By: Gabby Dela Cruz
In the past couple years, class sizes have become overwhelmingly large. Classrooms are becoming packed and overcrowded, and students are being negatively impacted by the large class sizes. Class sizes do, in fact, matter and they make an impact on students every day.
Some may argue that these large class sizes are acceptable, because it saves the district money. This does save the district money, but it is getting out of hand. According to an article titled, “The Systemic Problem of High Class Size,” by the Clark County Education Association, Nevada has class sizes that are among the largest in the nation. For example, 4-12th grade class size averages have reached a ratio of 33-36:1, when it really should be at around a 22-25:1 ratio.
Nevada doesn’t have a large enough budget to reduce class sizes. In the article it states, “ If class sizes were reduced to originally conceived levels in all grades, it would cost $309.9M” (new.ccea-nv.org).This is more than double the budget that Nevada has for teachers. The district is saving money and staying on budget with larger class sizes, however, classroom sizes are becoming way too large.
These large class sizes come with many negative effects. One of the main negative effects of large class sizes is less individualized attention. Students in the larger classes won’t get as much individual attention from their teachers, simply because there are just too many students for one teacher to address. Other effects include a disruptive learning environment, less participation, and the teachers being overwhelmed with too many students.
Smaller classes can also be proven to be a better learning environment, opposed to large classes. In multiple studies, students in small classes out tested students in large classes. In the STAR (Student Teacher Achievement Ratio) study, students and teachers were randomly assigned to a small class and a regular-sized class. The small class, which consisted of 15 students, was found to achieve more than the regular class, which had 22 students.
In a Brookings research article, it states, “This large reduction in class size (7 students, or 32 percent) was found to increase student achievement by an amount equivalent to about 3 additional months of schooling four years later” (www.brookings.edu). This reveals that students were more successful in the small classes, opposed to the larger classes. Students are getting better education and they are learning better in smaller classes opposed to larger classes.
photo by: www.thegnainsider.com
In a an article that also talks about the STAR study, by the University of California Berkeley, it states, “The results were strong. An average student assigned to the smallest classes had a reading score nearly 8 percent higher than students in the medium-sized classes. The smaller-class students, on average, achieved 9 percent higher math scores” (gspp.berkeley.edu). This reveals that the class size difference made a huge impact on the students’ test scores. Therefore, not only large classes are shown to have a negative impact on students, but students in smaller sized classes are proven to be more successful.
Conclusively, class sizes have been getting out of hand. They are getting way too large and there is evidence that shows that this is having a negative effect on students. While the large class sizes are having a negative impact on students, smaller class sizes are showing more student achievement and showing that those students are more successful. All in all, class sizes are only getting larger, and something has to be done to change this.