HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplant) is not a drug, it is a procedure that involves harvesting of stem cells that first need to be mobilised from the bone marrow using low dose chemotherapy and growth factors. The stem cells are harvested from the blood and frozen down or stored. MSers undergoing HSCT then have their immune system depleted to a greater (myeloablative) or lesser extent (non-myeloablative) with chemotherapy. The stems cells are re-infused to allow more rapid recovery of bone marrow and immune function. In general HSCT not a 'licensed therapy' for treating MS, but is offered as a treatment in many countries for more active disease. HSCT is typically used to treat highly active MS that has not responded to standard DMTs. HSCT is on the list of essential off-label DMTs because it is a generic procedure and is available in many countries. In other words it can be used for treating MS where access to high-cost licensed DMTs may be limited.
HSCT is simply a rebranding of bone marrow transplantation or BMT. BMT was the term we used when the stem cells had to be harvested by doing a bone marrow aspirate; i.e. a thick needle was inserted into the bone and the marrow sucked out under pressure. This procedure is painful and is done under sedation. I remember it very well when I was a houseman and junior medical registrar, or trainee, I worked on a haem-oncology unit and had to do this procedure. Fortunately, the haematologists have now developed an effective way of mobilising and harvesting stem cells from the blood without having to tap the bone marrow. This is done by giving a small dose of chemotherapy followed by growth factors so that the stem cells spillover from the bone marrow into the blood. These stem cells are harvested and frozen and can then be given after immunoablation therapy. Immunoablation therapy refers to chemotherapy to get rid of your immune cells.
Please note that all that these stem cells do is allow you to receive more potent chemotherapy and work by allowing your bone marrow to recover more quickly. There is nothing magic about HSCT. HSCT simply speeds up bone marrow recovery after immune system ablation, nothing more and nothing less. More rapid bone marrow recovery makes BMT safer, i.e. you have less chance of getting a life threatening infection or bleeding.
The stem cells in HSCT don't go to the brain and spinal cord to repair the damage. This is a common misperception. People think the hematopoietic stem cells are being given to repair the damage that has accrued from having MS. Recovery of neurological function that is seen after HSCT is spontaneous endogenous repair, which we see with all of our DMTs, but particularly the highly effective DMTs. This is why HSCT, like other DMTs, is more effective when used early before MS causes too much damage and in younger MSers (as you get older your nervous system's ability to repair itself drops off).
There are different intensities of bone marrow ablation therapy. So-called myeloablative therapy is aimed at wiping out your immune system completely and replacing it with a new immune system. Non-myeloablative therapy is less intense in that it simply depletes your immune system partially and allows it to be rebooted (partially). The non-myeloablative therapy is clearly less risky than the myeloablative therapy but less effective. In other words, more MSers have a recurrence of their disease activity after non-myeloablative HSCT (NM-HSCT), when compared to ablative-HSCT (A-HSCT). The chemotherapy that is used for NM-HSCT is less toxic.
Many in the field are of the opinion that if you are going to treat MS with HSCT you need to go the more aggressive route and use the more toxic and risky A-HSCT. They argue that NM-HSCT is not really better than the current high-efficacy drugs we are currently using to manage MS, i.e. alemtuzumab and/or natalizumab and/or ocrelizumab. This is why we are proposing to do a trial comparing alemtuzumab with NM-HSCT to see if NM-HSCT is more efficacious than alemtuzumab and to see if the potential benefits of HSCT warrant the risks.
The chances of dying from the NM-HSCT is in the order of 0.3%-1%; i.e. 1-in-330 to a 1-in-100 chance of dying. Then there is the toxicity associated with the chemotherapy; nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, hair loss, bleeding, infections, infertility and neurotoxicity to name a few. It seems that the more disabled you are the worse the neurotoxicity. If you have lost a lot of nerve fibres already and have reduced brain reserve you handle chemotherapy poorly. The chemotherapy worsens neurological function. This is why a large number of BMT units stopped using this therapy in MSers with more advanced MS and is the reason why most units have an upper EDSS limit as part of their inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Once your immune system recovers post-HSCT does it go back to normal? There is evidence that HSCT may result in a rejuvenation of your immune system and changes the so-called repertoire of your B and T cells; i.e. it changes the memory of B and T cells. At the moment we don't know if this is a good or bad thing and what it means for MS. What we do know is that HSCT may destroy memory cells from your previous vaccinations. This is why you have may have to be revaccinated with all your childhood vaccines at ~2 years after HSCT to restore your immune responses to these common infections.
There is data in the literature that MSers treated with HSCT are at risk of developing secondary autoimmune diseases similar to that which occurs after alemtuzumab treatment. At present we think the risk of secondary autoimmunity after HSCT is lower than that with alemtuzumab, but there is definitely a clear signal. At present I find it difficult to recommend NM-HSCT, over alemtuzumab, unless it is part of a controlled trial, or the MSer had already failed alemtuzumab.
A-HSCT is a different beast compared to NM-HSCT in that the short-term risks associated with the intense chemotherapy needed to ablate the immune system are much worse. Everything is worse; the diarrhoea tends to be bloody and protracted, mucositis is the norm (the lining of your mouth, throat and intestine slough), infections are more severe, and are potentially life-threatening, there is the potential for solid organ toxicity (liver, lungs, kidneys and heart), your bone marrow takes longer to recover and as a result you are more likely to need platelet and blood transfusions. A-HSCT is not for the faint-hearted. A large number of HSCT enthusiasts in the autoimmune field are of the opinion A-HSCT is the way to go; the failure rate from NM-HSCT is too high. They argue that if you are going to take the risk, you might as well go for maximum efficacy.
The seemingly miraculous treatment effects with HSCT, for example of MSers in wheelchairs getting up and walking, is not unique to HSCT. We see these 'Lazarus effects' with other highly-effective DMTs. Provided you have sufficient reserve capacity in the brain and spinal cord you will see spontaneous recovery from relapse-related disability once inflammation is switched off and recovery mechanisms are allowed to proceed. Tragically these Lazarus-like examples create unrealistic expectations for MSers with more advanced disease. Once you have fixed or progressive disability it is likely that you have lost your neurological reserve and hence even if you switch off inflammation with HSCT, or any other anti-inflammatory DMT for that matter, it is unlikely that there will be a significant recovery of function. This is one reason why so many progressive MS trials have failed in the past. Therefore the benefit:risk ratio changes with more advanced disease. This is the reason why most HSCT or BMT units have age and disability cut-offs for MSers.
Yes, I do. The situation where HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care is in the occasional patient with more malignant MS, who has already failed licensed treatment options. In these patients, the benefits of HSCT outway the risks of the disease. In practice, however, I find the main reason why MSers say no to HSCT is the infertility risk. The risk of premature ovarian failure, or early menopause, as a result of the chemotherapy is over 40%. From my experience this figure dissuades many women. Similarly, for males, the cyclophosphamide hits the testes hard and if you want to start, or extend, your family after HSCT you will need to bank sperm.
Please remember the human brain is hard-wired to be optimistic. I like to use the gambler’s dilemma as an analogy. No gambler places a bet, or goes into a casino, to lose money; they always believe they are going to be the one that wins the jackpot. No person will sign-up to HSCT believing that they are going to die or develop complications. However, there will always be the unlucky ones who have the serious complications and occasionally die from the procedure, or develops serious delayed adverse complications. If you decide to have HSCT as part of a trial, or as part of routine care, you need to ask yourself the questions: What if I am the unlucky one? Am I am ready to leave my family and loved ones prematurely? If you answer yes to both, then you are ready to take the risks. In the same way, I always tell my patients who sign-up for alemtuzumab treatment that they should expect to develop a secondary autoimmune complication; if they don’t they should count themselves lucky. if they are not prepared to develop a second autoimmune disease, they shouldn’t be treated with alemtuzumab.
The following are our local eligibility criteria for HSCT and the referral template:
Mode of action of HSCT: HSCT is an immune constitution therapy. It works by by depleting your immune system and allowing it to reconstitute. Hopefully when the immune system has reconstituted the autoimmune cells that cause MS are not present.
Efficacy: Very high
Class: Non-selective IRT, short-term immunosuppression
Immunosuppression: Yes, short-term whilst the immune system is depleted. Once the immune system reconstitutes itself the immune system is competent.
Protocols: The following are some examples for protocol used when HSCT is used to treat MS:
Low intensity (non-myeloablative)
Intermediate intensity (non-myeloablative)
High intensity (myeloablative)
Adverse events and events of special interest:
This is not a complete list of adverse events associated with HSCT. Please note some of the complications can be life-threatening.
Pharmacovigilance monitoring requirements and derisking strategies
Rebaselining: A rebaseline MRI needs to be done after HSCT. Most units do this after bone marrow recovery and patients have had ime to recover from the ordeal of having HSCT. This is typically around 6 months.
Pregnancy: Pregnancy is contraindicated during HSCT as some of the chemotherapies used are teratogenic (damage the developing foetus) may harm the developing foetus. While having HSCT women who might become pregnant should use effective birth control.
Breastfeeding: Some chemotherapy agents are excreted in human milk, therefore, breast-feeding should be discontinued before starting HSCT.
Vaccination: Immunisation is likely to be ineffective when given during or after HSCT. Immunisation with live virus vaccines are generally not recommended, until after the immune system has reconstituted. Some units recommend a routine re-vaccination programme approximately 2 years after HSCT. The need for revaccination depends on the intensity of the chemotherapy regimen used as part of the conditioning regimen; the more intensive the regimen the more likely you are to be revaccinated.