Models of Student Support
Models of Student Support
Chapter 16 in Framing Student Affairs Practice in Student Services a Handbook for the Profession
Out of Classroom-Centered
Extracurricular: Student affairs professionals focus on student development in the out-of-classroom environment. Student engagement activities are predominantly initiated by student affairs professionals. Faculty members emphasize intellectual development and are less involved in non-cognitive student development.
Co-curricular: Approach depicts student affairs professionals as educators. Professional determine learning goals and set their sights on the development of students outside of the academic mission. This model sets the stage for a lively campus life.
Administrative-Centered
Functional Silos: This model believes students are best served through discrete programs, services, and environments. These educators have extensive professional expertise from their specific area and provide a high level of professional expertise to students. Staff, supervision, professional development, and goals are autonomous by department.
Student Services: The student services model believes students are best served by accessing services through a customer-oriented, corporate approach. Students, often seen as clients, rarely develop close, personal relationships with staff members but interact on a transactional level.
Learning-Centered
Competitive-Adversarial: Academic and student affairs missions are separate and, at times, at odds. There are high levels of expertise from both sides with a strong commitment to student learning.
Seamless Learning: Faculty and student affairs staff members develop integrated, complementary experiences for students. Programs and services are collaborative efforts between academic and student affairs. The student experience is best conceived of as an ongoing developmental process, from the time a student enrolls to graduation. Everyone on campus contributes to the student learning effort.
Chapter 16 in Framing Student Affairs Practice in Student Services a Handbook for the Profession p. 375-378.
Student-Centered
Ethic of Care: Embodies the underlying belief that with proper support and caring, all students can succeed in college. Services and programs are developed to maximize student success and engagement. Departments and units are organized so services are interrelated and safety nets established. This model is most effective when student and academic affairs assume shared responsibility for student engagement and success.
Student-Drive: The student-driven model is characterized by trust, empowerment, and leadership. This model assumes students can manage their functions, programming, and activities with gentle and minimal guidance from student affairs professionals. Assumes college environment provides rich opportunities to teach student leadership and engender engagement.
Student Agency: Students are completely responsible for student life. Students are viewed as equal partners to administrators. faculty, and other staff. In this model, faculty and administrators are policy, climate, and administrative structure creators which empower students and facilitate learning (p. 380). Student support staff take a hands-off approach, while students are urged to take full responsibility for their educations.
Academic-Centered
Academic-Student Affairs Collaboration: Academic and student affairs combine to create a mutual territory which combines efforts on engagement and success. Creativity is encouraged and resources are shared.
Academic-Driven: Institutions are organized around the academic core and privilege the academic experience over traditional student life activities. Staff and faculty share responsibility for student success and engagement as they understand ways faculty members and students can develop a rich intellectual community. The role of student support services is to provide structure support while supporting and sustaining roles in achieving goals related to the academic mission. Student support staff teach and contribute directly to the educational mission. Student support goals are deeply aligned with the academic mission.
Chapter 16 in Framing Student Affairs Practice in Student Services a Handbook for the Profession p. 378-381.
Discover the current model(s) in use by your institution. Using the venn-diagram provided, compare and contrast your institutions model with one of the models presented in this module.
Schuh, H. J., Jones, R . S., & Torres Vasti. (2016). "Chapter 16 - Framing Student Affairs Practice" in Student Services a Handbook for the Profession. Sixth Edition. Jossey-Bass. 375-381(https://app.luminpdf.com/viewer/63d423996f7eccd7a75f1c8a)