9/11 Hoax
The missing links of 11th September 2001
For those making their first foray into the mass of 9/11 info and disinfo, here is a recent video by John Lear, of Lear Jets who explains that there were no planes on 9/11.
The term "no planes" means no commercial airliners, no dead passengers, and no hijackers.
This also is confirmed by the fact that not one recognisable aircraft part was recovered from any of the four purported jets.
16 jet engines disappear into thin air - who would ever believe that?
This is the best presented explanation of what did and didn't happen on 9/11 that I have come across in nineteen years of research.
It provides complete confirmation that the late Gerard Holmgren was correct when he stated that there were no commercial passenger jets involved in any of the four 9/11 incidents.
"Physically impossible"
Hitler boasted about the power of his "Big Lie" Theory.
His thesis was that while most people tell small lies, the idea of telling a massive lie is unthinkable and therefore the average person can't imagine anyone else doing it.
Therefore, Hitler posited that telling Big Lies, the more outrageous the better is not only effective,
it's practically fool proof.
Keep this in mind as you reflect on the content of this video.
Who actually saw the planes hits the Twin Towers and what did they actually see?
The fact is all the video of the event is suspect at best. We see jetliners that structurally are nothing more than aluminium tubes slice through thick steel girders like butter. We see wings that should have sheared off beyond a shadow of a doubt penetrate the building.
Experienced pilots have come out again and again and said the feats performed by the "Al Qaeda Hijackers" were beyond the ability of any pilots let alone amateurs who'd never flown aircraft like that before.
This video is a collection of pieces that address the "planes" and it starts off with comments from John Lear, the one of the inventors of the Lear Jet who at the time of this recording was 65 years old and had over 19,000 of flight time over 40 years with over 100 different kinds of aircraft.
The government's conspiracy theory states that nineteen Arab's took hostage hundreds of passengers on four jet airliners, and flew two of those airliners into The World Trade Center's Twin Towers, one into the Pentagon, and one into a field in Pennsylvania.
Facts
According to the Bureau of Transport Statistics, two of the planes involved did not take off.
There is no entry in the take-off records for the relevant airfields.
None of the reported passengers were Arabic,
even though no official passenger lists were ever produced.
The video shown on TV of a plane crashing into a Tower has been demonstrated to be fake.
The witnesses who say they saw a plane on TV have been proven to be actors.
There has never been any explanation by anyone as to why the third building WTC7 collapsed.
There is a video showing the owner telling workers to "Pull it", a term for demolishing the building.
Not one identifiable part of any of the four aircraft was ever recovered.
Sixteen huge jet engines disappeared on the same day.
Hundreds of engineers agree that it is impossible for a World Trade Centre building to collapse from a jet-fuel fire.
They also say that a collapse into its own footprint in ten seconds can only be achieved by intentional demolition.
9/11 was one of the most disgusting acts ever committed by a government on its own people.
Some of the information that somehow remained hidden and unreported will probably be lost in time, but here are some of the most glaring examples of the government shooting itself in the foot.
I know the following is true, because I was involved in the investigation with Gerard Holmgren.
Flight Records
The government's own official airline records kept by BTS (Bureau of Transport Statistics) showed that two of the planes supposedly in the '9/11' story did not actually fly at all that day - in fact one of them was not even scheduled to fly.
You might say "Unbelievable", but read through the following, and discover to what extent important officially-recorded factual information has been kept hidden from you by a useless press that certainly has been aware of these facts for at least five years.
To do a thorough study of all aspects of 9/11 takes hundreds of hours, so below is a distillation of those hours.
Once you have become acquainted with the true motives of the perpetrators, it becomes much easier to cut through the huge amounts of disinformation.
Suffice it to say that the people behind 9/11 are not the non-existent Al Qaeda, not 19 Arabs, and not people usually resident in the Middle East.
Gaining a full understanding of these aspects is one huge piece in the whole conspiracy jigsaw.
There are not hundreds of conspiracies. There is just one, and it is so huge that it is unbelievable.
Here is absolute proof of the government's complicity.
What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001
submitted by Gerard Holmgren
The flights alleged to have hit the Nth WTC tower and the Pentagon did not exist.
They were not scheduled to fly that day.
What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11 2001
This material may be freely reproduced without permission providing that it is not for commercial purposes. Please include the author's name, the URL where you found it and the copyright notice.
On the basis of photographic and physical evidence,it has now been established for some time that on Sept 11, 2001 the damage to the Pentagon was caused by something other than the hijacked Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77 claimed by the government to have crashed into the building.
More recently, its become widely accepted on the basis of video evidence that the object which hit the North Tower of the WTC at 8.46 that morning was not the hijacked Boeing 767, American Airlines Flight 11, as claimed in the official story.
In response to these observations, both supporters of the truth and blind deniers of it agree on one thing.
It raises the question - "If these flights did not hit the buildings as alleged, then where did they go?'
We are now in a position to answer that question.
First lets recap on the official story of what happened to four planes that morning.
AA 11 left Boston for LA at about 8 am, was reported as hijacked about 8.25, and hit the Nth Tower at about 8.46.
UA 175 left Boston for LA at about the same time, was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Sth Tower at about 9.03
AA 77 left Dulles for LA about the same time , was reported hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Pentagon at about 9.45
UA 93 left Newark for SF at about the same time, was reported hijacked about 9.45 and crashed in PA at about 10.10.
The Bureau of transportation website contains search pages, where one can pull up detailed statistics about the history of which flights have been scheduled for which airports on any given day.
Go to http://www.bts.gov/ntda/oai/index.shtml
and click on "detailed statistics" where one can search records of scheduled and actual departure times,
arrival times, diversions and cancellations by departure airport, arrival airport, airline and flight number.
Searches for Sept 11 2001 reveal that the flights AA 11 and AA 77 did not exist.
They were not scheduled that day.
Here are the search results which I encourage everyone to check for themselves.
A search for UA flights from Newark on Sept 11, 2001 shows 0093 to SF was scheduled at 8.00 and actually departed at 8.01.
It is listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.
A search for UA from Boston on that day shows 0175 to LA was scheduled for 8.00
and actually departed at 7.58. Also listed as "diverted" and did not arrive at its destination.
The term "diverted" does not specify any differentiation between legally diverted, hijacked or crashed, so the data gives no indication one way or the other as to truth of the official story about what happened to them, but it does confirm that they departed as per the official story and did not arrive at their destinations.
A search for AA flights from Boston that day does not list 0011.
The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA that day was 0181 at 11.00
A search for AA flights from Dulles that day does not list 0077.
The earliest scheduled AA flight to LA was 0135 at 11.15.
Here's a different search method.
By returning to the search page URL listed earlier, and clicking on "summary statistics ", one can find the historical reliability and punctuality of specific flights over a period of time, by specifying the airline and flight number and defining the time period.
The search then returns figures on average delays in departure and arrival times and percentages of cancelled or diverted flights.
If one searches specifically for UA 175 or UA 93 narrowed down to sept 11 only, the search returns the result of "diverted" for each flight.
A similar search for either AA 11 or AA 77 on that date returns "no data found".
If you search for AA 11 or AA 77 on different days, you will find that they were regularly scheduled flights right up to Sept 10.
AA 11 was scheduled daily from Logan to LA at 8.00, and AA 77 from Dulles to LA at 7.45. On Sept 11, they were not scheduled. Not cancelled. Just not scheduled.
On Sept 12, they re-appear in the schedule (obviously as cancelled for the next few days) up until Sept 20 when both flights change their numbers.
Thus the official figures from the Bureau of Transportation statistics indicate that neither AA 11 nor AA 77 flew on Sept, 11 2001.
This solves the question of what happened to them. Nothing.
Because the flights did not exist.
This is consistent with other evidence which shows that they were not the objects responsible for the Pentagon and Nth WTC tower incidents.
This still leaves unanswered the question of what happened to the passengers alleged to be aboard the non-existent flights.
In the case of AA 77, while one can always speculate about the most plausible scenarios, I prefer to wait until some real evidence emerges.
However in the case of AA 11, I think it is worth noting that UA 175 left from the same airport, at the same time for the same destination as that normally applicable to AA 11.
Therefore, although there is no direct evidence to support the claim, it would seem reasonable to speculate at this stage that any passengers who were regular fliers on AA 11, and asked to booked on it that day, went to the airport, expecting to get on AA 11, as per the normal routine.
They were then told that there was a last minute problem with the flight which could not be fixed within a reasonable period of time, and were offered a flight on UA 175 as compensation.
The data in this search indicates that we have been systematically lied to about the alleged flight paths and hijacking sequence of AA 11 and AA 77, as well as the alleged phone calls made from the planes.
It also indicates probable complicity by American Airlines in the events of Sept 11 , 2001.
For the benefit of any NWO operatives reading this, just in case you're thinking of trying to pressure the Bureau into playing hanky panky with the records, the search results pages have already been backed up and widely distributed.
Nevertheless, I do encourage all readers to do the searches themselves and back up the results pages, just in case this happens.
------------------------------------------
An Interview with Gerard Holmgren
by David West, June 27, 2005
DW: Hello Gerard, thank you for agreeing to an email interview.
I know that many people, including myself, have read much information and disinformation about the aircraft/no-aircraft used on 11th September 2001, and it is quite confusing.
You appear to have a clear-cut picture, and are prepared to debate your opinion, so it is very kind of you to provide answers to some simple questions.
Q1. — Is it true that the official account of events on 11th September 2001 claims that four planes crashed, one into the North Tower of the World Trade Centre, one into the South Tower, one into the Pentagon, and one into a field in Pennsylvania?
Yes.
North Tower
Q2. — What was the flight number of the plane which reportedly hit the North Tower?
American Airlines Flight 11 from Logan to LA.
Q3. — What did you discover about flight AA11 regarding which aeroplane was used, and what happened to it? Please give references to your source material.
According to official flight logs, no such flight existed on Sept 11, 2001.
The Bureau of Transportation logs every domestic flight ever scheduled from a US airport, conducted by a carrier accounting for more than 1% of domestic air traffic. All scheduled flights, whether actually completed or not must by law be reported to this database, unless the flight is cancelled more than 7 days prior to the departure date.
No such flight appears in the records.
Therefore there are three possibilities.
1. No such flight was ever scheduled
2. Such a flight was scheduled but was cancelled more than 7 days prior to the departure date.
3. If such a flight was scheduled and not cancelled more than 7 days prior, then the database has been illegally manipulated or tampered with in some way, which of course raises new questions.
In summary, the situation is that *according to official records* no such flight ever took place.
It should be noted that after this information was discovered and published as an article, the BT almost immediately shut down its data base, and when it put it back up it had moved it to a different URL without leaving a forwarding address at the old URL (the one which was given in the published article), strongly indicating consciousness of guilt. Ten months later they doctored the database to try to include the flights, although the doctored data, while now claiming that the flight was scheduled, still has it as never departing.
Thus all the evidence points to options 1 or 2, although option 3 is still a theoretical possibility.
Q4. — Has any aircraft wreckage, or black box been found at the purported crash site?
Nothing which can be identified as from an aircraft.
Q5. — Are there any official records of passengers boarding the flight?
If so, they have never been released. However, many media outlets did publish lists which purported to be official lists, but which were proven on close examination to be fabrications.
So while one can never 100% rule out the theoretical possibility that the flight existed and the theoretical possibility that somewhere there are official passenger lists, the fact that the media published fake lists and passed them off as official, leads any reasonable person to the conclusion that no such official lists exist.
Q6. — Are any recorded passengers known to be missing, or have had death certificates issued?
To my knowledge there is no official documentation, but it's certainly possible that such documentation exists. Through local enquiries I have confirmed from personal contacts that at least one person listed by the media as being on that flight is definitely missing and that his family believes that he was on the flight.
While I have seen little to prove the missing/dead status of those allegedly on the flight, I have also seen nothing to disprove it. There is a hole in that area of my knowledge of the subject.
Q7. — Is there any video or other evidence that a commercial passenger airliner hit the north tower?
No. the video shows clearly that the object was not a large passenger jet, nor a conventional plane of any type.
Exactly what it is, is difficult to tell but it appears to be some kind of highly advanced secret technology.
South Tower
Q8. — What was the flight number of the plane allegedly involved here?
United Airlines 175 from Logan to LA.
Q9. — What was the tail number of the plane allocated to that flight?
N612UA. The BTS flight logs record the tail number.
Q10. — What is the status of that registered plane today?
Valid, according to the FAA aircraft registry. Search the registry at http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm
(Note: This link has been closed, and the relevant pages have been removed from The Wayback Machine archives. No data is available in today's searches, as predicted by Gerard in this article.
I have been unable to locate anyone with an archive - but I did see and study the pages, many computers ago.)
Q11. — So your research indicates that aeroplane N612UA, which was allocated to flight UA175, which is purported to have hit the South Tower is, according to official FAA records, a valid registration today?
Yes.
Q12. — Is there any aircraft wreckage or video or other evidence that a commercial passenger aircraft hit the south tower?
No wreckage.
The videos which purport to show such a crash have been exposed as fakes.
The live shot (which did not actually show the plane hitting the building, but passing behind it, giving the illusion that it has impacted the hidden face) appears to have been animated in real time with this technology:
Lying with Pixels, by Ivan Imato, MIT's Technology review, July/August 2000.
http://www.nodeception.com/articles/pixel.jsp
And the footage shown retrospectively which appeared to show the strike directly has been animated with flight simulator. See the two links above for video analysis.
Pentagon
Q13. — Regarding flight AA77, which purportedly hit the Pentagon, what is known of this aircraft?
The answer is the same as for AA11. Not scheduled according to the BTS records.
Q14. — At the scene of the Pentagon incident was there any evidence at all which indicated that a commercial aircraft was involved?
No. In fact the damage to the building shows that its impossible for an aircraft of any significant size to have been involved.
Pennsylvania
Q15. — What information is available regarding flight UA93, which is purported to have crashed in Pennsylvania?
It was flown by tail number N591UA. The plane is still valid in the FAA aircraft registry. The scene where it is alleged to have crashed shows no evidence of any aircraft wreckage.
It therefore appears that considerable evidence exists to demonstrate that none of the four aircraft mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report actually crashed as stated.
Additionally, there appears to be a total lack of evidence to support the Kean Commission's claim.
16. Is this summary correct?
Yes.
Q17. Do you have anything further to add, before we offer this interview for debate?
There's plenty more which could be added on the subject of Sept. 11 generally.
DW: Thank you, Gerard.
David West may be reached at dgwest7 at yahoo.co.uk
Comment by Peter Meyer: When Gerard Holmgren first announced his discovery that there was no record in the BTS online database of AA11 and AA77 departing on September 11, 2001, I checked if what he claimed was true, and I found that it was. Accordingly I (as well as Gerard) saved the relevant web pages. They are available for download both from Gerard's website (as stated above) and from this Serendipity website. I discussed this matter in my article Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11 (published March 14, 2005), and I reproduce this section below:
As regards the planes, we must first note that the terms "AA 77", "UA 93", etc., do not denote planes, they denote flights. The statement "AA 77 hit the Pentagon" really means "the plane which departed (assuming it did) from Dulles Airport at 08:10 on 9/11 bound for Los Angeles hit the Pentagon."
The official story posits four planes, associated with four flight numbers, namely, AA 11, AA 77, UA 175 and UA 93. But we have no physical evidence of the existence of any of those four planes. According to the official story, the planes which departed as AA 11 and UA 175 completely disappeared as a result of the collapse of the Twin Towers, the plane which departed as AA 77 completely disappeared when it hit the Pentagon, and the plane which departed as UA 93 completely disappeared when it hit the ground at Shanksville. All four Boeing jets, big 757s and 767s, completely disappeared, with not one single piece of metal which can be proven to have come from any of those planes. Isn't this a bit odd?
So no physical evidence. But how about evidence from records of those flights? Records concerning domestic flights within the US are maintained online by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. When 9/11 researcher Gerard Holmgren checked those records he discovered that flights AA 11 and AA 77 were not scheduled to fly on 9/11. He published his discovery on 2003-11-13 and it was confirmed by others, including the author of this article (who saved the BTS web pages). Late in 2004 the BTS doctored their database so that now when one tries to confirm the original observation one reaches a web page (local copy here) stating:
On September 11, 2001, American Airlines Flight #11 and #77 and United Airlines #93 and #175 were hijacked by terrorists. Therefore, these flights are not included in the on-time summary statistics.
But there were originally records confirming that UA 93 and UA 175 departed (see the BTS web pages), so apparently these flights did exist. BTS removed those records to conceal the fact that there were never any records for AA 11 and AA 77.
If flights AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then there are only two planes, not four, to be accounted for. Investigators who have checked the tail numbers for the planes which departed as UA 93 and UA 175 on 9/11 (namely N591UA and N612UA respectively) believe that these planes are still in service. If so, and if AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then the number of Boeing 757s and 767s destroyed on 9/11 was not four, as the US government maintains, but rather zero.
BTS web pages showing the data as recorded before we found and reported the hoax.
Note added by Peter Meyer, 2005-06-29:
For those few who need it spelled out, the significance of Gerard Holmgren's discoveries in the BTS database is as follows:
The Bush administration declared on 9/11 that the Twin Towers and the Penoagon were hit by Boeing 757 and 767 jetliners which had been hijacked by Arab terrorists. On the basis of this assertion it implemented a (previously-prepared) plan for an attack on Afghanistan (to remove the Taliban and install a US-friendly government in Kabul), and it rushed through (previously-prepared) legislation restricting civil rights to the extent that the US Constitution was violated and every person subject to US jurisdiction became a potential terrorist until proven otherwise.
If Flights AA 11 and AA 77 never flew on the morning of 9/11 then they could not have been hijacked, and so could not have been hijacked by Arab terrorists. If Flight UA 175 was not destroyed on 9/11 then it did not crash into the South Tower and so whatever caused the South Tower explosion was not a jet flying under the control of Arab terrorists — though it may have been a (previously-prepared) napalm-loaded jet flying under remote control.
Thus if the records in the BTS database are to believed (and we have no reason to question the original records) then the claim made by the Bush Administration that 19 Arab terrorists (named within two days by the FBI) hijacked four Boeing jetliners on 9/11 is not only false, it must have been concocted as a deliberate attempt to deceive the people of the United States and the rest of the world, a deception intended to justify the ensuing US wars of aggression. Clearly whoever was responsible for the deception (no doubt the same people responsible for the planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks) must be removed from office, indicted, tried, convicted and punished appropriately. This is necessary if the U.S.A. is ever again to recover any degree of respect by the rest of the world.
The only way to identify the perpetrators is a commission of inquiry made up (in contrast to the Kean Commission) of people with experience in forensic investigation who are independent of, and not subject to influence by, those perps. Since 9/11 must have been carried out, at least in part, by elements within the US government, this excludes from service on such a commission anyone in Congress or the Justice Department who cannot prove beforehand that they will look at all the evidence, listen to all arguments, and follow that evidence and argument to wherever it leads, even if it leads to the highest levels of the US government. Until that happens the profound suspicion will remain that the US government is led by psychopathic thugs and murderers.
A copy of the entire Serendipity website is available on CD-ROM.
Debunking Popular Mechanics
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm
Tail Number anomalies
The Ultimate Con
Many of the newscasts were shown over and over again to ensure that viewer's minds were well saturated.
However, many news stories which occurred on an unplanned basis were never shown a second time.
Here is a collection of newsreels shown on 11th September 2001, which show very clearly that it was multiple explosions which brought down the Twin Towers.
This is the much awaited and anticipated complete 911 Documentary.
This has no narration or conjecture, only news footage and interviews to tell the story.