Post date: Jul 10, 2010 11:32:29 AM
I'll just go with the 3 top ones by now:
1: Have you compared your results with other systems? Yep, because I have unlimited money to travel to every university/lab in the world and they'll open their doors for me to prove that my algorithm is better than theirs. Come on! Or maybe you are suggesting I should recreate the work of a full team of persons for years just for a quick paragraph in the results section? Nah, I got it now, I just go to megaupload and download the MIT software, because it MUST be somewehre for me to use ...
2: There are misspellings and grammar errors, you should find a native for proofreading (and that is it, no more comments). In my paper and also in your review, dear. Have you even bothered to read anything but my english style or do you really have no idea on the subject at all?
3: You have forgotten to refer to AAAA and BBBB in your work, which are very pertinent and interesting references and MUST be there. Ow? They are about the migratory habits of royal eagles and my paper is on robot navigation but, hey, give me 5 minutes ... yep, the author of those works IS in the reviewers' list of the journal I've submitted my paper to- OF COURSE, I have to refer those two, how could I forget?
6 reviews in the last month, I'm starting to feel a bit cranky ...