L. Klima: World as a Consciousness and Nothing
All conceptions, same as the world’s impressions are conceived in one’s own mind. Conceptions came to life when I got to use to be the world which is me myself, who created it; and the impression of it I have is my action, my game; game is transvaluating values of the immediate presence, reaching the next level and overcoming the principle of pinnacle of my own self while dealing with practical. For all practical is non-essential for practicing self-improvement --paradoxically-- but immanent for presence, so it cannot be excluded from life, it’s the inevitable burdenly part of life. My own existence is a condition for existence of something and without me the life would not exist. If my consciousness dies, the impressions of conceptions, for those are an impostory images of the real, “presentates,” and representates of an instances of qualities, “its subtract,” its replacement, and those will gain another form in a consciousness of someone else, and the world as I know it, for my presence influenced the “outer” as I live, then will not continuously be active in the exchange of primal existential base, which is causality. If something will happen in me, it finds itself the never-endingly misplaced replacement in mind of someone else, and the opposite way. How to reach the level of Egosolipsism, leads to elevate oneself into level of “Deoessence,” where the “glory of oneself” is a leading perspective and forming, forcing power to create the transvaluations, creativity by thinking and by practical orders: a self-realization in the world.
Method of the “game,” -- transvaluating of all values dwells in question in metalogicism; it’s a philosophy which denies philosophy and its existence on top of all; for 1) If all the “skeptical outlook” upon framework of the mentioned “images,” of the “representae” of a the “real,” (which is one huge ghosts of reality, for we, our minds are the birth of it all) of which is are to A) Not only doubt, but not pay attention to and neglect, for it’s mirroring the influence of the “outer world” upon it instead of developing your own vision of B) thinking (prime substantium), all this is but a sample of the practical, therefore a C) Practical reasoning in practicing philosophy-system in needed to be exposed. 2) Metalogicism is realizing that once what A) was true, is not, while the “not” is not true neither, as it is in the principle of the Eternal Reoccurrence of F. Nietzsche, where I am returning back leading to the “Yea,” and “Nay” at once, for B) Someone can deny, same if not denies, and decides otherwise, the results are simply unattainable and come out the “same.” Sign of the fact that human is the confusion before the overman comes; for he’s unable to even frame the meaning into the action, but purely by ‘less intelligible words’ for few.
Notes(1a) for clarifying COGITATA #1, &c.
--Explain “skepticism” (D. Hume), and expl. Nietzsche’s E. Reoccurrence,
Format conceptions, text overall;
This irrational idealistic subjectivism taught us about solipsism, led towards egosolipsism by which crossed upon the World with thought of Deoessence. Then there all “turns about me myself” as a “measuring rod for all,” and makes me the creator of being, which is me myself. Therefore, egosolipsism is suddenly an egosolism, where the chaos of the conceptions of the mentioned “intelligibility” is a manifestation of nihilism and turmoil while being thrown of my own being into pluralism; the awkward practicality in practical philosophy.