Gathering Data - PPW

Gathering Data on MESP Factors:

Gathering data is about finding out information about your performance in your chosen factor.

Data can be qualiative or quantiative.

Qualiative Data - Based on opinion or people’s views - PPW/General Observation Schedule

Quantiaitve Data - Based on fact or numbers - Bleep Test/SCAT test

Profile Wheel

Use for ANY factor

PPWs can be compared

They can be compared to your own performance, a model performer and can be checked by a coach.

Describe a method you used to gather data on your performance (4 marks)

The profile wheel can be used as a method to gather data on ANY MESP Factor and involves:

A performer filling out a circular shaped profile wheel on a piece of paper. This is split into 8 different factors, with each section containing a different factor/sub-factor.
A performer rates themselves in relation to each factor giving themselves a score between 1-10. 1 = weakness. 10= strength
The profile is filled out by the performer after a match/competition.
To complete the PPW you shade up from the middle.
Player can then fill in another profile wheel for a model performer.
Player analyses information to identify their weaknesses by comparing their results to that of a model performer.
A Coach can also complete profile wheel for player.
Player and coach compare results, agree development targets and plan development programme.

Explain why you used this method to gather data on your performance (4 marks)

Point>Explanation>Example

Method is Valid: because the profile wheel asks you to rate your abilities in relation to specific factors/ subfactors. This allows you to establish what your development needs area as you can compare you performance across a number of different sub-factors and identify what you need to work on most.

Method is Accurate: because all of my answers were honest . I was able to complete my profile wheel at home, this meant I took my time in completing the method as I was not rushed or distracted and rated my abilities based on my true feelings.

Method is Reliable: because it was practical as it was quick and easy to complete. This meant that I did not get bored in a long winded process and was able to really focus and give honest answers as I remained motivated. The questions were simple and the clear layout and numerical scoring system made it easy for me to analyse the information.

Results Quantifiable and easy to understand: the test gave me a numerical score for each sub-factor. I could then analyse my data and compare my results to a model performer to identify my development needs in a simple way.

Results kept as permanent record: this meant I was able to compare my subsequent re-tests back to my initial data to measure my improvements. This then lead to me receiving a boost in confidence when I noticed my progress and enabled me to set even more challenging goals to ensure I did not plateau.'*

Analyse a method to gather data on your performance (4 marks)

Break down method into different parts> Analyse each part

The method allows you to easily compare your results to a model performer. This can be useful . however it is important that you use a realistic model performer. This is because if you used an elite athlete such as Serena Williams, you may lose motivation and confidence as you will find that you are consistently marking yourself lower than them which can then lead to you giving up.

The Profile wheel is a practical method and can be filled out in different locations. This could help you to give more accurate responses as if you complete the PPW at home you will get less distracted by your team mates. You are also more likely to be honest as you may feel embarrassed if you complete the PPW in front of your teammates.

The performer rates their own performance. This may lead to more accurate & reliable results as the performer knows exactly how he/she felt during the performance. However if a performer is not honest, and lies because they feel embarrassed this will invalidate the data.

The performer can fill out the profile wheel after a performance. This could lead to the data being more accurate as the performer can remember exactly how they feel, however they could exaggerate their ratings depending if they have just experienced a big win or painful defeat. This would mean their data is less reliable.

Evaluate your results in comparison to a Model Performer (4 marks)

Point >Evaluative Judgement>Example

The data shows that a strength in my performance is my smash as I perform this shot just as effectively as a model performer with a rating of 9/10. This is because in a game both me and a model performer can hit powerful shots that my opponent cannot return.

A shot I am very consistent at is my high serve. I scored 8/10 for this, the same as a model performer meaning I can serve the shuttle high and to the back of the court. This forces my opponent back and creates space at the front for me to attack.

One area of my performance that is a weakness is my short serve as I only rated this as 3/10. A model performer would score much higher as they can get the shuttle much lower over the net meaning the opponent cannot attack.

My dropshot is much weaker than that of a model performer. I scored 4/10 because I do not get the shuttle low enough to the net, this makes it easier for my opponent to return my shots. A model performer has a higher level of precision.

Question – Evaluate how effective this method was for collecting data on Mental Factors (3)

The PPW is an effective method of collecting data on mental factors because it is checked by a coach. This means I can complete the questionnaire honestly myself and a coach can check my responses to ensure they are an accurate representation of my strengths and weaknesses.

The PPW is an effective method of collecting data on mental factors because it can be kept and compared back to.

This means I can complete the PPW in week 1 as a baseline test and then recomplete in the middle and end of my PDP to check if the PDP is working and I am improving my mental skills.

The PPW is ineffective if I do not complete it honestly. This means if I rate myself too highly I will get information which is invalid. This could mean I think I am improving during my PDP as I have rated myself 7/10 for concentration when I should actually be rating myself 4/10. This could lead to me gaining false information and working on the wrong weakness during my PDP.

Report abuse