Subsea Cable Burial Sled
Hanh Pham, Paulina Nol, Joe Mills, Zakary Morgan
Sponsored by
Figure 1. Final Design with Seabattery
Project Background
Spawar Systems Center Pacific develops seafloor hardware that support a wide range of Navy missions. One of the hazards for seabed mounted equipment is commercial bottom trawling (Figure 2), Seafloor hardware must be designed to allow trawl nets to ride up and over without snagging. Power and signal cables must be buried to avoid being snagged, crushed or cut by the trawl’s ground gear. The probability of cable failure in a single crossing by trawl gear is a function of cable burial depth as represented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Sea Floor Trawling
Figure 3. Cable Burial Depth vs. Probability of Cable Failure (Pfail)
When Subjected to a Single Trawl Door Crossing
Objective
Design a reliable, low-tech, robust, compact, and inexpensive sled with minimal moving parts, capable of burying several hundred feet of cable sufficiently deep to prevent damage from commercial bottom trawling.
Requirements
Sled capable of traversing an obstacle of at least 30.48 cm (1 ft)
Cable laying system that works passively as the sled is pulled by a winch
Blade should be self digging
System should be able to bury 30.48 m (100 ft) of cable with a minimum bend radius of 7.62 cm (3 in)
Cable needs to be between 15.24 cm (6 in) below surface
Force to pull the sled should not exceed 4450 N (1000 lbf)
The length and width of the sled should be about 152.4 cm (5 ft) and 91.4 cm (3 ft), respectively
Trough cut by the sled should be 1.27 cm (0.5 in) wide
Summary:
. In order to be protected, a 0.64 cm (¼ in) diameter cable needed to be buried 15.24-20.32 cm (6-8 in) in depth. The sled would be deployed from one ocean floor hardware hub and towed to the next subsequent hub by an undersea winch. The hubs can have many functions for the Navy; but overall they are mainly used to help the Navy conduct research and keep their affairs in order in both a domestic and foreign sense. Burying cables can prevent countries in conflict with the United States from damaging communication cables and compromising security information. It would require a maximum of 1780 N (400 lbf) pull force and be capable of navigating obstacles such as anchor chain and rocks. The final design was constructed mostly of steel with a toboggan style sled and a plow style blade. A water jet was also added to help mitigate the pull force needed to get the sled from hub to hub. The reel system was constructed from a simple plastic injection-mold reel and aluminum for the reel supports. A braking system utilizing a belleville washer was also added to help reduce the effects of excessive spinning of the reel causing birds-nesting. The cable feed system was designed simply to make the process of getting the cable into the trough as easy as possible. With this in mind a thin Delrin cylinder, with a radius above the minimum bend radius of the cable, led the cable smoothly into the trough. From the final test, the system as a whole worked as intended and required approximately 1780 N (400 lbf) of pull force to operate the system.
Final Design
Figure 4. Exploded View of Final Design
The final design of the sled features a flat bottomed steel sled, a plow style blade with a guard, a cable reel system with a tension brake, and a Delrin cable feed system. The final design can navigate obstacles of up to 30.48 cm high and requires about 2500 N of pull force provided by the winch. The final design also features a water jet that is provided by a bilge pump with a 1500G/hr rating that will be attached to the front of the blade.
Summary of Performance Results
Risk Reduction Test #1
Purpose: Determine the amount of pull force needed to tow the sled on land.
Risk Reduction Test #2
Purpose: Determine the amount of pull force to tow in water, with new blade and sled design.
Risk Reduction Test #3
Purpose: Test the performance of the cable reel and cable feed system and to determine the inner width of the cable feed system.
Risk Reduction Test #4
Purpose: Test new steel plow blade, reel, and cable feed system in water.
Final Test
Purpose: Test final system design and obstacle negotiation.
Performance of Final Test
Figure 5. Side view of Final Design
Figure 6. Front View of Final Design
The final design was tested at the 25 and 45 degree angles with and without a water jet. From Figures 7 and 8 it is evident having a water jet demonstrated a significant decrease in the overall pull forces. Obstacles such as an angle iron and pipe were also placed in the water to test if the sled could successfully ride over them. The sled was able to overcome the obstacles, and continue burying the cable in the sediment.
Figure 7 and 8. Final Test Average and Maximum Pull Forces for Various Set Ups
Figure 9. Final Test 25 Degree Angle with Water Jet Performance Figure 10. Final Test Best Fit Pull Forces
Video of Final Test Performance