Hank gets into the dirty details behind our lying ways - how such behavior evolved, how pathological liars are different from the rest of us, and how scientists are getting better at spotting lies in many situations.
One of the most common misconceptions is the belief in universal signs of deception—consistent, reliable indicators that a person is lying. There are some signs that appear more frequently among liars than truth tellers; however, there has been no universal sign of lying identified.
There are two primary ways that people lie—concealment and falsification. Concealment occurs when a person evades the question or omits relevant details. Liars often prefer this because it can be difficult to reveal. Without evidence it can be challenging or nearly impossible to validate the truth or falsity of a person’s statement. Concealment is easier than falsification because the liar does not have to remember what was said previously, and it provides numerous built-in excuses. For example, the liar can claim ignorance or a faulty memory.
Despite the inherent difficulties of detecting a lie, social scientists are beginning to better understand the psychological, emotional, and behavioral cues associated with deceit. To date three approaches have demonstrated the most promise: 1) emotional, 2) cognitive, and 3) attempted control.
A standard polygraph instrument records changes in blood pressure, pulse rate, pulse strength, galvanic skin reflex (sweat gland activity) and upper and lower breathing patterns.
It does not matter if the examinee is "nervous" during the testing process - that is to be expected. The polygraph records significant changes from the subject's "norm" when specific questions are asked. A person intending deception to a particular question will activate his/her Sympathetic Nervous System as a "self defense" mechanism when that question is asked on the test. The SNS activation will cause recognizable changes in one or more of the physical responses.
The polygraph works by recording changes in a person's Sympathetic Nervous System, part of the Autonomic Nervous System, which operates independently of conscious thought. For example, your lungs and heart continue to operate even when you are asleep - you don't have to think about them. These systems can be consciously controlled only very slightly, and attempts to change these systems are usually picked up by the examiners, who are trained to identify such things. It is highly unlikely that someone can alter the outcome of a polygraph exam, but it is not impossible.
Most examiners are now using "countermeasures detection" equipment which easily identifies anyone attempting to use the techniques taught by some web sites and government agencies. Unfortunately, many honest people are found "deceptive" to the test questions after attempting to use these techniques simply because they attempted to influence their test results. When an examiner discovers that the examinee is doing things to affect the charts, the result is either "deception indicated" or "inconclusive." In other words, a person will not pass a polygraph by using these techniques. In fact, recent research (2008-2009) has determined that in most cases when someone attempts to use the techniques taught on the internet to "beat" a polygraph, their test results actually GET WORSE (their scores indicate greater deception than if they had done nothing). Use of certain drugs and medications can also affect the exam, but such use generally results in an "inconclusive" test. It is virtually impossible to change a result from "deceptive" to "truthful" through the use of drugs or medications prior to an exam. If drugs are suspected, a pre-test (or post-test) drug screening is advised.
U.S. Government and American Polygraph Association studies previously concluded that the single-issue (one question) polygraph exam, conducted properly by a qualified examiner, is 87 to 95 percent accurate on average.
[ This statistic has been achieved by highly-trained polygraph and behavior specialists through close examination of suspects. ]
Accuracy of the multi-question exam drops to around 80 percent due to a number of psychological factors. These statistics do not include "inconclusive" results in which no opinion can be made from the polygraph charts, which happens about 5 to 10% of the time.
This website explains what it can be like to receive a polygraph test.
Truth or Lies? It can be difficult to tell. Experts in related fields vary in their certainty. The reliability seems to be with highly trained and experienced professionals that interpret the data.
No. Compulsive liars may not be able to stop telling lies, but they absolutely know when they are telling a lie. As long as the person being tested knows what reality is, the polygraph will work fine.
Polygraph results are admissible in many courts, but the final decision usually rests with the individual judge or arbitrator. Civil courts are more likely to admit polygraph evidence than criminal courts. If you intend to use polygraph results as evidence, you should select an examiner who has testified and been approved as an "expert."
Some judges will require a "Daubert" hearing to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence on a case-by-case basis. As time goes on, more and more jurisdictions are tending toward accepting polygraph evidence.
If the polygraph results are to be used in a legal proceeding, you must use the most accurate and scientifically validated method available. This requires that only a "specific issue" format be used covering one item only per test. Other formats (such as multiple issue tests) do not have the accuracy levels needed to be used as evidence.
Since a polygraph is actually several instruments combined into one, each component was developed independently of the others. These components were finally combined in 1938.
A diagram of Dr. James Mackenzie's famous 1906 polygraph. He was the founder of 20th century British cardiology, which is an area of specialty medicine focused on disorders of the heart and parts of the circulatory system. More Info
Former CIA officer Phil Houston created new techniques for recognizing lies. Houston speaks to John Miller and the "CBS This Morning" co-hosts about recognizing deceptive answers and a book he just co-authored, "Spy the Lie."
YouTube video LINK. 7:23min
Sometimes words don't matter. You can learn more about what someone is up to by the way they move and the look on their face. It's body language. And Retired FBI agent Joe Navarro says it's often more reliable than what someone actually says. Consumer Warning Network's Angie Moreschi interviewed Navarro, an expert on human behavior, about his new book What Every BODY is Saying, to get some insight on how to avoid getting scammed.
" The motor cortex located on the left side of the brain controls movement on the right side of the body.
The best view of the brain's motor cortex is from a brain that has been sliced in half. The image to the left displays a brain that has been sliced lengthwise, dividing the front and back halves, viewed from the back.
The cartoon-like drawings in the illustration show how much of the brain's motor cortex is devoted to controlling specific body parts. The reason that some body parts are depicted larger than others (for example, the hand is larger than the shoulder) is that there are more muscles controlling those areas."
Source: PBS WGBH
Paul Ekman has conducted extensive research on identifying emotions through facial expressions for close to 50 years. As part of that research,
including many that in most of us are beyond our control, and even awareness.
" Micro expressions are facial expressions that occur within 1/25th of a second. They are involuntary and expose a person’s true emotions. They can happen as a result of conscious suppression or unconscious repression. These facial expressions are universal, meaning they occur on everyone around the world.
At least five of these are shared with non-human primates as well. Interestingly, the smile is the easiest expression to recognize, and the easiest to identify from afar. These emotions have a specific trigger, come quickly without thought, and interact with your physiology — meaning merely making the fear expression will create a fear response in your body as well. With fear, neurons will signal your body to prepare to flee by sending blood to the large voluntary muscles in your legs. In anger, on the other hand, your brain signals your body to fight by sending blood to your hands. "