Sanctuary Cities

[NB: After this page, go to 9/25/2013 "China and Iran vs. USA" to see added information and the evolution of thinking.]

https://sites.google.com/site/huffmanontopic/china-and-iran-vs-usa

A SANCTUARY CITY IS A BEACHHEAD

By Gloria Merle Huffman

7/2/2010

(924 words)

Steve Salvi currently maintains a list of cities in the United States that formally or informally refuse to respect federal law regarding illegal aliens. These cities are sanctuaries for illegal immigrants:

"The Original List of Sanctuary Cities, USA"

http://www.ojjpac.org/sanctuary.asp (accessed 9/28/2013, 3/16/2022)

In Maine, they even let illegals get driver's licenses, which they can use to drive anywhere in the U.S. (and which they can use as valid proof of residence and of legal status).

Tonight I got it: the word that had eluded me which describes the essence of what I've been seeing in the nationwide camp-out of illegal aliens all over our land: BEACHHEADS.

The World War II Allied invasion of the beaches of Normandy in northern France (to liberate France from the German Nazis) began on June 6, 1944: D-Day ... the start of Operation Overlord. Operation Cobra was the rapid series of strikes from the beachheads of Normandy, France, beginning on July 24, 1944. Over 3 million men had landed on those beaches by the end of August 1944 when Operation Overlord ended with the successful expulsion of German troops from French soil.

BEACHHEAD: an area on a hostile shore seized and defended to secure further landing of troops and supplies; an initial advance position or foothold to be used as vantage ground for extending to new areas. (Webster's dictionary)

The countless sanctuary cities being built up with illegal aliens in the United States are, in my view, potential beachheads for guerrilla warfare troops from La Raza, interspersed with illegal alien civilians, who could conceivably serve as human shields.

President Barack Obama doesn't need to haul in troops from China, Indonesia, or even the United Nations. He only has to pull in a population of Mexicans that includes people (members or sympathizers of La Raza) with an agenda to attack the United States and "take back its land."

Once the infrastructure of the U.S. is laid waste or disabled, whoever is in power (as U.S. President) can take advantage of what no one will be able to deny is a clear national emergency. That's when Bush's Executive Order giving the president dictatorial powers in an emergency can be invoked. Then Bush's 'The White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives,' or OFBCI, renamed by the next man in line (Obama) 'The White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships,' will kick into high gear. It's an unholy partnership between churches (etc.) and government funds.

Government charity (especially food) is now distributed to the poor (i.e., mostly the illegal aliens) through churches and like organizations which used to be perfectly competent without government help. They were not in financial distress when Bush decided to offer them the government's cash cow money. Measures were written into his policy that maintained separation of Church and State. However, since the entire policy comes under the President's Executive Office, that flimsy scaffolding separating Church and State can be removed with a stroke of the presidential pen. By that time, the government will have managed to force churches to hire or use people who are not affiliated with their religion (including Muslims).

The slowness or outright reluctance of the Faith-Based Initiatives policy to insist that churches hire and/or use non-Christians impelled the first director of OFBCI, John Dilulio, to quit his job. I had wrongly jumped to the conclusion that he became disaffected with OFBCI because he disagreed with the potential for future inroads on churches by the State. I quickly discovered that his gripe was the very opposite: he wanted to impose governmental standards of "diversity," "fairness" and "tolerance" on the churches (think "race," "religious affiliation" and "sexual orientation"), and it wasn't happening ... yet. He even wanted Christian churches to be forced to hire or use non-Christians in their charity work. In effect, that means stationing "non-Christians" (including Muslims) within the hallowed walls of those churches. Can't those churches see what danger they have clasped to their breasts?

Whether anyone agrees with the social policies of those churches or not, it is easy to see that their “freedom of religion” dissolves like metal in acid when they turn from their own efforts in charity work to suck up the facile milk from the government's teat.

When sufficient Muslims are stationed throughout this additional set of church and community charity "beachheads," the entire U.S. population will be surrounded, and even the churches where people often seek physical shelter will be unsafe as refuges.

It looks like I have painted a bleak picture of the many poor innocent people who just want to come here to rake leaves and clean toilets for lack of anything better to do in Mexico. In any case, I still maintain that sanctuary cities are beachheads for future unrest involving illegal Mexicans and their frightening weapons. Supporters of illegal immigrants point to the fact that they are engaging in work as productive people, but they fail to mention that this work is the way any flower, plant or tree puts down roots in order to feed and sustain itself. Being a productive worker is not the litmus test for internal motivations. Some proponents of anarchy remind their followers that they must lead a normal life and blend into society, only taking actions that will not land them in jail -- a place from which it is impossible to be an activist, anarchist, or combatant of any kind.

We are asleep just as the Germans were while the Allies invaded northern and then southern France in a brilliant pincer strategy June-August 1944.

We think the illegal aliens are about jobs and crime. Too many of them are about war. I didn't make this up. Many of them say so themselves, in very rude and impolite terms.

Stamford, Connecticut, must be a sanctuary city, because illegal aliens regularly line up 200 at a time at the local food pantry which requires no agency referral ("we serve everybody"). In June 2010 the food pantry "clients" began receiving the new "green cards" entitling them to free food. Now that's a doorway to linguistic confusion!

“Do you have a green card?” “Yes.”.

“That is not a green card for legal aliens. It's a green card for the food pantry.”

“I'm confused. It's a green card. What's a green card?”

Later news report: “Illegal aliens will now be able to exchange their illegal alien [free-food] 'green cards' for legal alien [immigration] green cards.”

And, presto, change-o: the illegal aliens suddenly get their immigration green cards and become legal immigrants.

For thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico, getting a foot in the door in the U.S. (via the sanctuary city beachheads) is the wedge that leads to what promises to be a free ride ... until they figure out they've been lured to the U.S. to further the aims of the globalists in the Council on Foreign Relations who stated in a May 17, 2005 memo that they wanted the North American Union (NAU) to be established by 2010, with no borders at either Canada or Mexico. (See North American Union, Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union (accessed 9/28/2013)) [1][2][3]

So much for the Nation of Aztlan! The Mexican invasion was encouraged only as a means to mixing the populations and erasing the border. U.S. land will not "revert" to Mexico, it will all be absorbed into the centralized region of the NAU.

How is it that the aging Baby Boomers are going to bankrupt the entire system if we have so much abundance that we can throw millions of dollars' worth of food, clothing, toys, housing, gas money, and school and college tuition money at millions of illegal aliens? How is it that the "Powers That Be" are willing to kill off the old guys and change the makeup of the entire population in a few short years by means of these beachheads? Have they no respect, no reverence for the human lives of the people who are already here?

I am Pro-Choice: I am an aging American Baby Boomer (upon whom genocide was committed with the 1969 birth control pill, the same year of 1969 when Corky Gonzalez declared that the Nation of Aztlan would take United States land for Mexico), and I choose to live. I have a right to be here, too. So make me a Sanctuary City, an American Beachhead for Americans!

____

[1] "In May [17,] 2005, the CFR Independent Task Force on the Future of North America published a ... report titled Building a North American Community – proposing a borderless three-nation union by 2010."The True Story of the Bilderberg Group and What They May Be Planning Now:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-true-story-of-the-bilderberg-group-and-what-they-may-be-planning-now/13808 (accessed 9/28/2013)

[2] Council on Foreign Relations, Task Force Report: "Building a North American Community," May 17, 2005 (PDF file) http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102 (accessed 10/12/2013)

[3] "Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade and Ensure Border Security," May 17, 2005, Council on Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/competitiveness/task-force-urges-measures-strengthen-north-american-competitiveness-expand-trade-ensure-border-security/p8104 (accessed 10/12/2013)

© 2010 Gloria Merle Huffman

#

FAITH-BASED INITIATIVES

ARE SUPPLY SHIPS

By Gloria Merle Huffman

7/2/2010

211 words

In war time, it is important to supply your troops with food, fuel and other necessities while on foreign soil. Some of those supplies are air-dropped, some are carried by rail, and some are sent on supply ships.

But what if you didn't have to have supply ships because your (Mexican, etc.) troops were legally supplied right from the (U.S.) enemy's own food pantries and charities?

Instantly, the role of Bush's Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives plan, which involves countless local food pantries serving illegal aliens, takes on a whole new character. This character also applies to any non-OFBCI churches or other charitable organizations serving illegal aliens in defiance of the law.

Illegal Mexicans on "foreign" U.S. soil (which is "theirs," according to many of them) have legally shanghied supplies from the land they have invaded, for it is the federal government and the sanctuary cities which are providing their ongoing supplies. The illegals are becoming rooted and entrenched on our soil. Their warfare against us will be referred to as a "civil war" because they will become equal in status to the citizens of the country they have invaded.

Food pantries have become supply ships. That is why we must fight "Faith-Based Initiatives" and other organizations serving illegal aliens.

In war time, you attack your enemy's supply ships.

If we don't attack the serving of illegal aliens by food pantries and other charitable services now, we will find ourselves glued to our self-proclaimed enemies (La Raza) like Bre'r Rabbit and the Tar Baby when they start their own version of Operation Cobra from the beachheads of their dozens of sanctuary cities here, gained through the various maneuvres of their own Operation Overlord. (Cf. World War II, D-Day. See my article above, "Sanctuary Cities Are Beachheads.")

It is better to fight them with words and laws while we still can, instead of waiting until we're being gunned down in the streets and grenades and bombs are exploding like in Beirut two decades ago.

© 2010 Gloria Merle Huffman

[NOTE (9/21/2013): The above piece was written almost three years before the April 15, 2013, bombing at the Boston Marathon in Massachusetts, USA.]

[NOTE (3/28/2015): The Boston Marathon bombers (mentioned in the note above) were two Muslim brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who came with their parents to the U.S. in 2002 as refugees from Dagestan. Their mother is a radical extremist and supporter of jihad. Muslim jihadists are not unrelated to the influx of illegal aliens from Mexico, as Iran has been funding the conversion of Mexicans from Catholicism to Islam, with a view to having Mexican Muslim jihadists cross the border illegally into America. See my 9/25/2013 article, "China & Iran vs. USA," for elaboration on this topic.]

© 2010 Gloria Merle Huffman

#

DEUTSCHE CHRISTEN AND

FAITH-BASED INITIATIVES

By Gloria Merle Huffman

7/16/2010

(473 words)

In Nazi Germany, the move to consolidate churches into one Nazi Reich's Church (the Deutsche Christen: "German Christians") was based upon actions and mandates that placed allegiance to Hitler and his Nazi government's policies above the churches' own faiths and creeds. The Nazi idea was to infiltrate all the churches and neutralize all religious thought from within, eventually destroying all vestiges of both Jewish and Christian elements.

In 21st century America, George Bush's Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, followed by Obama's name change to Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, has created a stealth-based approach to government control of churches through the churches' own outreach programs to the needy.

John Dilulio, first director of Bush's Faith-Based Initiatives program, resigned because the Nazi-style techniques for counteracting religious thought and religious autonomy (replacing religious policies with non-religious ones, and requiring allegiance to the government) weren't happening fast enough to suit him (i.e., U.S. churches weren't being forced to hire or use non-religious people or people of other religions in their government-supported charity work).

The point here is not necessarily that the ultimate agenda in both cases is the same (the agenda behind the creation of the Deutsche Christen and the creation of the Faith-Based Initiatives), but that the vehicle for achieving the respective countries' agendas is the same.

NAZIS:

1. Infiltrate churches with Nazi supporters.

2. Destroy Jewish underpinnings of Christian churches: require adoption of the 'Aryan paragraph' forbidding people with even a drop of Jewish blood from becoming ministers or leaders.

3. Destroy Christian principles themselves: neutralize church creeds by requiring Nazi policies and a statement/show of allegiance to the German State.

AMERICANS (Bush and Obama):

1. Infiltrate churches (require churches with government-supported charity programs to hire/use people of other religions or even no religion in their charity work).

2. Destroy the unique identity of the people administering the church charity programs by requiring those churches to hire/use homosexuals or people of other religions or even no religion in their charity work). [Remember that the point is not the intrinsic worth of homosexuals, but the right of churches to make their own value judgments about homosexuality.]

3. Destroy Christian principles and replace them with the beliefs and values of the people currently in power in the government (through the Trojan Horse of the Faith-Based Initiatives charity work).

I'm beginning to see why certain churches refuse to become involved in church-run [but government-funded*] community charity programs. It's not because they don't care about the poor and needy. It's because they see the potential for inroads on their church through that road of "service:" Just as they can travel out on that road, so others can travel into their church structure (including others they don't want to include).

I see a connection here between the German Nazis (of the 1930s and 1940s) and the American Faith-Based Initiatives (of 2001-2009+). This is something I figured out on my own. Do you see it?

© 2010 Gloria Merle Huffman

* (Edited 3/28/2015)

~*~

[8/10/2012 NB: World War II survivor Kitty Werthmann sees it (Austrian-born, naturalized U.S. citizen). She describes this process clearly. Watch a condensed version of her speech on video here (the sanctuary movement, run by American churches, is discussed at 4:37-6:05): "Old whacko Austrian lady says America is totally, exactly, perfectly, 100% Nazi Germany" (excerpts)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlB4ZLLxCNk (accessed 9/28/2013)

View text here (text is widely copied online): http://www.futurityartswest.com/webnews/kittywerthmann.htm (accessed 9/28/2013)

Numerous websites with the text of the 6/28/2011 speech now have disabled videos of that event. It is interesting that in Werthmann's speech she refers to Obama's "Snitch Program," where people who criticize him or say anything "fishy" about his health care plan are to be reported to the White House. See U.S. Gov. Exec. Order here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness (accessed 9/28/2013) and civilian responses here: "Obama 'snitch' program put on notice:" http://www.wnd.com/2009/08/106174/ (accessed 9/28/2013)

© 2012 Gloria Merle Huffman

#

[NB: After this page, go to 9/25/2013 "China and Iran vs. USA" to see added information and the evolution of thinking.]

https://sites.google.com/site/huffmanontopic/china-and-iran-vs-usa