more & better-corrected form. Old ones will be corrected gradually in any case.
~author
*
"This reminds me of the ludicrous account he gave Mr. Langton, of the despicable state of a young gentleman of good family. "Sir, when I heard of him last, he was running about town shooting cats." And then in a sort of kindly reverie, he bethought himself of his own favorite cat, and said, 'But Hodge shan't be shot: no, no, Hodge shall not be shot.' "
~V. Nabokov, Pale Fire
It was a world of Zembla, where the curtain, under the shadow of dreamer’s consciousness, covers all the living. The dream is becoming truth through the dreamer's awaking into a long-short sleep, and the book he is reading is becoming his omnipotent fantasy, where who is dreaming, gives life and keeps alive the contents, plot, heroes, motives, emotions, passions, love, hate, ideas, lives, where this is a very measure aesthetic happiness.
Sunday, 12th of May, 2024:
A brief Overview
The world is my representation, and the world is my (same way all-throughout), my will. Because of conscious reflection of ‘vernunft’ (reasoning), only human then can bring it to his understanding, for: 1) A) Representation is is determined by causality in indefinite B) space and force of in the change (time) in human consciousness. Such is one major 2) & only category we all are uniting existence of thing itself which never can be fully understood. We do not know the idea itself, which is the pure will which forms the presentation, but we feel it by an acceptance, already by its development in the time and space (matter then is presupposed by the subject), as an intuitive conditions for imagination of the matter itself, infinite experience1.
Only the only subject knows an object, not opposite, and he is never to be completely comprehended by an object.
Intuitive and abstract in knowing (or recognizing of the acceptance) as representation and the inner idea, an abstracted view. The fact that time and space is independent upon matter, which cannot exist without the subject carrying the causal condition of its comprehension as regards to the matter, proves that time and space are inevitably necessary for the creation of a concept; the ideal-matter, the Idea, which is subjective.
Time and space gives each other meaning, causality unites the space and time. Change (space) and permanence in duration, figuring as time; when, knowledge cannot bring causality itself.
Development by considering via 'objectification of the will' as a result in the representation (intuitive reflection, searching for absolute essence of the framed Idea) of reality & its later manifestation upon us. It can be seen perhaps causality then, as the only category, because of its absolute necessity as a law in plurality. (Ockham's Razor principle2.) - Schopenhauer can be fascinating, in his outlook is just about everywhere; applied as an universal algorithm upon what of putting Ideas into such a simple, elegant and just beautiful system of world seemed as one way, Representation, and the other, pure Will.
Second aspect of the world as Will, is will to live, an unattainable mere deception of possibility to be recognizer, but also never-to be comprehended fully, the essence and absolute framed nature of the thing-in-itself, the idea, which is unattainable, therefore it's the question of absolute acceptance of the natural deception of Nature itself.
(Man is created to be continuously pulsed and innerly perplexed, by this question, which makes him not only a philosopher, but also his character is fulfilled as he is.)
1Only the infinite untimeliness of the presented material of the experience is the cause of never-to-be understood essence of the will. -- Otherwise we were alike to “gods’ qualities.”
2Plurality is possible and based upon a principle of an absolute necessity; so, then according to that and only that we can presuppose the less of the most of the closest material is needed over all and everything in causal order of creation of a judgment.
Last updated: /04/20/2022 © George M Cummins IV