Philosophy
AI in Danish Schools (Instagram Video)
LaPierre, S. S. (2023, September). Educators Find Value in ChatGPT. Computers in Libraries, 43(7), 31+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A766816067/PROF?u=ko_k12hs_d60&sid=bookmark-PROF&xid=ea8f3190
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), NA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A759040534/PROF?u=ko_k12hs_d60&sid=bookmark-PROF&xid=0c8e9da1
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), NA. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A762972111/GPS?u=ko_k12hs_d60&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=2ef5099d
Notably, while AI detection tools can provide some insights, their inconsistent performance and dependence on the sophistication of the AI models necessitate a more holistic approach for academic integrity cases, combining AI tools with manual review and contextual considerations. The findings also call for reassessing traditional educational methods in the face of AI and digital technologies, suggesting a shift towards AI-enhanced learning and assessment while fostering an environment of academic honesty and responsibility.
Looked at: OpenAI, Writer, Copyleaks, GPTZero, and CrossPlag
How Schools Can Survive (and Maybe Even Thrive) With A.I. This Fall from New York Times
Coded Bias Docs for Schools
D: Shalini Kantayya | 2020 | 90 min | Recommended for Grades 7-12
When MIT researcher and computer scientist Joy Buolamwini realized that most facial recognition technology could not properly identify darker-skinned faces, she knew she had to take action. What she uncovers is widespread bias in AI and algorithmic design that affect how many people are treated on a daily basis.