Energy & Environment

If you think there's a climate-change conspiracy, ask yourself who's more likely to be lying: CEOs profiting from the top 100 corporations that are responsible for more than 70% of greenhouse emissions produced since 1988 (with just 20 companies linked to a third of emissions), or scientists who far from having been guilty of exaggeration are finding that their initial predictions seriously understated how rapid and severe the changes would be?

And if you don't trust those media references on that (quite reasonably), listen to the science-sceptical scientist, Sabine Hossenfelder, who's read much of the climate science and also concluded that if anything the scientists are understating the risks.

But it doesn't matter if you still have doubts about the escalating impacts of human-induced global warming; it's a significant risk (if not a total certainty), but thankfully one we can still (just) readily address as there are many cost-effective solutions available for limiting climate change, if we're willing to take on vested interests.  Basically, it's the best value insurance you'll ever get — see my 2006 SMH letter about managing these risks (responding to this article):

For thoughts on specific areas to pursue, see the following links and discussion on sustainable energy:

and, looking beyond climate change:

plus: