Some ideas for different ways to represent and present meter data with the aim of supporting institutional sustainability initiatives. Broadly speaking we are looking and how to combine quantitative measures of energy use with measures of real world action in support of the initiative.
Setting targets is difficult. Should they be given to groups by some external body, or should they be derived internally. How can targets be compared? How can they be represented.
To get things rolling on our own visualisations we will assume the aim of each groups it to meet the energy reduction targets set out in the carbon management strategy:
We can then use a formula to calculate how this saving can be achieved month by month when spread evenly over the time leading up to each target deadline.
This screen shots below (please click images to see larger version) describes a prototype interface to help individuals in organisations act to reduce their electricity use. It brings together a visualisation of energy use with freely available collaboration tools into a simple interface.
The dials for comparing
Brilliant example here at domestic national UK level: http://www.alertme.com/community/resources/energymap
Something similar for Universities/departments/offices. (Which can be contrasted with an ecotricity graphic that doesn't do much for the individual.
High - Medium - Low etc
e.g. in receptions
Better than x, worse than y, same as z.
e.g. on FB feeds, emails, receptions.
This data and bar graph shows what could be done with a 2 steps forward, one step backwards analogy. This would be a very quick way to see how different groups compare with each other i.e. wrt a monthly target.
Cars off the road, equivalent of UK household, hot air balloons full of CO2, meals equivalent,
Show relation of individual consumption actions in relation to a more global statistic e.g. energy consumed by a computer compared with a power station
Again along the the lines of energy reduction as a process there could be a class of visualisation that is designed for a big push - a time when an organisation makes a big effort to reduce its consumption for a short time e.g. Climate Week. This would the occupy an emotional space in terms of baselining and defining when alerts are left on.
With comparable organisations plotted together. Best when there are interesting shapes e.g. a spike at midnight.
Along the lines of these:
i.e. make a physical or situated representation of data, especially when the effort is shared and agreed by a group (as in the great example from a street in Brighton).
Turkle-esque emotional attachment to animals and tools. An animal calibrated to get frantic during the day when electricity is being consumed, to get overly tired, to have fits if too high above a target. In the evening, if baseloads don't drop sufficiently the animal don't get a good night sleep. Importantly (maybe) when things are off, the animal that embodies all the tools is not off, just relaxing i.e. fully alive still. Need to read Sherry Turkle's new book! Take a look at http://gickr.com/ to see if it can be used to animate this kind of representation (based on an energy feed).
Note: apparently miserable animals are not motivating!
The better the data the nicer the city looks online. (emotional attachment to property/ physics space).
Taking ideas from this video - the city should grow and decline as a measure of cooperative activity: http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_on_the_moral_mind.html
(and people should be able to punish others for non-cooperation).
Athletes representing different types of entities (houses, businesses, people) race around a track according to their environmental performance.
There are leagues, real medals and the races can be set at any time e.g. to coincide with marketing pushes from for instance 10:10 and climate week.
Obvious link with the Olympics to be held in London during 2012.
A website, with tailored URL, with a statistic, a range of graphics with different views onto the same entity, and a way to push people identities onto it e.g. from facebook. The page also has actions, and people can endorse them, and get into groups to perform the actions together. The actions then change the graphics, in an entirely transparent way, and people can see the knock on effect of the action in a news feed etc.
In other words on one page:
This graphic about the AV vote made me wonder if we might be in danger of making visualisations that are too scientific and neutral e.g. polite hypotheses. It is after all perfectly fine to provoke if you assume your audience is adult.
Create models relating to sharing, jevons paradox, sugarscape and generate data. Show non-linear dynamics and interrelatedness. Get people testing their world-views about bigger topics e.g. growth. Could also do business models such as ecotricity approach vs greenwash approaches.
See the reading list page for reference to Odom et al paper and attachment 1 below.
Pick some culturally significant statistics and graphics and use their form and presentation approach e.g. GDP, tube map, boat race league tables, cricket worm, footy scores etc. (Like a saprophyte).
As the Guardian data blog and McCandles remind us - data visualisations should tell a story. The 10:10 campaign visualisation of stories on a map (RSS feeds + GIS) is interesting because it allows people to see local news on a theme directly related to action. All that is needed for this is OxPoints + OxItems in Oxford.