Heathrow expansion given green light
A third runway at Heathrow is unlikely to boost the UK economy but will certainly boost noise, air pollution and climate emissions. It’s airlines and airport bosses who will reap the lion’s share of economic benefits, leaving taxpayers and holidaymakers to pay billions for new infrastructure and transport links.
Click here to see Greenpeace UK reporting in 2020 on the 3rd runway.
January 2025, Unearthed
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has backed a third runway at Heathrow, stating that the expansion of Europe’s busiest airport is “badly needed” for economic growth. Her “growth at all costs” stance puts her at odds with climate secretary Ed Miliband, who recently warned that airport expansions won’t proceed unless they meet climate targets. The decision marks the conclusion of a decades-long saga of debate and protest over Heathrow’s expansion.
Reeves claims "sustainable aviation fuels" (SAFs) and electric planes could help offset the project’s emissions, but such technologies remain in early stages. The UK’s Climate Change Committee has repeatedly warned against expansion without a national framework to limit emissions.
While sustainable fuels are expected to account for 2% of the UK's jet fuel this year, scaling up remains a major challenge. A recent analysis by Carbon Brief found that a forest twice the size of Greater London would need to be planted to offset the extra emissions from the expansion of Heathrow, Gatwick and Luton airports. Reeves said decisions on Gatwick and Luton expansions will be made “shortly” by the transport secretary.
Click here to read the most recent Q&As on the topic.