Why might regulation of media products need to occur?
Who regulated media products in the UK?
What are the implications or punishments of violating a regulatory body?
For what reason might a media product be blocked/banned/regulated?
What ASA Code might have been violated?
Why is this important to consider?
What are the implications?
The ad for Volkswagen’s electric eGolf vehicle showed a series of scenes including a man and a woman in a tent on a sheer cliff face, two male astronauts, a male para-athlete and a woman sitting on a bench next to a pram. Text stated: “When we learn to adapt we can achieve anything.”
Complainants said the ad showed men engaged in adventurous activities, that unlike her male counterpart, the female rock climber was “passive” because she was asleep, and that the woman with the pram was depicted in a stereotypical care-giving role.
Volkswagen said its ad was not sexist and that caring for a newborn was a life-changing experience about adaptation, regardless of the gender of the parent depicted.
The ASA, however, “concluded that the ad presented gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm”.
Critics said the new rules were too draconian and that banning even the most innocuous use of gender stereotypes showed the watchdog had gone too far.
Two television ads, one featuring new dads bungling comically while looking after their babies and the other a woman sitting next to a pram, have become the first to be banned under new rules designed to reduce gender stereotyping.
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned the ads for Philadelphia cream cheese and Volkswagen, following complaints from the public that they perpetuated harmful stereotypes.
The new rules, introduced at the beginning of the year, ban the depiction of men and women engaged in gender-stereotypical activities to help stop “limiting how people see themselves and how others see them and the life decisions they take”.
In the ad for Philadelphia, the Mondelez-owned cream cheese brand, two new dads were shown eating lunch at a restaurant where food circulated on a conveyor belt. While chatting they accidentally find their babies are whisked away on it. “Let’s not tell mum,” one of them says.
Complainants said the tongue-in-cheek ad perpetuated a harmful stereotype suggesting men were incapable of caring for children and would put them at risk as a result of their incompetence.
https://www.asa.org.uk/resource/abc-cheatsheet-for-love-island.html
You don't have to graft to get to grips with the key advertising rules in life after the villa. We don't want to get all Factor 50 on you, so we've written an ABC Cheat Sheet to help celebs and influencers stay loyal to their followers.
This is a campaign we're running in conjunction with ITV's Love Island, helping the contestants and other celebs and influencers stick to the ad rules.
The UK advertising watchdog has teamed up with ITV to create a "cheat sheet" that will help this year's Love Island contestants navigate social media ad rules when they leave the villa.
The popularity of the show means that this year's contestants are set to earn as much as £7000 per sponsored Instagram post when the series wraps up. As such, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has published an at-a-glance checklist designed to stop them from falling foul of a regulatory investigation.
At the heart of the "advertising survival kit" is the message that Love Islanders should be transparent with followers when the images or videos they post on platforms like Twitter and Instagram have been paid for by brands.
Both the ASA and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) already recommend that all influencers upfront hashtag disclosures such as #ad to signpost this, rather than #spon or #paid.